Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2005 11:20:31 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: kattracks

Yea!! Check out that Washington State Governors election!!
It stinks of corruption!!


2 posted on 01/06/2005 11:26:06 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Her blatant move to suck up to the DUmmies was embarassingly hamhanded. She does not have her hubby's political skills, and this has no doubt emboldened some in her party who thought she would have the nomination for the asking. Nice move, Hil!


3 posted on 01/06/2005 11:26:32 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Annoying wussies since 1965)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

HILLARY LOSES HER WAY

You can't lose what you never had.


6 posted on 01/06/2005 11:38:28 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; Darkwolf377; superskunk; MeekOneGOP; All

But: has she listened to her husband's opinion about the vote? Clinton-dildon said that the victory of G. W. Bush was fair, without any fraud. I know, we don't need their opinion, but it's really distressing to assist to such baloneys.


7 posted on 01/06/2005 11:38:43 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Hillary is pre-emptively covering her sizable ass. As '08
gets closer some will level charges that the '04 election
turned out pretty much the way she wanted it which gives
her a turn at bat. Tossing balls to the fans is one way to
show that she is a team player. Joining Babs ('My girl-
friend can't wrestle but you ought to see her box')Boxer
gives her some legitimacy when she campaigns on the "fair
elections" platform. Yes, Hillary can never be accused of
not having balls.


9 posted on 01/06/2005 11:43:11 PM PST by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Its a strange day when Chuckie Schumer is more rational than Hillary.


15 posted on 01/06/2005 11:59:33 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

After Schumer got done Hillary probably felt like she got a wedgie.


18 posted on 01/07/2005 12:19:57 AM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Weiner is no moron. That leaves shameful cynic.

He also presumes to run against Mayor Bloomberg this fall, and clearly sees benefit in a pander to his party's wacko wing.

I think we can all agree the reason why Hillary, and a handful of rats, embarked on this futile obstruction was to placate their base. They need to do this to raise money. They can thank Moore and Moveon for this self destructive act.

Schumer owes President Clinton
Clinton making one last effort for Schumer in New York - 10/30/98 WASHINGTON -- President Clinton Friday hurls himself into the middle of one of the nastiest and most expensive Senate races as he tries to convince New York voters that Charles Schumer, not Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, should be their second senator.

Schumer just won reelection with 71% of the vote. That is why he was chosen to mute Hillary. Schumer and Hillary are buddies. Schumer just elevated Hillary to the status of godlike to the left fringe. She bravely fought for the fundamental right to vote even against the barbs and taunts of her turncoat party. She's an outsider!!!

With enemies like Schumer...Who needs friends?

20 posted on 01/07/2005 1:35:49 AM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio." ....Earth to Hilly!!!...your a good one to talk about integrity!!!...sniff my shorts!


22 posted on 01/07/2005 3:03:22 AM PST by Route101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

The recent recounts and the challenge to the confirmation of Bush's victory were not undertaken by the Democrats to achieve true counts, but to provide cover for the Democrats for past, present and future frauds. The Democrats are attempting to create a lasting impression that Republicans are solely responsible for imperfect elections.


24 posted on 01/07/2005 3:49:48 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

The recent recounts and the challenge to the confirmation of Bush's victory were not undertaken by the Democrats to achieve true counts, but to provide cover for the Democrats for past, present and future frauds. The Democrats are attempting to create a lasting impression that Republicans are solely responsible for imperfect elections.


25 posted on 01/07/2005 3:51:44 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; Darkwolf377
Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio."

Hannity and Rush are wrong about this, I think.

She's not sucking up to the DUmmies.

This is part of a carefully thought out, post-Florida 2000 strategy to discredit simple arithmetical counting of real votes by legal voters as the cast-iron bottom line of who wins and who loses.

What the real leaders of Boxer's silly little tantrum seek is twofold: First, that people wake up the day after an election, with all the votes counted, and say "I wonder who really won?"

Second, the proliferation of laws for election contests, ballot challenges, election courts and election judges. They want to put elections under the direct control of the Federal government unstead of under the unreviewable control of the People in their localities.

The reason they want this is simple: It's much easier for them to prevail in the courts or in a protracted, lawyer-driven "post-election" process than it is on election day.

It was insanity to collaborate in the "Help America Vote Act" to fix fictitious problems with the Florida 2000 vote. The only problem in Florida was that the democrats lost, and lacked the post-election cheating tools to recover in time.

NOW, they are willing to try to discredit a 100 000+ vote win, while affirming their 100-vote win in WA as sacrosanct.

This is going to get worse and worse, no doubt with the help of stupid Congressional Republicans.

There are no problems with the voting.

There are no problems with the voting.

There are no problems with the voting.

27 posted on 01/07/2005 4:01:54 AM PST by Jim Noble (Colgate '72)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
her party's moonbat "They-Stole-Ohio" caucus

her flirtation with the grassy-knoll commandos of her party's left wing

Good descriptions by the Post Editor, but I liked Tom Delay's most of all - "THE X-FILE WING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY".

Unbeatable, IMO!


31 posted on 01/07/2005 4:41:39 AM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Weiner — and Sen. Clinton — need to get a little perspective. It's not always about winning.

Maybe to the editors of the New York Post it's not. To hillary it is.

hillary may be a total witch and a totalitarian bitch but there is no doubt she and her assembled court-in-waiting is a crafty one. She doesn't tilt with windmills. She runs them.

She is making herself all things to all people plus setting a precedent for her run in 2008. If she loses in the polls it may be possible she can win it all in the Congress if the Democrats can get their majorities back. This little flap will be long forgotten and buried by the time 2008 rolls around - but the precedent won't.

This sets a precedent - a good one - for her to gain her ambitions!

34 posted on 01/07/2005 5:53:20 AM PST by Gritty ("The Clintons always pretend 'Monica' is their only scandal-Peggy Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I hope no one finds her! </sarcasm


36 posted on 01/07/2005 6:09:48 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; Richard Poe; bear11; Jim Robinson

.

America's Enemy Within HILLARY was on the side of our Terrrorist Enemy Communist Vietnam Dictator HO CHI MINH and against US during the Vietnam War.

During the 1990's HILLARY's White House refused 3 Free Offers from the Sudan to hand over our Terrorist Enemy OSAMA bin LADEN to US on a silver platter. Offers if taken would have prevented the Attacks of September 11, 2001 ahead of time.

The day after HILLARY won her New York Senate Seat in 2000 she vowed to destroy our Electoral College System.

Senator BOXER, who personally lead Anti-U.S. Demonstrations to shut down the City Government of San Francisco during the Vietnam War, is merely a voicebox for HILLARY.

Read RICHARD POE's outstanding book:

'HILLARY's Secret War: The CLINTONS Conspiracy to Muzzle Internet Journalists'

...WE on the Internet...

....REMEMBER EVERYTHING,

.....and HILLARY knows it..!!!

.


37 posted on 01/07/2005 6:11:52 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
* Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity, and they are not confined to . . . Ohio."

I find no fault in this statement except that it includes Ohio. Let's look at elections in WA, WI, PA and other states where Kerry and other Dems won by a tiny fractional margin.

40 posted on 01/07/2005 6:47:58 AM PST by TigersEye (Free speech! It's not just for Democrats anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Said Schumer: "My view is that you don't hold up the election unless there is concrete real evidence of fraud. I haven't seen that."

Yo, Chuckie-baby, have you looked at the State of Washington lately?
41 posted on 01/07/2005 6:53:26 AM PST by Beckwith (John, you said I was going to be the First Lady. As of now, you're on the couch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Said Clinton: "As we look at our election system"

There she goes again, tacitly suggesting the electoral college isn't a viable way to elect a POTUS. What a wretched human being, I can see nothings changed about her since she was elected Senator of N.Y. State, not that I expected any change mind you.

48 posted on 01/07/2005 2:58:03 PM PST by Pagey (Hillary talking about the bible,is as hypocritical as Bill carrying one out of church for 8 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

.....and they are not confined to . . . Ohio.....

She was of course making reference to the criminally corrupt city of Philadelphia.


51 posted on 01/07/2005 4:50:11 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson