Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In the beginning . . . Adam walked with dinosaurs [Creationist Park]
Telegraph.co.uk ^ | 02 January 2005 | James Langton

Posted on 01/02/2005 12:20:11 PM PST by PatrickHenry

With its towering dinosaurs and a model of the Grand Canyon, America's newest tourist attraction might look like the ideal destination for fans of the film Jurassic Park.

The new multi-million-dollar Museum of Creation, which will open this spring in Kentucky, will, however, be aimed not at film buffs, but at the growing ranks of fundamentalist Christians in the United States.

It aims to promote the view that man was created in his present shape by God, as the Bible states, rather than by a Darwinian process of evolution, as scientists insist.

The centrepiece of the museum is a series of huge model dinosaurs, built by the former head of design at Universal Studios, which are portrayed as existing alongside man, contrary to received scientific opinion that they lived millions of years apart.

Other exhibits include images of Adam and Eve, a model of Noah's Ark and a planetarium demonstrating how God made the Earth in six days.

The museum, which has cost a mighty $25 million (£13 million) will be the world's first significant natural history collection devoted to creationist theory. It has been set up by Ken Ham, an Australian evangelist, who runs Answers in Genesis, one of America's most prominent creationist organisations. He said that his aim was to use tourism, and the theme park's striking exhibits, to convert more people to the view that the world and its creatures, including dinosaurs, were created by God 6,000 years ago.

"We want people to be confronted by the dinosaurs," said Mr Ham. "It's going to be a first class experience. Visitors are going to be hit by the professionalism of this place. It is not going to be done in an amateurish way. We are making a statement."

The museum's main building was completed recently, and work on the entrance exhibit starts this week. The first phase of the museum, which lies on a 47-acre site 10 miles from Cincinatti on the border of Kentucky and Ohio, will open in the spring.

Market research companies hired by the museum are predicting at least 300,000 visitors in the first year, who will pay $10 (£5.80) each.

Among the projects still to be finished is a reconstruction of the Grand Canyon, purportedly formed by the swirling waters of the Great Flood – where visitors will "gape" at the bones of dinosaurs that "hint of a terrible catastrophe", according to the museum's publicity.

Mr Ham is particularly proud of a planned reconstruction of the interior of Noah's Ark. "You will hear the water lapping, feel the Ark rocking and perhaps even hear people outside screaming," he said.

More controversial exhibits deal with diseases and famine, which are portrayed not as random disasters, but as the result of mankind's sin. Mr Ham's Answers in Genesis movement blames the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School in Colorado, in which two teenagers killed 12 classmates and a teacher before killing themselves, on evolutionist teaching, claiming that the perpetrators believed in Darwin's survival of the fittest.

Other exhibits in the museum will blame homosexuals for Aids. In a "Bible Authority Room" visitors are warned: "Everyone who rejects his history – including six-day creation and Noah's flood – is `wilfully' ignorant.''

Elsewhere, animated figures will be used to recreate the Garden of Eden, while in another room, visitors will see a tyrannosaurus rex pursuing Adam and Eve after their fall from grace. "That's the real terror that Adam's sin unleashed," visitors will be warned.

A display showing ancient Babylon will deal with the Tower of Babel and "unravel the origin of so-called races'', while the final section will show the life of Christ, as an animated angel proclaims the coming of the Saviour and a 3D depiction of the crucifixion.

In keeping with modern museum trends, there will also be a cafe with a terrace to "breathe in the fresh air of God's creation'', and a shop "crammed'' with creationist souvenirs, including T-shirts and books such as A is for Adam and Dinky Dinosaur: Creation Days.

The museum's opening will reinforce the burgeoning creationist movement and evangelical Christianity in the US, which gained further strength with the re-election of President Bush in November.

Followers of creationism have been pushing for their theories to be reintegrated into American schoolroom teaching ever since the celebrated 1925 "Scopes Monkey Trial", when US courts upheld the right of a teacher to use textbooks that included evolutionary theory.

In 1987, the US Supreme Court reinforced that position by banning the teaching of creationism in public schools on the grounds of laws that separate state and Church.

Since then, however, many schools – particularly in America's religious Deep South – have got around the ban by teaching the theory of "intelligent design", which claims that evolutionary ideas alone still leave large gaps in understanding.

"Since President Bush's re-election we have been getting more membership applications than we can handle,'' said Mr Ham, who expects not just the devout, but also the curious, to flock through the turnstiles. "The evolutionary elite will be getting a wake-up call."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: creationism; cretinism; crevolist; darwin; evolution; kenham; themepark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940941-959 last
To: D Edmund Joaquin
"yes, I do, the Flintstones."

So, you think that a cartoon is more authoritative than 150 years of scientific discovery. I thought so. You now have no credibility in this debate at all. I suspect you are simply trying to get my goat, so that you can get rid of the most educated and formidable opponent you have ever come across.

I know the Bible and theology better than anyone on the creationist side and of course since creationists know zero science, it is no contest.
941 posted on 01/08/2005 12:45:08 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

"No I'm proving that you are not a Christian."

That in itself doesn't seem very Christian of you. ;-)


942 posted on 01/08/2005 12:46:34 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: shubi

Shubi, I know you're lonely, and I like you, really I do, but your nonsense re bible interpretation is tiresome. Even a newborn Christian has more understanding than you do. If you can give me a cogent explaination of what the Ark was I'll continue to talk to you


943 posted on 01/08/2005 12:48:58 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

The Ark is a fairy tale made up generations before the Bible was published. A few of the details were changed to make it more Jewish.

It is my first choice for deletion from the Bible. It keeps many people from taking Christianity seriously. This is especially true when people like AIG batter people with it, threaten them and get angry when everyone thinks they are looney.


944 posted on 01/08/2005 9:33:16 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 943 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

Not lonely, btw. LOL


945 posted on 01/09/2005 4:26:11 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 943 | View Replies]

To: shubi

No Shubi, that is a completely wrong answer and is really and truly why I can't take seriously all the claims that you make.


946 posted on 01/09/2005 11:08:32 AM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]

To: shubi

that's good, lol


947 posted on 01/09/2005 11:10:31 AM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 945 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

Perhaps if you would give your views of the Ark, it might enlighten me.


948 posted on 01/09/2005 11:48:31 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies]

To: shubi

Well that's where the rubber hits the road, shubi. These things are spiritually discerned, I can't enlighten you. It's wisdom from above. If you are a Christian, and you study and you pray. it will likely come to you.


949 posted on 01/09/2005 12:03:33 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 948 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

So, I assume you have no discernment in this matter.

The Spirit informs me that my previous posts are correct. There is no reason for the Ark story to be in the Bible, other than to scare people into believing in the Almighty.
That seems more of an Islamic doctrine than a Christian one.

In fact, the Ark story is more pagan than Christian and would appeal to Islam.


950 posted on 01/09/2005 12:14:22 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 949 | View Replies]

Comment #951 Removed by Moderator

To: ewokese

I guess to let your little kids, who have a child's understanding, run around and play. Is that against the law now too


952 posted on 01/09/2005 12:24:36 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies]

Comment #953 Removed by Moderator

To: ewokese
not to you

ewokese Since Jan 7, 2005

954 posted on 01/09/2005 12:31:40 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 953 | View Replies]

Comment #955 Removed by Moderator

To: ewokese

You're welcome. Try me again in a year or so


956 posted on 01/09/2005 12:37:25 PM PST by D Edmund Joaquin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies]

Comment #957 Removed by Moderator

To: shubi

The antibiotic bacterial citation is assuming the DNA 'changes' took place whereas these previously may have existed in the bacterial population from the git go my friend. You do NOT KNOW what the original DNA pool of these bacterial agents was how could you since you would need to have had someone study every single bacterial organism's dna? You assume their were 'changes' made by mutations while along the bacteria that survive have dna that was there in the beginning.


958 posted on 03/09/2005 9:24:53 AM PST by kkindt (knightforhire.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: kkindt
Evolution is allele changes in populations over time. Whether the mutations took place earlier or later is of no consequence. The alleles that increased in frequency were the ones that provided immunity. That is evolution.

The point of the debate was on beneficial mutations. I explained that sickle cell was beneficial in tropical malarial areas but harmful in temperate zones. Creationists don't seem to be able to comprehend that relativity.
959 posted on 03/09/2005 10:08:08 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940941-959 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson