Posted on 01/14/2005 7:57:27 AM PST by madprof98
Woo hoo! I've made the big time. Last month, the website Free Republic featured a thread about my Nov. 18 column, "Queers Who Don't Act Right." You probably don't know much about Free Republic unless you are a right-wing lunatic. Free Republic is so far right that wing-nut gay muckraker Matt Drudge and Lucianne Goldberg, one of the architects of the Clinton-Monica Lewinsky brouhaha, both left the site in 1999 because it was too extreme, even for them.
In the years since, the site has become the contemporary version of a marathon meeting of the old John Birch Society and the KKK. Most recently, Free Republic was in the news when John Corsi, one of the Swift Boat Veterans who authored a book attacking John Kerry, turned out to post embarrassingly racist messages there. (Of course, he argued his racist insults were all "a joke." Talk about your Clintonian rhetoric.) The site also was in the news recently because someone correctly posted that Dan Rather had relied on phony documents to impute President Bush's National Guard service.
Free Republic is so extreme that it's a blast to read. Don't bother to explore the site with the idea of posting an alternative perspective or to correct facts. Your post will simply be deleted, despite its owner's celebration of freedom of speech. The site has no hesitation in reprinting copyrighted material, like my column, even though the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times both successfully sued to stop such theft. In other words, as is generally true of the lunatic far right, the truth, free speech and the law only matter when they support their point of view.
Of course, Freepers, as the creepy wing-nuts on the site are called, were not alone in being outraged by my column. I received quite a lot of mail, mainly from other gay people, questioning my argument that LA Fitness at Ansley Mall overreacted when it closed its sauna because of some occasional sex and reopened it with a new picture window overlooking the locker room. As an update, I might add that the window has effectively eliminated unseen sexual interactions inside the sauna and made room for another, more open form of sex between people on either side of the window: exhibitionism and voyeurism.
Most of my correspondents argued that the occasional discovery of sex in the sauna merited involvement by the police and the health department, reconstruction of the sauna and a report by one of the local TV stations. And, as usual, they concluded that because I called that overreacting, I must favor sex in public spaces. No matter that I said I find the behavior annoying. To be righteous, I must find it -- what? -- criminally actionable.
I wasn't surprised by the reaction. Sex troubles people more than anything. That's why Clinton was impeached for lying about a blowjob, while Bush was re-elected despite lying about a war that has killed thousands. Gay people's oppression is the result of their sex lives, so it's not surprising that they are hypersensitive to anything that might add to the picture of deviance. But it has become obvious that the very effort to make all deviance disappear and to assimilate -- to marry, for example -- increases prejudice.
The Freepers, of course, took outrage over my column to dizzy heights, fabricating arguments I did not make. This began with the man who posted it, "madpro98." He said that I dismissed "all sexual conventions, including common decency, as so much homophobia." Actually, I wrote no such thing. Then, of course, the Freepers concluded that the case of LA Fitness means every gay man is a sauna whore. For example, "Sender" writes: "Does anyone else think it's strange that gay men often have sex in a public toilet stall? ... Even if we had unisex public restrooms, somehow I can't imagine a man and a woman eyeing one another while washing their hands, then just jumping in the stall for a go."
The writer obviously has never been to Buckhead on a Saturday night. But what cracks me up is that the Freepers are so anxious to bash someone like me that they don't even realize when they are supporting a contrary argument. For example, "buffyt" quoted my statement that I don't like "stumbling upon any sex scene to which I have not been invited." Then she riffed obsessively about heterosexual couples at Mardi Gras "coupling all over the place" while the police ignore them. Exactly. Heterosexuals spoil the view with public sexual interactions every bit as much as homosexuals, arguably more, when they can find a place to do it. Nobody followed up on that post, of course.
I'm not going to quote the mind-boggling illogics and endless sophomoric fag-bashing (despite arguing they aren't homophobic). But I will thank "Jack Black," who wrote: "I think this was very well written. He is writing for the audience of radical homosexuals as one, so I have trouble twisting my thoughts enough to get to his point of view, but I still think the writing is good." Kiss me, dude!
Cliff Bostock holds a Ph.D. in depth psychology. Write him at cliff.bostock@ creativeloafing.com.
As said in Romans 1:22 ---- Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.
Hey - read my tagline!
Welcome.
AQG made the eyeball and called us in.
Wish teh troll had stuck around, there's plenty more taunting to go around.
*chuckle*
Looks like good old fashioned California quackery.
He got erased.
"Hey, can I check your depth? I have a PhD!"
I believe that this is the Jack Black that he was referring to (the FReeper):
http://freerepublic.com/~jackblack/index?U=http%3A%2F%2Ffreerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Ff-news%2F1320791%2Freplies%3Fc%3D303
ping for later
I spent a few minutes researching the Pacifica Graduate Institute, seeing as I had never heard of it.Yes, and when they refused, you could get all liberal-hysterical and accuse them of being fascists.
Bye, ExPatBack!He's dead, Jim!
LOL!
Yup, only following the set script they use.
*chuckle*
"But, but.. I LOVE my computer! She brings me warmth, happiness, and comfort!"
There is no reason to actually visit the Drudge site once you know about FreeRepublic. Hundreds of other linked articles and every article that you will find on Drudge will be found here with the added benefits of commentary and without the annoying pop ups that Drudge has.
Drudge dropped his FreeRepublic link because it is a very dumb business move to advertise a product that is much better than (and which can replace) your own product.
This writer's screed is basically nothing more than anyone here babbling on and on that his writing is nothing more than reading ( insert the name of the most extremist and vile far-Left wing hate group here ).
His commentary is so over-the-top and hysterical that he essentially mocks himself.
tortured conservative waiting to come out of the closet
I think that guy is a few myths short of a Bulfinch's.
You could really scramble their minds by saying "HE brings me warmth and happiness". They'd be so conflicted their heads would twist off.
LOL!
I think their skulls would explode from the stresses involved.
The conflict within would erupt molten mind goo out the tops of their heads.
That's a good point. In terms of news, FR is the ultimate in one-stop shopping.
Drudge is kind of a specialty shop that specializes in ultrafresh news. But if it's a significant item, it'll be on FR within a few minutes -- with the benefit of freeper commentary.
This writer's screed is basically nothing more than anyone here babbling on and on that his writing is nothing more than reading ( insert the name of the most extremist and vile far-Left wing hate group here ).
Exactly. If you've seen one of these screeds, you've about seen them all. The only time they're interesting is when they have an element of truth to them and make me uncomfortable. When there's no truth, my eyes glaze over. They just bounce off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
