Posted on 01/08/2005 11:54:30 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
Sen. Spector (in opening statements): "The department will have a major role in implementing President Bush's proposals to revise our nation's immigration laws and to deal with the 10 million aliens who are in this country illegally."
"The attorney general has exercised the authority to overrule conclusions by the immigration judge and a board of immigration appeals. And this is an issue that lingers after considerable questioning of Attorney General Ashcroft as to what standards ought to be used. And the attorney general, John Ashcroft, conceded before this committee that it's not sufficient to simply cite national security. And that will be a question which we will want to inquire into."
(Way later after Sen. Leahy dredged up the torture allegations every chance possible.)
Sen. Kennedy: "One is the -- which we talked about -- the state and local law enforcement of immigration laws. Youre familiar with this. In 2002 the Department of Justice reversed long-standing policies -- supported the inherent authority of states to enforce federal immigration laws, and this -- that reversal was based on an Office of Legal Counsel opinion thats not been made public. And Ive asked for a copy of the opinions; so have others of the Congress; interested parties have asked for it too. The refusal to -- its been the subject of a lawsuit. The departments response failed to provide the opinion but simply offered its conclusion without any discussion.
I have difficulty finding a good reason why the department continues to keep the opinion and its legal analysis secret, especially since it reverses a long-standing policy that scores of police chiefs, police departments around the country, including many in your home state of Texas, have denounced the idea of involving state and local police in federal immigration enforcement. Last month the International Association of Chiefs of Police issued a report expressing concern. They and others believe it will destroy the remarkable progress theyve made with community policing in which police have worked closely with the public, including immigrant communities, and developed productive bonds of trust -- concerns raised by law enforcement shared by many conservative and security experts. I cant believe Im quoting Grover Norquist -- Bob Barr, the Heritage Foundation all say this could be an unmanageable burden on the law enforcement officials."
So could you tell us why -- quickly as you could -- the secrecy, and can you tell us whether youd support them releasing the OLC opinion on the authority to --"
MR. GONZALES: "Senator, thank you for that question. You and I did talk about that in your office. This matter is in litigation, as you indicated; there is FOIA litigation about the release of the memo. The conclusions are known. Its the analysis, the deliberations that went into the opinion that I think the department is seeking to protect.
Let me just emphasize, though, or try to provide reassurance about this.
There is no requirement, of course, upon state and locals to enforce federal immigration laws. This is purely voluntary. In fact, of course, some states have prohibitions; they couldnt do it even if they wanted to. In some cases the department, as I understand it, has entered into with state or local departments, in terms of memorandums of understanding in order to enforce this. Were certainly -- I certainly am sensitive to the notion that some local law enforcement people dont want to exercise this authority. Well, were not saying that they have to. But if they want to and they can assist in fighting the war on terror, thats what this opinion allows us to do.
Personally, I would worry about a policy that permits someone, a local law enforcement official, to use this authority somehow as a club to harass -- they might be undocumented aliens, but otherwise lawful citizens. That would be troubling. That would be troubling to the president who, as a governor of a -- former governor of a border state understands and appreciates the roles that immigrants and undocumented aliens play in our society.
But it is in litigation, and it would probably be better if I didnt speak more about that."
Apparently it is all right to be an illegal alien, as long as you are otherwise a "law-abiding citizen."
Maybe I could be a swindler, or a burglar, but otherwise a "law-abiding citizen." Why pick on me because of my one little illegality?
The argument seems to be that it is too much of a challenge and a bother for the police to have to enforce the laws, and they get along better with ethnic communities if they just leave them alone for some home-grown mafia to run.
I'm praying for Bush to slip and play the race card, but knowing that he can be disciplined at times it will probably be some of the OBL henchmen who slip that perjoritive into the debate.
Kennedy, Leahy, and Specter. I didn't even want to read this, but I did.
Gonzales is a disaster. Anyone who kisses Kennedy's rear end isn't fit to be elected dog catcher...
Yeah, and if you think Gonzales is going to fire those radical fag DoJ lawyers who perpetrated the "Philadelphia Four" you can forget it. We wouldn't want to jeopardize the crucial "Log Cabin" voting bloc (all 12 of them).
This needs to be repeated because it's true! Why don't more people realize this?
FYI
Going Underground - Barron's
The shadow economy is about to top $1 trillion -- at a great cost to many
By JIM MCTAGUE
AMERICA HAS TWO ECONOMIES, and one is flourishing at the expense of the
other. First, there's the legitimate economy, in which craftsmen are
licensed and employers and employees pay taxes.
Then there's the fast-growing underground economy, where millions of nannies, construction workers and others are paid off-the-books, their incomes largely untaxed.
The best guess as to the size of the output of this shadow economy is about $970 billion, or nearly 9% that of the real economy. It should soon pass $1 trillion.
What is largely fueling the underground economy, experts say, is the
nation's swelling ranks of low-wage illegal immigrants. -snip-very long.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.romanian/browse_thread/thread/1bb41897c2797fca/a037432e6e83160d?q=%22The+Underground+Labor+Force+Is+Rising+to+the+Surface%22&_done=/groups?q=%22The+Underground+Labor+Force+Is+Rising+to+the+Surface%22%252
That tells us everything we need to know about you.
Namely, that he discerns reality far better than you do?
By the way, your "anecdote" has got to be one of the biggest fish stories I've heard in a long time. Tells us all that anyone needs to know about you.
Amazing --- an AG who doesn't know what the definition of "citizen" is --- unles they've already redefined it to mean "world citizen" --- who are under the authority of "world government". This guy sounds like a very dangerous globalist.
FYI, in case you missed it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1316831/posts?q=1&&page=1
L.A. Mexican congressional office may not be legal
L.A. Daily News ^ | 1/7/04 | Rachel Uranga
Posted on 01/08/2005 1:08:02 PM PST
You made your accusation in response to my post #8.
What part of post #8 is a lie?
Read my post #35 and either you or your friend is telling a bald faced lie!
You might have known Louis LeMont, he lived between Conroe and Huntsville.
Skuze me? He's gonna start this crap already... They're actually gonna do it....going to push us from dissent to outright rebellion.
The American public has been greatly "misunderestimated" if a few of these OBL's believe we will just shut up and let this invasion continue.
What?? Are you saying Bay hasn't had dinner with Kay Bailey and all those others he's mentioned before??
FROBL?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1314180/posts
I met Atwater, Bush Sr., Henry Kissinger and quite a few others while serving as head of security for Nashville's City Club during their Distinguished Lecture series. Mr. Atwater struck me as a man consumed by a mission to relegate liberals to the "dustbin of history", having known far too many wastrel idiots in his musician circle spouting nonsense. That such a driven and focused young man as he would voluntarily seek the advice we hear coming out of Rod is utterly laughable.
Blech!
I be saying exactly that.
Between his having had hundreds of employees, owning restaurants, kibitzing with front page politicians, and what ever other exploits he's claimed to have done,
bayourod would have to be about 150 years old, by my calculations!
He also holds a very low opinion of blue collar jobs, and or what most minorities might aspire to be in life.
In bayourods own words:
See here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1301995/replies?c=67
We see brown skinned men building our highways, repairing our autos, replacing our roofs, mowing our lawns, washing our cars, serving our dinners, collecting our trash,
Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302385/replies?c=145
Here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302385/replies?c=138
And here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1302385/replies?c=54
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.