Wow! Two posts on this old Foster thread today. The lack of suspicion, or even interst, from the newer Freepers was what prompted me to start this thread. If there's not much interest on FR, ot's hard to see how it will come to be that this is "argued over for hundreds of years to come." I wish you would be right here, but sadly I doubt it.
As for Alamo Girl, I don't mean to demean her work but there is little doubt that Hugh Sprunt and Alan Favish's work has a better chance of being cited (or ridiculed) in the future. (Sprunt wrote the "CIR" - cited in post #1 on this thread, and Freeper Favish got his Foster Freedom of Information case all the way to the "Supreme Court." (Quotes there because they're that in name only IMHO.)
ML/NJ
Sorry for the double hit.
ML/NJ
You're right about the citations and scholarly stuff, but Alamo girl's work gives the flavor of the era and is real as opposed to one man's rendering of the facts.
I mentioned it because you were interested in those who visit here and don't know about the Vince Foster subject.
Alamo Girl's work is linked from FR and is easy to come by and free. For someone who knows little or nothing, it is a good palace to begin.