Then, using your logic; ANYONE (Buddist, Wiccian, Muslim, Hindu, Satanic, Jewish, et. al) can sue to prevent ANY class from presenting ANY work that some may find offensive.
Just think, what class could you teach that wouldn't have some aspect that may offend some religion.
Or, does this priviledge extend to Christians only?
There is currently a ferocious war being waged by the democrat party against religion in general, and Christianity in particular. The campuses of America are (if you have any awareness) a center for anti-Christian bigotry. The war is being brought into the enemy heartland.
Or, does this priviledge extend to Christians only?
Yes!
You sound like one of these ACLU types who sues for the right of the Nazis to march in Skokie, on free-speech grounds, and then turns around to remove Christian plaques or displays which have been around for decades, because one or two athiests are "offended", all on the grounds of a mythological "separation of Church and State" not mentioned in the Consitution. It's funny how their standards change according to whether Judaism/Christianity is being promoted, or not.
Hint: Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, and wasn't at the Constitutional Convention.
If you are actually concerned about promoting freedom of conscience in religious matters, why don't you look into systematic rape, murder, and human slavery practiced in the Sudan? I haven't noticed many Christians lately webcasting videos of Muslims or Falun Gong adherents having their heads sawn off with a dull knife, while chanting "Merry Christmas! We celebrate the birth of the Prince of Peace!" lately, either.
You "open-minded" types would have a lot more credibility if you were being martyred by Communists and Muslims, like the Christians and Jews are, instead of just jacking off in public in friendly, left-wing settings like the Universities.
Merry Christmas, Troll.
And a proactive Happy Easter!