Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Questioned on Gonzales Memos
GOPUSA ^ | January 5, 2005 | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 01/05/2005 2:43:02 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

WASHINGTON (Talon News) -- The nomination of White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to become the next U.S. attorney general continues to draw scrutiny from Democrats and members of the media. At Tuesday's White House press briefing, Press Secretary Scott McClellan was asked why the White House hasn't released opinions drafted by Gonzales regarding detainees in the war on terror.

A reporter questioned McClellan on a statement issued on Tuesday by a group of former officers which called on the White House "to release documents regarding the decisions that Mr. Gonzales has made in his role as legal counsel of the president, especially with regard to the detainees and to the period going into the Iraq war."

"Is the White House willing to release these documents to give the Senate the ability to judge Mr. Gonzales' attitude towards the law [and] toward [the] Constitution," the reporter asked.

"First of all, I saw a number of these individuals are people that supported the campaign of the president's opponent," McClellan noted. "So let's keep that in mind when we're talking about these individuals."

McClellan added, "[A] number of the documents that I think you might be referring to have been made available publicly. In fact, Judge Gonzales participated in a briefing with Department of Defense officials to talk about some of those very documents I think you're referring to. And we've also responded to some inquiries from the Senate Judiciary Committee, as well."

The White House press secretary said that Judge Gonzales "looks forward to going before the committee later this week and participating in his hearing."

"[W]e hope the Senate will move forward quickly on his nomination," McClellan said. "He is someone who has done an outstanding job for the President here as White House Counsel, and we know he will make a great Attorney General."

Gonzales is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. Gonzales, in working with the Justice Department, aiding in the drafting of several opinions and directives on the handling of terror suspects. As Fox News reports, one directive "argued that Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters were exempt from provisions in the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit torture, violence and degrading treatment."

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chairman of the subcommittee on the Constitution, said Tuesday that critics of the administration this week have "resurrected a familiar straw man in their attack against the nomination of Judge Gonzales to serve as U.S. attorney general."

"Despite a good faith effort by the Bush administration to provide Senate Democrats with all relevant information on the nomination, critics continue to expand the scope of their demands, and then cavil loudly about the administration¹s 'secrecy' and 'refusals' when the goal posts are moved," Cornyn said.

Cornyn agreed with the Bush administration's position on the release of further information and said that preserving the confidentiality of war memoranda -- such as those that some Senate Democrats are asking to be made public -- is critical, "as unwarranted disclosure can be particularly dangerous." Cornyn added that many of the memos in question involve "some of the most sensitive and important aspects of the war against terrorism."

"It would be dangerous and unthinkable to demand that the United States government announce publicly its military strategy for targeting enemies and enemy locations in wartime," Cornyn said. "Such a disclosure would give the enemy a roadmap for predicting, preventing, and thwarting an attack, and would dramatically increase the risk of injury and death to members of our military."

Sen. Cornyn added. "It is equally dangerous to demand that the United States government announce publicly its military strategy for conducting interrogations of enemy combatants, as it would undermine our efforts to obtain actionable military intelligence from enemy combatant detainees."

Copyright © 2005 Talon News -- All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: albertogonzales; alqaeda; confirmation; genevaconventions; iraq; memos; msm; pows; terrorists; torture; unlawfulcombatants; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
As I understand it, the ruckus over Gonzales's nomination stems from a couple of memos he was involved with, one that questions Geneva Convention protections for "unlawful combatants" and one that apparently redefines torture to exclude such antics as making a cell too hot or too cold, for example.

Seems to me that the humans-in-name-only that we're fighting, while being humans in name only, are technically prisoners of war and are entitled to Geneva Convention protections. I'll admit that I personally don't want these savages to have their own dormitories, athletic facilities, etc., as is apparently mandated under the Geneva Conventions (or some people's interpretation of them), but we must be consistent. Am I wrong here?

Also, apparently some interrogators are being a little over-enthusiastic under the redefinition of torture. I read about one instance in which a prisoner was made so hot he was pulling out his own hair.

1 posted on 01/05/2005 2:43:07 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; alisasny; AnnaSASsyFR; Angelwood; aristeides; Askel5; basil; bayliving; ..

Gonzales is in a mess PING!


2 posted on 01/05/2005 2:45:14 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No, he is not.


3 posted on 01/05/2005 2:45:56 PM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This tactic by the Democrat's will get the GOP many Spanish/American votes in 2006/08! Gotta love these idiots.
4 posted on 01/05/2005 2:48:47 PM PST by rocksblues (RINO's = McCain, Lott, Collins, Hagel, Coleman, Specter, Frist ! developing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No, the ruckus over Gonzales' has little to do with memos. It has to do with undermining Bush's appointees in the Judiciary and Law enforcement.

If Ashcroft was as fierce as thought, he should have opened up investigations on Pardonguilt, FBI recordgate, etc. He should have been forceful in the Jamie Gorelick memo wall as well as her role on the 9/11 commission.

It Bush gets anyone in Justice with Huevos, then guys like Leahy might be in trouble for real for once!

After all, Sandy Berger still has not been arrested and here he is stealing classified documents! Criminal Theft of classified info! And still walking free!


5 posted on 01/05/2005 2:51:02 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If they want Geneva protections, they can carry a Geneva Conventions Identification Card. I have one. Otherwise, it's against the Law of Land Warfare and you catch whatever you get.

War isn't for sissies or lawyers. It sucks, and it hurts. Folks die. Get a grip.

/john

6 posted on 01/05/2005 2:52:16 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

"...scrutiny from Democrats and members of the media."
And how are these different groups? Sheeesh.


7 posted on 01/05/2005 2:53:05 PM PST by Shisan ("The law is the true embodiment of everything that's excellent...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

If Leahy does'nt like Gonzales then I'm all for him. nuff said.


8 posted on 01/05/2005 2:53:17 PM PST by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

Not necessarily.
GOP are getting the hispanic votes because Bush courted them. He won't do anything to stop the early warning about a tsunami flood of illegals.
This nomination is to get the hispanic votes.

They are alienating a larger loyal base of conservatives to run after the minority vote.


9 posted on 01/05/2005 2:54:35 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seems to me that the humans-in-name-only that we're fighting, while being humans in name only, are technically prisoners of war and are entitled to Geneva Convention protections. I'll admit that I personally don't want these savages to have their own dormitories, athletic facilities, etc., as is apparently mandated under the Geneva Conventions (or some people's interpretation of them), but we must be consistent. Am I wrong here?

Technically, the detainees are NOT prisioners of war. They were not uniformed members of an opposing army. Geneva Conventions do not apply. Politically, this is nothing more than a Bush bashing witchhunt by the Demonrats. Gonzales will be confirmed by the full Senate IMHO.

10 posted on 01/05/2005 2:58:35 PM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Pull my fingernails out for this, but TORTURE CAN MAKE PEOPLE ADMIT TO THINGS THEY DIDN'T DO.


11 posted on 01/05/2005 3:02:24 PM PST by followerofchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Exactly so, John and thanks for reminding us.


12 posted on 01/05/2005 3:12:05 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: followerofchrist

Yep.


13 posted on 01/05/2005 3:20:27 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
If the democrats want to talk about memos, I think the GOP should accomodate them.

RNC Blasts Dems,CBS on MemoGate

White House Links Memos, Kerry Effort......

Another Special Prosecutor (Senate Judiciary Committee Memos

There Are More Democrat Memos

Leaked Memo Sparks Rancor In Senate (Rockefeller, Senate Intelligence Committee Memo)

14 posted on 01/05/2005 3:25:13 PM PST by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ted Olson on Hardball kicking rear!

When Chrissy asked why so many military are against Gonzales, Olson flat out said they're partisans, most of whom worked for Kerry's campaign. He said "they're wrong".

He is expounding more, giving facts and figures.

Go, Ted!


15 posted on 01/05/2005 4:13:55 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Howlin, Ted Olson is doing a great job on Spitball right now!


16 posted on 01/05/2005 4:15:25 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: followerofchrist

Your point is irrelevant to this discussion.


17 posted on 01/05/2005 4:18:23 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

"Despite a good faith effort by the Bush administration to provide Senate Democrats with all relevant information on the nomination, critics continue to expand the scope of their demands, and then cavil loudly about the administration¹s 'secrecy' and 'refusals' when the goal posts are moved," Cornyn said, after taking repeatedly good, long, pulls on his crack pipe.

Alberto Josef Mengele Gonzalez


18 posted on 01/05/2005 4:19:32 PM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: cyncooper

I was just listening to that; I hope he testifies!


20 posted on 01/05/2005 4:38:17 PM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson