Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rathergate Scandal Worse Than Previously Known
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | 1/12/05 | Accuracy In Media

Posted on 01/12/2005 1:00:01 AM PST by kattracks

Accuracy in Media said today that the newly released report on how CBS News handled the Bush National Guard story contains a bombshell that further undermines the credibility of CBS News anchorman Dan Rather and his close collaborator and associate, producer Mary Mapes.

The report reveals on page 130 that Mapes, one of those fired because of the scandal, had documented information in her possession before the controversial September 8 broadcast that George W. Bush, while in the Texas Air National Guard, "did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots." This information is critical because Dan Rather, in the broadcast, insinuated that Bush was among the "many well-connected young men [who tried to] pull strings and avoid service in Vietnam."

AIM Editor Cliff Kincaid explained the significance of the panel's revelation: "Mapes, who was very close to Rather and enjoyed his confidence, had the evidence exonerating Bush of this malicious charge. The report shows that there were multiple credible sources to prove that Bush did not try to avoid Vietnam by going into the National Guard and that he was in fact willing to go to Vietnam as a pilot. However, CBS News deliberately kept this information from its viewers and conveyed an opposite impression because Rather, Mapes & Company were trying to depict Bush as a coward who, as Commander-in-Chief, was sending American soldiers to their deaths in Iraq."

The report reveals that Rather assured CBS News President Andrew Heyward that he, Rather, had not "been involved in this much checking on a story since Watergate," and that it was "very big." The report says that Rather assured Heyward that the story was "thoroughly vetted" or documented and verified.

Kincaid explained, "Rather saw this as a Watergate-style story that could damage the Bush campaign and sink the President's chances for re-election, as Americans were fighting and dying in Iraq. He seemed to be making a virtual guarantee that the story would be a smoking gun that would usher John Kerry into the White House. Instead, the story backfired, implicating Rather and his associates in a sleazy political operation, with links to the Kerry campaign, that was intended to mislead and misinform the American people as they prepared to vote on issues of war and peace. Even Al Jazeera couldn't have concocted a more sinister and dishonest attack on the President of the United States."

The "Rathergate" affair involved Dan Rather narrating a pre-election September 8 CBS "60 Minutes" story, based on forged documents, charging that President Bush not only used connections to join the Texas Air National Guard to avoid service in the Vietnam War, but didn't fulfill the terms of his Guard service.

When questions surfaced about the authenticity of the documents, CBS stonewalled, covered-up, and eventually apologized. An "Independent Review Panel" was formed to investigate. Former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and former Associated Press president Louis Boccardi were in charge of the probe.

Now, three months later, the findings have been issued and four mid-level employees have been fired. They are Senior Vice President Betsy West, "60 Minutes Wednesday" Executive Producer Josh Howard, Senior Broadcast Producer Mary Murphy, and producer Mapes.

However, other major players in the fiasco were not fired. They are Heyward, Rather, and CBS News White House correspondent John Roberts. Rather is retiring in March and Roberts is said to be in the running as Rather's successor.

Kincaid noted that CBS chairman Les Moonves, who issued a statement on the matter, insists that Heyward should stay in his job "during this challenging time." Kincaid said, "It's like rewarding the skipper of the Titanic for promising not to hit an iceberg again. Heyward was the captain of the CBS news ship and he and Rather have survived only because Moonves has thrown the women and children overboard."

Kincaid was amused by several references in the report to how hard Dan Rather was working at the time, as if this gets him off the hook for narrating the discredited report. "I understand it is par for the course in network news magazine shows for a network star to put his face on the work of others," Kincaid said. "But the report also quotes Heyward as saying that Rather had assured him that the story was solid, documented and verified. So why are Rather and Heyward still in their jobs?"

While the report claims no hard evidence of anti-Bush political bias on the part of CBS News, Kincaid said the report is full of evidence of such bias. "Why is it that CBS News and so many other news organizations cited in the report were so anxious to do a story attacking President Bush's National Guard service?" asked Kincaid. "Why is it that the same news organizations were not eager to attack Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's failure to release all of his military and medical records? The answer is simple: they wanted Kerry to win and Bush to lose. This is partisan political bias, pure and simple."

The report notes that other news organizations on the Bush story were the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, Associated Press, and USA Today (which published a story using the same dubious documents that the dubious CBS source, Bill Burkett, had given to CBS. USA Today has not apologized for running this story.)

The survival of CBS News White House correspondent John Roberts, rumored as a possible successor to Rather, is also curious. The report says that Roberts had interviewed Burkett for a February 12, 2004 CBS Evening News broadcast¯months before the anti-Bush hit piece aired¯and aired a portion of that interview, even though Roberts had found Burkett "unreliable."

As we have explained in a previous release, Roberts was the personal representative of CBS News, sitting in for Dan Rather, in a meeting with White House communications director Dan Bartlett, at a critical time when CBS News was developing its fake "story." In the meeting with Roberts, Bartlett was told that he was supposed to confirm or deny authenticity of the National Guard documents that turned out to be bogus. When Bartlett did not immediately denounce them as forgeries, Roberts provided that information to "60 Minutes" producer Mary Mapes, as if Bartlett's refusal to disavow the documents meant that they were authentic. This was seen as the critical green light for Mapes (and Rather) to go ahead with the bogus story.

Bartlett later explained that CBS News provided documents that CBS News had said had "come from the personal file of a former commander" in the National Guard and that Roberts expected Bartlett "to authenticate them." The White House received the documents only three and one-half hours before Bartlett was interviewed by Roberts about them. Bartlett commented that "CBS had the obligation to authenticate them before they were used. They could have also given them to the White House much earlier so we had more time to verify them as well."

Kincaid commented, "John Roberts was in a position to stop this fraudulent story before it aired. He did not."

The new panel report sheds some light on this controversy, noting that Roberts said the Bartlett interview had "gone well and that he had not disputed the authenticity of the documents…" The panel said "this reaction" by Roberts and CBS "seriously misplaced responsibility for making sure that the documents were authentic."

So John Roberts, the likely successor to Dan Rather, was guilty of helping to perpetuate this journalistic fraud. The facts are clear.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aim; ammo; cbsinbedwithdemorats; cbsnews; cbsstinks; dangertodemecracy; lurchgate; mediabias; putridrather; rathergate; robertsisafraud; scandals; seebsnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Blurblogger; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; devolve; Grampa Dave; potlatch; yall


From the article:

AIM Editor Cliff Kincaid explained the significance of the panel's revelation: "Mapes, who was very close to Rather and enjoyed his confidence, had the evidence exonerating Bush of this malicious charge. The report shows that there were multiple credible sources to prove that Bush did not try to avoid Vietnam by going into the National Guard and that he was in fact willing to go to Vietnam as a pilot. However, CBS News deliberately kept this information from its viewers and conveyed an opposite impression because Rather, Mapes & Company were trying to depict Bush as a coward who, as Commander-in-Chief, was sending American soldiers to their deaths in Iraq."

The report reveals that Rather assured CBS News President Andrew Heyward that he, Rather, had not "been involved in this much checking on a story since Watergate," and that it was "very big." The report says that Rather assured Heyward that the story was "thoroughly vetted" or documented and verified.

Kincaid explained, "Rather saw this as a Watergate-style story that could damage the Bush campaign and sink the President's chances for re-election, as Americans were fighting and dying in Iraq. He seemed to be making a virtual guarantee that the story would be a smoking gun that would usher John Kerry into the White House. Instead, the story backfired, implicating Rather and his associates in a sleazy political operation, with links to the Kerry campaign, that was intended to mislead and misinform the American people as they prepared to vote on issues of war and peace. Even Al Jazeera couldn't have concocted a more sinister and dishonest attack on the President of the United States."





61 posted on 01/12/2005 7:40:17 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
OK. SO much for CBS news. Now please tell me this, since this is an obvious case of SLANDER who is being charged? Dan Rather? CBS? Whom?

You're right. It is slander! I didn't think of that aspect.

62 posted on 01/12/2005 7:45:01 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tom D.

Chomp, chomp, chomp. That is the sound of the "fine folks" at cBS eating their own. The sad thing is, the ones really responsible for this fraud won't be made to pay any price what so ever. I only hope that Mapes and the other two women fire will turn this into a sexual discrimination thing and they go after Dan Blather and anyone else thay feel they need to. Hopefully, this will lead to the end of cBS as a "news" network.


63 posted on 01/12/2005 8:38:14 AM PST by NCC-1701 (ISLAM IS A CULT, PURE AND SIMPLE!!!!! IT MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; devolve; potlatch; Boazo; Grampa Dave; Conspiracy Guy; ...
CBS INTENTIONALLY WITHELD G.W. BUSH'S GOOD MILITARY SERVICE RECORD

The report reveals on page 130 that Mapes, one of those fired because of the scandal, had documented information in her possession before the controversial September 8 broadcast that George W. Bush, while in the Texas Air National Guard, "did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots."

This information is critical because Dan Rather, in the broadcast, insinuated that Bush was among the "many well-connected young men [who tried to] pull strings and avoid service in Vietnam."


64 posted on 01/12/2005 8:51:27 AM PST by Happy2BMe ("Islam fears democracy worse than anything- If the imams can't control it - they will kill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I want to know why CBS is not trying to find out where the forged documents came from to begin with!!!

Amen. I would bet you a Diet Coke that if we had access to the DNC hard drives, we would find campaign ads in the Windows Media and Real Player programs they were planning to run.

They would have shown John Kerry "reporting for duty" while GW Bush "failed to report for duty." They had them all set and ready to run weeks before CBS aired this story. There is no other explanation for Kerry's ridiculous and comic "salute" (he actually looks like he is hunting for Indians in his backyard) stunt.


65 posted on 01/12/2005 9:12:20 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

66 posted on 01/12/2005 11:48:31 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
George Bush...."While in the Texas Air National Guard, "did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots."

I have known about this for years. Isn't it CURIOUS that it has never been reported [as far as I know] by any MSM outlet or reporter.

Just this ONE sentence makes all other negative ramblings about his service in the ANG so much crap.

67 posted on 01/12/2005 12:14:17 PM PST by PISANO (The MSM's MOTTO: "Whatever it is..if it's bad.....it's GW's fault!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
George W. Bush, while in the Texas Air National Guard, "did volunteer for service in Vietnam but was turned down in favor of more experienced pilots." This information is critical because Dan Rather, in the broadcast, insinuated that Bush was among the "many well-connected young men [who tried to] pull strings and avoid service in Vietnam."

Of course there was no political motivation on the part of the CBS crew..... I mean it's sooooo obvious...

68 posted on 01/12/2005 12:19:46 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

True, true, the MSM are anxious to sweep this embarrassing situation under the rug.

I guess to them sometimes the public "doesn't have the right to know"....


69 posted on 01/12/2005 12:21:29 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

Smoking gun.


70 posted on 01/12/2005 12:26:42 PM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Ghey!


71 posted on 01/12/2005 12:31:15 PM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Credibility? How about their culpability in a CRIME? Calling Mr. Gonzales . . . Mr. Alberto Gonzales to the courtesy phone in the lobby. If I was the President, I'd have Justice so far up CBS's arse on this that they would NEVER forget it.


72 posted on 01/12/2005 12:38:47 PM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

Exactly . . . sorry, didn't read your post before I made mine. Like you, I believe a CRIME has been committed.


73 posted on 01/12/2005 12:39:41 PM PST by jayef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

If a civil proceedure is provoked, then subpoena power, disclosure, depositions, written interrogatories. If the crowd at CBS are sued, then they will all get their own lawyers, and each of their personal interest are different, and you divide and conquer. Get them pointing the finger at each other and the truth may be disclosed. Short of that, I don't think the heat has been turned up enough. If criminal justice would impannel a grand jury, then we would find out who the turd in the punch bowl is. I pray it would be so.


74 posted on 01/12/2005 12:53:39 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

He needs to do hard time. He tried to overthrow a duely elected government.


75 posted on 01/12/2005 12:54:47 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

That was the planned message.


76 posted on 01/12/2005 1:13:33 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

What's with his stance in this pic? hanoi john looks like Little Boy Lollipop.


77 posted on 01/12/2005 1:28:54 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

make no mistake about it, this is the democrat party.

i wrote moonves the day this story broke before the election, demanding that rather resign.


78 posted on 01/12/2005 2:07:30 PM PST by ken21 (buenos mucus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
MSM political bias bump.
79 posted on 01/12/2005 2:34:33 PM PST by carl in alaska (Once a Chargers fan, always a Chargers fan....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oso blanco
***Don't forget, Burkett claims he was provided the documents by someone else.***>

That's correct. So even he would be 'off the hook' unless it could be proved he was lying and made them himself (fat chance of that)

(I was going to add that but was in a rush to post so I could get some work done.)

80 posted on 01/12/2005 2:37:56 PM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson