Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jan Egeland biography (pays no income tax)
UN ^ | Dec. 30, 2004 | JohnCliftn

Posted on 12/29/2004 9:50:28 PM PST by JohnCliftn

Excerpt from Jan Egeland Biography

Mr Egeland holds a Magister Artium in Political Science, University of Oslo. He has been a Fulbright Scholar at the University of California, Berkeley and a fellow at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, and the Truman Institute for the Advancement for Peace, Jerusalem. Mr. Egeland has been Chair of Amnesty International, Norway, and Vice Chair of the International Executive Committee of Amnesty International.

Which means he gets a gross salary of UnderSecretaryGeneral|Gross $186,144 but pays no Income Taxes for I quote from the link:

Income taxes: Most member states have granted United Nations staff exemption from national income taxation on their United Nations emoluments. However, a few member States do tax the emoluments of their nationals. In such cases, the organizations reimburse the income tax to the staff member.

which means even if he does pay income taxes the UN reimburses him!

(Excerpt) Read more at unisdr.org ...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amnestyinternational; eurotrash; fulbrightscholar; isdr; janegeland; sumatraquake; un; unisdr; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: shibumi

That's exactly what I thought, but I wish I knew where to FIND THE FACTS of this issue. Like I said, the government doesn't wanna talk about it for some reason. I remember this one guy who held a hunger strike on Capitol Hill until Congress woould finally hear his case, & after a while, they finally agreed to--Rep. Roscoe Bartlett was going to have something to do w/ that. Then Sept. 11th happened, & well........


41 posted on 12/30/2004 12:24:47 AM PST by libertyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: libertyman

http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com


42 posted on 12/30/2004 12:28:02 AM PST by shibumi ("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

Well, what are we gonna do about it--elect members of Congress who will actually GET US OUT of the UN, or cut off its funding come 2006? I may hope so, but I'm not gonna hold my breath: no way will the GOP Establishment make a serious call for that, & even if it did, the Dims would raise ALL KINDS of hell, as would their mouthpiece, the MSM.


43 posted on 12/30/2004 12:32:06 AM PST by libertyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JohnCliftn

Stingy Bump


44 posted on 12/30/2004 12:34:04 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertyman
I may hope so, but I'm not gonna hold my breath: no way will the GOP Establishment make a serious call for that, & even if it did, the Dims would raise ALL KINDS of hell, as would their mouthpiece, the MSM.

The Democrats have be 'raising hell' for the last four years about Bush and republicans and it has only hurt themselves both from monetary and political standpoints.

45 posted on 12/30/2004 2:34:14 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ijcr

Wow! This hypocrit's untaxed salary needs to be the #1 topic on conservative talk radio. Send it to Rush, Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Neal Boortz and they'll get the word out that this liberal turkey wants everyone else to pay for the UN's charity. I think the UN just wants to skim more funds from the tsunami victims as they did from the starving Iraqi children.


46 posted on 12/30/2004 2:53:00 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Aw...so now we know why Kerry conducted that little 'meeting' at the UN that no one seemed to remember him having...he was cruising the halls & picking up checks.


47 posted on 12/30/2004 2:54:12 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: farfromhome

Yep! That's the democratic tagline.


48 posted on 12/30/2004 2:55:06 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnCliftn

A resume that would surely make Mao Tse Tung proud!


49 posted on 12/30/2004 3:04:57 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale

Does he pay taxes in Sweden...

Good question & wish I knew the answer. I would not be surprised if he did not.

Going on foggy recall from 15-16 years ago...a friend was transferred to Aruba from the US, working for a US corporation. According to this friend, he did not pay US income taxes on his salary but he was restricted as to how much time he could spend in the US per annum (a couple of weeks, IIRC), but I don't think there was any restriction as to how long his wife & kids could visit in the US. At such a time as he returned to the US to reside, whatever money he brought back w/ him was then subject to US taxes. Don't recall if he was then req'd to pay taxes in Aruba...long time ago & possibly the rules have changed... Hopefully someone with more current info & info regarding the Swedish system will chime in.

50 posted on 12/30/2004 3:15:54 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: airedale

No. He is Norwegian...and therefore exempt Norwegian taxes if he spends less than six weeks a year in Norway. The same applies to Norwegian Social Security taxes.


51 posted on 12/30/2004 4:10:08 AM PST by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JohnCliftn
I prefer to use the more conservative and indisputable set of figures.Hence using the 2002-2003 tables.That way they cannot shoot down the facts with" the totals given have not yet taken effect","these are just projections",etc,etc.

Another problem is the effective date of the pay hikes, in some departments it is January, some April,some July, and others September.

I would rather be cautious and factual than give the subject a semantic squirm out.
52 posted on 12/30/2004 4:34:46 AM PST by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Saw a clip of him this morning--whining that the relief effort was too slow. Of course, he wasn't in the disaster area with his sleeves rolled up.


53 posted on 12/30/2004 5:15:53 AM PST by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JohnCliftn

The pot that calls the kettle black?


54 posted on 12/30/2004 7:57:06 AM PST by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup

I'm not talking about lowering income taxes, I'm going much further than that: I'm talking about repealing the 16th Amendment of the Constitution altogether (which, IMHO, is illegal to begin with). President Bush's tax cuts, as nice as they are, are just crumbs that have fallen from the table.


55 posted on 12/30/2004 8:20:31 AM PST by libertyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ijcr

Wow. Times that by all the other meaningless diplomats and the numbers are astounding. GET THE UN OUT OF NEW YORK.


56 posted on 12/30/2004 8:22:28 AM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnCliftn

E-mail addresses for Egeland:

Egeland@un.org

lawday@un.org

bunker@un.org


57 posted on 12/30/2004 8:27:43 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnCliftn; ancient_geezer

I am outraged!

The National Retail Sales Tax will not exempt anyone. Every person who makes a purchase in the United State will pay the same tax as every other person -- no exemptions, no rebates!

Yet another reason to support the Fair Tax.


59 posted on 12/30/2004 9:18:17 AM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertyman

Well considering the House Speaker, the Majority Leader, President Bush and a whole lot of republicans in both chambers want to get rid of the IRS, it may just happen.


60 posted on 12/30/2004 11:26:55 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson