The outstanding contribution to future US historians by the FReeper Alamo Girl must be cited when mentioning Clinton and especially with regard to Vince Foster. Recent FReepers who don't know of her work are in bad shape because it is probably the mos extensive gathering of info on the subject and once begun might be hard to quit.
Wow! Two posts on this old Foster thread today. The lack of suspicion, or even interst, from the newer Freepers was what prompted me to start this thread. If there's not much interest on FR, ot's hard to see how it will come to be that this is "argued over for hundreds of years to come." I wish you would be right here, but sadly I doubt it.
As for Alamo Girl, I don't mean to demean her work but there is little doubt that Hugh Sprunt and Alan Favish's work has a better chance of being cited (or ridiculed) in the future. (Sprunt wrote the "CIR" - cited in post #1 on this thread, and Freeper Favish got his Foster Freedom of Information case all the way to the "Supreme Court." (Quotes there because they're that in name only IMHO.)
ML/NJ
Wow! Two posts on this old Foster thread today. The lack of suspicion, or even interst, from the newer Freepers was what prompted me to start this thread. If there's not much interest on FR, ot's hard to see how it will come to be that this is "argued over for hundreds of years to come." I wish you would be right here, but sadly I doubt it.
As for Alamo Girl, I don't mean to demean her work but there is little doubt that Hugh Sprunt and Alan Favish's work has a better chance of being cited (or ridiculed) in the future. (Sprunt wrote the "CIR" - cited in post #1 on this thread, and Freeper Favish got his Foster Freedom of Information case all the way to the "Supreme Court." (Quotes there because they're that in name only IMHO.)
ML/NJ