1 posted on
01/12/2005 3:23:54 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
The 2004 Democratic National Platform for America states that the party stands "proudly for a woman's right to choose, consistent with Roe v. Wade," and adds that "abortion should be safe, legal, and rare."
There is nothing rare about abortion. Abortionists have killed more unborn babies than Stalin and Hitler killed live human beings put together.
To: kattracks
The Democrats choosing a pro-life chairman is as likely as Jerry Falwell being chosen as editor of Hustler magazine.
3 posted on
01/12/2005 3:47:10 AM PST by
MisterRepublican
("I must go. I must be elusive.")
To: kattracks
The fact that it is even being considered is a wonderful sign for pro-life people. They realize they have to try and fool ya'll from Jesusland. This is good news...
Thankfully, Jesuslanders are not the dopes that the elite think they are.
7 posted on
01/12/2005 3:59:54 AM PST by
JudyinCanada
(Five-fingered Canadian)
To: kattracks
"Feldt accused Roemer of "rejecting his party's platform and core belief that women should have access to the reproductive health care they need."
I'm tired of hearing this phrase.
Now, I'm not going to interject my position on the matter of abortion, but just what the h*ll does abortion have to do with access to reproductive health care?
For that matter, what does abortion have to do with reproduction?
Seems to me like a made up phrase, as in "jobless recovery."
8 posted on
01/12/2005 4:07:02 AM PST by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: kattracks
Abortion "rights"is the 1
st commandment to the humanist,socialist dems.
Why?
Because it allows for intimate relations at whim and will without consequence and responsibility.The result is twofold.A slap in the face of religious teaching which they always delight in and second it works to undermine and destroy the traditional family .This in turn helps to create a socialist society without strong family structure thus creating more dependence on the parent government.
In essence if sex is free and "safe" outside marriage than another reason for marriage is lost.
What the 60s radical libs pushed,free sex,drug use wasn`t just a lets have a good time movement but a political tactic to advance socialism.
Abortion is a cornerstone of that and will never be abandoned by the left.
12 posted on
01/12/2005 4:32:53 AM PST by
carlr
To: kattracks
RATS attempting to soften their pro-abortion stance is mere window dressing. In Blue states - such as as NJ, IL, and WA - the RATS are pushing for huge funding of stem cell research. Not exactly a way to trick pro-lifers into voting for them.
13 posted on
01/12/2005 4:33:00 AM PST by
Kuksool
(Voter Fraud has been perfected in Seattle)
To: kattracks
Hyenas fighting over an already rotting carcass..they don't realize that once it's consumed, they'll all starve...
16 posted on
01/12/2005 4:54:25 AM PST by
ken5050
To: kattracks
Only if they want to throw their base overboard.
To: kattracks
Nice window-dressing but meaningless.
What good does it do if the DNC chairman is pro-life but 90% of the rest of his party are pro-abortion? All this might do is hand their media butt-lickers a bogus talking point whenever the subject of 'values' come up. It also might make the 7 moderates in the Democrat party feel all warm and fuzzy at their party's "inclusiveness" but in the end it's all a sham as is the whole Rat party-it has no foundation. Kick in the front door and the whole rotten structure will come tumbling down.
22 posted on
01/12/2005 5:21:33 AM PST by
Larry381
(Unemployed conservative, because NY hates business, so they move to North Carolina)
To: kattracks
Democrats support abortion because it kills babies.
27 posted on
01/12/2005 6:15:53 AM PST by
MrBambaLaMamba
(Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the enemy at least you can piss on their god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson