Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
NY Times ^ | December 22, 2004 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 12/24/2004 6:07:04 PM PST by neverdem

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

Studying these new galaxies could give cosmologists new insights into the processes by which galaxies and stars first formed out of clouds of primordial gas and dust at the beginning of time.

"It's like looking out your window and seeing a dinosaur walk by," said Dr. Tim Heckman of Johns Hopkins University, who led a team using a NASA satellite, the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, or Galex, to pinpoint the newborns. Dr. Heckman spoke in Pasadena, Calif., at a news conference at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the satellite. A paper describing the results has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.

The babies were a pleasant surprise.

Like the parents of a woman of a certain age who long ago gave up hope of grandchildren, astronomers had given up hope that the universe was still producing galaxies that could grow up to be the size of the Milky Way. The heyday of making stars, the active ingredients of galaxies, was five billion to eight billion years ago. Perhaps only dwarf galaxies were being born today.

"We didn't know if there were any newborns still around or if this phase of cosmic creation is over," Dr. Heckman explained.

The baby galaxies appear as bluish blobs of light about 10,000 light-years across in images sent back by the Galex satellite, which was launched in 2003 on a 29-month mission to survey the sky for ultraviolet emissions.

Ultraviolet light, which has a shorter wavelength than visible light, is produced by the hottest, most massive stars, like those of the Pleiades cluster, which shines in the sky above Orion these frigid crystalline nights. Because such stars do not last very long, they are also among the youngest stars in the sky.

As a result, young galaxies stand out in ultraviolet light, said Dr. Chris Martin of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the principal investigator for the Galex project. "Ultraviolet traces star formation," Dr. Martin said.

The hitch for astronomers hoping to study the recent evolution of stars and galaxies is that the atmosphere blocks ultraviolet rays from reaching Earth. So ultraviolet astronomy can be pursued only in space, with instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope and Galex.

Galex is designed to spot the ultraviolet glows of young stars and galaxies and thus help fill in the history of star formation and cosmic evolution over the last 10 billion years. It has a specially designed 20-inch-diameter telescope with a field of view four times as big as a full moon.

The new babies are only the first results of the project, and the astronomers said they expected to find more, although not many.

While they are not nearly the size of mature galaxies like the Milky Way, which is about 100,000 light-years across and has about 200 billion stars, the newborn galaxies outshine them in ultraviolet by a factor of 100 or so, which means they are producing stars "at a prodigious rate," in the words of Dr. Martin.

Dr. Alice Shapley, a theorist at the University of California, described them as "stragglers" of the great wave of galaxy formation that peaked when the universe was half its present age.

It is important, Dr. Shapley said, to try to find out what is finally causing these galaxies to form now. Are they accreting fresh star material from outside, for example? Indeed, she said, astronomers still do not know for sure whether these are really new galaxies, or whether perhaps they are old galaxies, hiding old stars inside them, that are undergoing a new burst of star formation.

These would be ideal objects to study with the Hubble Space Telescope, she added.

What will happen to these newborns is another mystery, Dr. Heckman said.

The infant Milky Way coalesced out of the murk 10 billion years ago, when the universe was more crowded and baby galaxies could bang into one another, merge and grow. "It's less clear what will happen in the future," Dr Heckman said.

The universe is now a more diffuse place, and the baby galaxies may have been born into loneliness. If so, they will never grow up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: galex; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last
To: RadioAstronomer
Whoops, correction This was a 20 minute exposure. M-42 was 3 minutes.

My latest shot of star cluster below is M3. I am pretty proud of this one.

Its one of the most outstanding globular clusters, containing an estimated 500,000 stars. At a distance of about 33,900 light years, it is further away than the center of our Galaxy. The age of globular cluster predates earth and has been estimated at about 20 billion years old.

It was not visible to the unaided eye at my location due to moderate light pollution. This image is a 20 minute exposure, film format, and was processed with Adobe Photoshop, as the raw image had slight light pollution fogging, was slightly out of focus and there were tracking problems

Thought I'd share this too. Merry Christmas and a safe new year to all!


61 posted on 12/24/2004 9:24:04 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
The milky way

Merry Christmas, and sweet dreams.

62 posted on 12/24/2004 9:27:58 PM PST by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Joe, cant see the picture.

Get the dreaded red cross.

Merry Christmas.


63 posted on 12/24/2004 9:33:28 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: XBob

Thanks, XBob.

That sure brings back memories.

Merry Christmas.


64 posted on 12/24/2004 9:34:17 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Baraonda

Because if you ever looked up you would know why they call it the milky way:) If you live in a city or near a major city you can't see the stars when you look up because of the lights.


66 posted on 12/24/2004 9:42:05 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
Sorry about that. I can see them here. Strange. I'll see if I can fix that. They are on my FR profile. Dang computer LOL.

Merry Christmas!

67 posted on 12/24/2004 9:48:18 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Merry Christmas to you, my friend. Always a wonder to watch the skies, ain't it!


68 posted on 12/24/2004 10:13:12 PM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RazzPutin
"Our galaxies are getting farther and farther apart from each other." Really?

Yes, on average.

Then why are we also told that galaxies are always colliding with each other?

Because some of them are.

Imagine an exploding grenade -- as the shrapnel expands outward, most of the pieces are flying away from all the other pieces, yet a few are going to manage to smack into other pieces anyway. Plus with galaxies, gravity tends to bring some together.

69 posted on 12/24/2004 10:13:33 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
I think I fixed it. Let me know if you can see them. Of course I've had a few drinks too...hehe.
70 posted on 12/24/2004 10:13:58 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Thanks for the APOD link. Merry Christmas!


71 posted on 12/24/2004 10:14:35 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
I want to be king of the Galaxy.

The galaxy is on Orion's belt.

72 posted on 12/24/2004 10:16:29 PM PST by Recovering Hermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit
The galaxy is on Orion's belt.

Here, kitty kitty...

73 posted on 12/24/2004 10:22:07 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
bttt and a Merry Christmas to you all.
My very best wishes,
RA

That's it? Just a ping and a "bttt"??? Santa's gonna fill your stocking with coal, Sir!

74 posted on 12/24/2004 10:33:42 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks!

A merry and blessed Christmas to you and your family.

Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

75 posted on 12/24/2004 11:22:13 PM PST by AndrewC (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Quit cryin' over spilled milky way.

Laz. Dude.

76 posted on 12/25/2004 12:14:32 AM PST by Shryke (My Beeb-o-meter goes all the way to eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Thanks, RA, MC to you as well. No photographs have ever moved me more than the deep field ones. Beyond breathtaking.


77 posted on 12/25/2004 12:15:16 AM PST by Shryke (My Beeb-o-meter goes all the way to eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: John Will
Does anyone also think it is our destiny to populate the stars?

No, I do not. The aliens will learn how to fold space before we do. When their star destroyers arrive, they will unleash a massive artillery preparation from space against us. It will saturate every square foot of the Earth's surface with explosives and radiation.

78 posted on 12/25/2004 1:01:39 AM PST by Spandau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Fascinating!


79 posted on 12/25/2004 1:07:13 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

"Our own is simply to large to be explored by us. The fuels are inadequate, the distances are too great and our lifespans are too short."

You have no imagination. The thought of man landing on the moon could not have been conceived 2000 years ago because people did not really know what the moon was.

How do you know that in 2000 more years travelling to the other side of the galaxy might not be as easy and routine as a transatlantic flight?

There is more under heaven and earth than is dreamt of in your philosophy starfish923.


80 posted on 12/25/2004 1:11:30 AM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (By the way, Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson