Posted on 01/12/2005 8:35:48 AM PST by Miami Vice
Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, mythologies that the Founders were irreligious or wanted to ban religion are considered fact.
According to the Washington Times, “The California lawyer who tried to have the phrase 'under God' removed from the Pledge of Allegiance now wants to legally prevent President Bush from placing his hand on a Bible while being sworn in at his inauguration.”
This is just the latest part of the theophobic campaign to eliminate religion from American society.
Theophobes like to claim that the Founding Fathers were deists who never wanted a religious society. They maintain that there are numerous quotes and examples of their contempt for religion.
One thing referenced is the Treaty of Tripoli of 1797. This is proffered as absolute proof that the Founding Fathers did not want the United States to be a religious nation.
Alan Colmes referenced this treaty during Hannity and Colmes one evening and so has the ACLU. This treaty ranks next to Jefferson’s "wall of separation between church and state" phrase as the core of their argument to prohibit the expression of religion in public.
This is sheer sophistry.
If all the evidence the theophobes have that the Founders wanted to bowdlerize religion from America is a meaningless symbolic phrase, fraudulently inserted into an obscure unconscionable treaty that was revoked three years later, and, ratified so that the lives of American hostages could be saved, then they have no evidence at all.
There are several problems with using this treaty as an example that the Founders disdained religion.
Theophobes like to state that John Adams signed this treaty and it was ratified by the Senate even though it included this clause: “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion…”
However, they omit several things about this treaty:
· The treaty was revoked a few years later anyway
· The clause was not included in the original version of the treaty. It was mysteriously, perhaps fraudulently, inserted by Joel Barlow, the Algerian Consul who was a condemner of Christianity.
· The original Arabic version is on file at the State Department, although it is Barlow’s English version that was ratified by the Senate and signed by Adams.
· The treaty states several times the phrase, “Praise be to God.”
· The treaty was made primarily to save the lives of American hostages. One can conclude that if the treaty said the moon were made of green cheese it would have been ratified by the Senate and signed by Adams.
· A Spanish translation of this treaty references treaties with Christian nations -- meaning in this case the US.
When one considers these facts about the treaty, the assertion that it is evidence of the Founders' intent to prohibit religious expression or that there is no relevance to religion or for that matter Judeo-Christian history is not true.
Theophobes like to ignore legal documents claiming that America is a religious nation. There are several -- including at least one Supreme Court case.
One such document is the opinion in the 1811 case of People v. Ruggles. This is a ruling by the New York Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice of the New York Supreme Court was James Kent, author of Commentaries on American Law. He wrote in his opinion, “We are a Christian people…. Christianity, in its enlarged sense, as a religion revealed and taught in the Bible, is not unknown to our law.”
Another court case is the 1892 United States Supreme Court opinion in Holy Trinity Church v. US. This case involved the hiring of an English pastor, which was prevented by immigration officials, because of a prohibition on foreign laborers. The U.S. Supreme Court determined that the prohibition did not apply to pastors because “this is a Christian nation.” The justices cite People v. Ruggles.
Theophobes have a catalog of quotes to indicate that the Founders were either deists or atheists or hated Christianity. This is to prove that the Founders wanted a completely secular nation.
As is usually the case, the theophobes only marshal those quotes that advocate their cause and do not provide others by the same people that would make their cause illegitimate.
For example, it is often said that George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were deists. This is not true.
There is a church in Philadelphia, Saint Peter’s Episcopal, which indicates the pew used by Washington when he attended services there.
(Ironically, Stephen Decatur, the hero of the Battle of Tripoli is buried in this same churchyard.)
Benjamin Franklin is buried in the Old Christ’s Church burial ground. This would be an odd place if he were the irreligious person theophobes claim.
Theophobes like to refer to various quotes from Thomas Jefferson to deny his religiosity, including the separation of church and state quote. However, they ignore his 1816 letter to Charles Thomson in which he said, “I am a real Christian."
Theophobes like this quote of Adams, “I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!" Yet, they ignore Adams’ 1797 Inaugural speech (same year as the treaty) during which he said, “ consider….Christianity among the best recommendations for the public service…”
There are too many religious practices and symbols associated with the United States to claim that the Founders were not religious or wanted to exclude religion from America. Indeed, at least one signer of the Constitution was an ordained minister.
It is unfortunate that despite the evidence, mythologies that the Founders were irreligious or wanted to ban religion are considered fact. This is a function of the erroneous revisionist history taught by schools and colleges.
A benefit of living and working for two decades near Independence Hall is that history is right here and does not depend on the prejudicial prism of a tendentious scholar.
A former police officer, Michael Tremoglie's work has appeared in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, Human Events, FrontPage Magazine, and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
Ping!
Help Protect the Inaugural Prayer!
Add your name to the group of 8,637 people who have already signed using the Internet!
http://www.aclj.net/entrance/enter.cfm?dn=1008&source=2036&CFID=536776&CFTOKEN=94059245
Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) - http://www.alliancedefensefund.org
Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) - http://www.thomasmore.org
American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) - http://www.aclj.org
The Rutherford Institute - http://www.rutherford.org/
Stop the ACLU Coalition - http://www.stoptheaclu.org
Here are a few examples of how two of those organizations are fighting back:
ADF Contacts Over 3,600 School Districts Over Attempts To Censor Christmas
ADF: 700 lawyers ready to fight ACLU lawsuits
ADF: Pentagons' Warning About Boyscouts Is Absurd
Thomas More Law Center: Town of Palm Beach Pays $50,000 In Attorney Fees Apologizes To Women In Nativity Lawsuit
Additional information:
The ACLU must be destroyed: Joseph Farah supports Boy Scouts, urges Americans to fight back
Citizens mobilized to stop ACLU (seeks to consign group to 'ash heap of history')
ACLU fulfilling communist agenda
Revealing FACTS on the ACLU from its own writings
See how YOUR Senator or Representative ranks with the ACLU
This yahoo group just started on December 3, 2004 and is looking for new members
Let me know if you would like to join my ACLU ping list
"all the evidence the theophobes have that the Founders wanted to bowdlerize religion from America is a meaningless symbolic phrase, fraudulently inserted into an obscure unconscionable treaty that was revoked three years later"
That's funny, such doesn't matter to Dems. After all, the much-vaunted Jeffersonian "wall of separation" was in a mere LETTER which had NO FORCE OF LAW whatsoever! So why not love an actual treaty even if it was revoked?
"It is unfortunate that despite the evidence, mythologies that the Founders were irreligious or wanted to ban religion are considered fact. This is a function of the erroneous revisionist history taught by schools and colleges."
More evidence (no pun) of the theory that if you repeat something enough times, people believe it. Regardless of evidence!
Good find and a BTTT.
These are the same whack-jobs, the heirs to Yankee cranks of New England ( Beecher, Garrison, Stanton, Brownlee, Cady, Anthony, & etc.)the spiriual forefathers ( can they be foremothers?) of the PC crowd today. I hate to agree with Newt Gingich but he is dead on about the re-invention of American history.
History must pass the Roger Baldwin lithmus test of correctness. Equality means lack of excellence. Opportunity means entitlement. Effort means showing up -if that.
Since the 19th Century, the philosophical thrust has been to remove any semblance of religious devotion from the public imagination. Orestes Brownson in 1865 wrote about the threat posed to this country by humanitarian socialists who were attempting to create a godless egalitarian state.
Boy they are getting there.
Interesting thing about the treaty, too, is that Jefferson later went to war against the Barbary Pirates (thus the line in the Marines song "...to the shores of Tripli...").
So yeah, no enmity existed, until they started (or continued) the pattern of terrorism that dominates their agenda today...
Nice article, except that the neologism "theophobia" seems a little off base. The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom, and these folk are obviously the fools who say in their heart there is no God.
bump
What nonsense. This "argument" rests upon a dishonest (if the author is aware of it) or imbecilic (if not) blurring of the distinction between denying special rights to religion (which is most certainly the position of the Founders) and prohibition of religion (which is a ridiculous straw man).
Deists my *ss!
You would think it would be pretty obvious.
bull
Is it a special right for a teacher to wear a crucifix into a classroom?
Is it a specail right for hs football players VOLUNTARILY praying after a TD?
Do things mean special rights to you? These are things that are being prohibited. If you think these are special rights you are warped and a theophobe fanatic yourself.
I read a source that said that Washington attended services at the insistence of his wife (hardly an uncommon scenario these days, God knows), but did not take Communion. If you don't take Communion, the C of E then and the Episcopal Church now doesn't consider you a member in good standing. Now, whether that's true or not I don't know, but his mere attendance is not a guarantee that he considered himself a Christian.
Benjamin Franklin is buried in the Old Christ’s Church burial ground. This would be an odd place if he were the irreligious person theophobes claim.
People do get buried in odd places. It's not like Benjamin Franklin had the final say in where he got buried.
Theophobes like to refer to various quotes from Thomas Jefferson to deny his religiosity, including the separation of church and state quote. However, they ignore his 1816 letter to Charles Thomson in which he said, “I am a real Christian."
I believe that you'll find that Thomas Jefferson wrote his own version of the New Testament where all the miracles, etc., were taken out, but all the moral precepts were left in; apparently he didn't credit Christ's divine nature. The comment that you quote would be consistent with people these days who say, "I'm a real Christian because I believe [ whatever ], whereas you've got it wrong and you're not a real Christian."
Just to note that things aren't always as they seem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.