The Democrats choosing a pro-life chairman is as likely as Jerry Falwell being chosen as editor of Hustler magazine.
You know, the reason people elect Congressmen and Senators is so that they go to Washington and MAKE A DIFFERENCE, change the law, and make new laws.
No one wants a token Pro-life Democrat.
ROFLOL!
I don't know --- they've figuered out that it was the Christian vote that won the last election.
Pro-Life Democrat Faces Opposition From Massachusetts Party Leader
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
January 11, 2005
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Days after pro-life former Indiana congressman Tim Roemer declared his candidacy for the chairmanship of the national Democratic Party, the head of the party's Massachusetts affiliate says it would be "extremely foolish" for the pro-abortion party to select Roemer to lead it.
Phil Johnston, hailing from the home state of former presidential candidate John Kerry, said it would be unwise for the party to back Roemer, even though Kerry lost the presidential election.
"The fact that we lost the 2004 presidential race by a narrow margin should not result in the abandonment of our party's core principles," Johnston told the Associated Press.
Though polls say Kerry's pro-abortion stance contributed to his defeat, Johnston said that Democrats would only regain the White House by doing a better job of articulating its core principles like its support for unlimited abortion.
"It would be extremely foolish if the DNC were to be led by a chair who agrees with the Bush administration's position on abortion," Johnston added.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat1103.html
If people really cared about the issue of abortion more than a having a political issue, then you would think that the Democrats should be encouraged not mocked.