Posted on 01/08/2005 5:36:28 PM PST by Jim Robinson
THE world may be better off if Osama Bin Laden remains at large, according to the Central Intelligence Agency’s recently departed executive director. If the world’s most wanted terrorist is captured or killed, a power struggle among his Al-Qaeda subordinates may trigger a wave of terror attacks, said AB “Buzzy” Krongard, who stepped down six weeks ago as the CIA’s third most senior executive.
“You can make the argument that we’re better off with him (at large),” Krongard said. “Because if something happens to Bin Laden, you might find a lot of people vying for his position and demonstrating how macho they are by unleashing a stream of terror.”
Krongard, a former investment banker who joined the CIA in 1998, said Bin Laden’s role among Islamic militants was changing.
“He’s turning into more of a charismatic leader than a terrorist mastermind,” he said. “Some of his lieutenants are the ones to worry about.”
Krongard, 68, said he viewed Bin Laden “not as a chief executive but more like a venture capitalist”.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
They need to put this guy on trial for treason!
Speaks volumes about the current level of incompetence that abides on the farm.
Unbelievable!
Well, you beat me to it.
In one word, idiocy
Little wonder why the CIA dropped the ball before 911. Unbelievable.
Hmmmm, while I may want Bin Laden to achieve room temperature; this is an intriguing train of thought.
Alive, Al Quaeda is a 'known' quantity; but with Bin Laden out of the picture, there will be chaos. So which is truly worse; a man with a demonstrated capability to wield financial planning, terrorism and gov't corruption to his will to achieve his goals; or a staff of semi-competitent terrorist-leader wannabes each tring to out do their peers.
WHAT ???????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
'Buzzy' ? .. I should say so.
It might be a pre-cleared planted "information" to confuse those who really need to be confused. Thus a treason trial seems a bit premature.
The trick would then be to get Bin Laden and his his lieutenants at the same get together.
More than likely it is an insight into the incompetent mindset that Goss is busily ridding the CIA of.
This guy sounds like he was one of the leakers to the NY Slimes .
Arrest this guy for treason!
There are two lines of thought here....
One, this man is assuming that any of Bin Laden's lieutenants would be more capable of arranging, coordinating and executing a terrorist attack better than UBL himself. I am not so sure about that one...
Two, this is assuming that we also don't keep bagging the senior LTs that do have the skills and capabilities to do so.
Decapitating Al Qaeda won't kill it, but if you take enough of the neck with the head, they are no more than any other regional terrorist organization like Ansar Al Islam or Hamas...UBL is able to project his terror unlike any other terrorista since well, I am not sure who....
There are points to the positive in either suggestion. I think a treason trial is over-reacting though....
And as we all know, Venture Capitalists are parasites.
He's sort of right. One such power struggle has already taken place between Zarqawi and Bin Laden. The tapes that were released of Bin Laden were intended to stall the inner squabbling in Al Qaeda.
I suspect that Bin Laden is being held by Iran or by a group in Iran that is trying to get a grip on Al Qaeda, or if they decide that Al Qaeda is organizationally defunct, they will use him as a bargaining chip in negotiations with the U.S. or other terrorist organizations.
Al Zarqawi's coup attempt failed. Bin Laden remains the nominal head of the terrorist network. The network is scattered, its communication and funds disrupted. Operation has almost entirely fallen to local cell leaders.
This guy is only sort of right because killing bin Laden now won't trigger too much infighting in AQ because... frankly there just isn't much to fight over. There would be demonstration attacks, but very few, and almost entirely in the Middle East because there's no chance cell leaders in the more developed countries are going to risk martyrdom for someone less charismatic than Osama.
So this guy is doing the usual CIA blustering to undermine this administration, and to fan the flames of militant extremism, which is all this story is going to do.
I'm all for tossing him the brig for treason, and having a party to draw and quarter him... but we could just turn him loose in Baghdad and see who he leads us to.
Fake news from 1969
THE world may be better off if Charles Manson remains at large, according to the LAPD's recently departed director. If the US’s most wanted terrorist is captured or killed, a power struggle among his Family subordinates may trigger a wave of terror attacks, said “Buzzy” who stepped down six weeks ago as the LAPD's third most senior executive.
“You can make the argument that we’re better off with him (at large),” he said. “Because if something happens to Charlie, you might find a lot of people vying for his position and demonstrating how loyal they are by unleashing a stream of terror.”
end of sarcasm news>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.