Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sailor opposed to Iraq war refuses to board ship (ENEMY WITIN OUR BORDERS ALERT!!!)
SignOnSanDiego.com & RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 7 Dec. 2004 | Rick Rogers

Posted on 12/23/2004 11:16:35 AM PST by txradioguy

Petty Officer 3rd Class Pablo Paredes followed through on his plan: He refused to board his Navy ship yesterday morning when it sailed for Iraq with thousands of Camp Pendleton Marines.

For nearly two hours, the weapons-control technician sat on his ship's pier at the 32nd Street Naval Station. He talked with media and waited to be arrested, but the arrest didn't happen.

A Navy spokesman said Paredes, 23, wasn't taken into custody because he hadn't violated any regulations. Navy procedures stipulate that an officer can't be listed as missing until an official roll has been called aboard ship.

"Paredes is considered (to be) in an unauthorized absent status," said Cmdr. William Fenick, spokesman for the 3rd Fleet. "He is encouraged to check into any naval facility as soon as possible. Sailors have an obligation to get under way when their ships deploy, and today over 5,000 sailors and Marines met that obligation and began their deployment."

Paredes believes he wasn't detained because of the media presence. On Sunday, he had called newspapers and radio and TV stations to announce his anti-deployment intentions.

Paredes had planned to publicly throw his military I.D. into the ocean to underscore his stand against the war. But yesterday, he changed his mind after learning that he could be charged with destruction of government property.

Paredes held firm, however, when a Navy officer tried to persuade him to board the amphibious assault ship Bonhomme Richard, which transports Marines to the Middle East.

"I told him that I don't plan on getting under way, that I refuse, that I resign," Paredes said yesterday afternoon in a phone interview.

Paredes had joined the Navy in 2000. He was stationed in Japan until now, he said, and didn't think he had a direct connection to the war in Iraq.

Paredes might be the first local sailor to refuse deployment on the grounds of being philosophically opposed to the Iraq war, said Sam Samuelson, spokesman for the San Diego Naval Station.

Paredes is looking for a lawyer to represent him for free before he turns himself in to the Navy.

"I knew what was coming," Paredes said, "and now I just have to see it through."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; iraq; navy; oif; pabloparedes; treason; warprotestors; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: txradioguy

After having done a little time on board, IMHO all they need to do is turn him over to a Chief, and turn their heads for a few minutes. Old CPO's know full well how to handle problems like this. Whats left will then do time in the brig run by Marines. That will get his attention.


61 posted on 12/23/2004 1:34:52 PM PST by Jarhead1957 (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

Oh they will, and since most of these organizations are updated versions of the same crud-types that were doing the same during the Vietnam war I feel safe in betting that there are already files on them.


62 posted on 12/23/2004 3:29:42 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
881. ART. 81. CONSPIRACY
Any person subject to this chapter who conspires with any other person to commit an offense under this chapter shall, if one or more of the conspirators does an act to effect the object of the conspiracy, be punished as a court-martial may direct. (Conspired with media)

866. ART. 86. ABSENCE WITHOUT LEAVE
Any member of the armed forces who, without authority--
(1) fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed;
(2) goes from that place; or
(3) absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

63 posted on 12/23/2004 3:37:16 PM PST by In veno, veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RushLake
No offense, but last I heard, the Marines were looking for a few good men...not some wimp traitor.
You got that right. This guy wouldn't make a pimple on a good Marine's ass.
Semper Fi...

64 posted on 12/23/2004 3:47:07 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas

eeeeYUP! Two more to pile on.


65 posted on 12/23/2004 7:22:15 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

I can understand that, but having some Marines kick this guy's ass is better than sitting around in a jail cell reading books. Leavenworth at hard labor works, too.


66 posted on 12/23/2004 8:18:45 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Gun-control is leftist mind-control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson