Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force General Punished for Sex Affairs
Reuters ^ | 23 Dec 04 | Will Dunham

Posted on 12/23/2004 7:05:18 AM PST by jagusafr

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Air Force's former chief military lawyer has been formally reprimanded for conduct unbecoming an officer because of improper relationships with more than a dozen women, the Air Force said on Wednesday.

Maj. Gen. Thomas Fiscus was given a formal reprimand and ordered to forfeit pay for conduct unbecoming an officer, fraternization, obstruction of justice and violating a lawful general regulation, the Air Force said.

In violation of military rules, Fiscus had sexual affairs over the last decade with more than a dozen female officers, enlisted women and civilians, an investigation found.

These affairs generally were consensual, and any other incidents were minor cases of inappropriate touching, investigators found.

Gen. Donald Cook, commander of the Air Education and Training Command, decided the punishment in the case and also recommended that Fiscus be compelled to retire from the military at a lower rank, officials said.

Fiscus, who oversaw 1,300 military lawyers and 300 civilian lawyers, as well as 1,000 military paralegals and 600 other civilian workers, could face additional action, including being disbarred, officials said.

Fiscus served as judge advocate general of the Air Force, providing legal advice to Air Force leaders, from February 2002 until stepping aside in September in the face of the investigation in what at the time was called a temporary move.

Fiscus did not face military criminal charges and his punishment came in a so-called Article 15 administrative procedure.

'WILL NOT BE TOLERATED'

"The Air Force takes any misconduct by its officer and enlisted airmen very seriously," an Air Force statement said. "The swift and strong actions of Air Force leadership make it clear that such misconduct will not be tolerated, regardless of the rank of the offender."

Fiscus was among the senior military lawyers who raised questions about U.S. policy toward military detainees, which has been under scrutiny since a series of prisoner abuse scandals erupted earlier this year. Continued ...

© Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: airforce; lawyer; military; tjag; unbecoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
I can't believe the Air Force general officer ranks have not yet realized that the bigger they are, the harder they should fall. Obstruction of justice virtually ALWAYS merits at least a special court martial, not to mention the other charges. And what does "generally" consensual mean? The actions are a black eye for my Corps, and the response is a black eye for the USAF. FYI, I've yet to speak with a single USAF JAG who thinks the response was appropriate. I'd love to be a defense counsel on the next Article 133 (conduct unbecoming) case that is sent to trial.
1 posted on 12/23/2004 7:05:20 AM PST by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

RHIP


2 posted on 12/23/2004 7:07:45 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
>I can't believe the Air Force general officer ranks have not yet realized that the bigger they are, the harder they should fall. ... And what does "generally" consensual mean?


3 posted on 12/23/2004 7:11:52 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

I work in AETC and the fraternization rules are clear and stringently enforced. The irony is that they came into being because former General officers were actually building stables of sweet young students to use as "gifts" to visiting dignitaries. because the high-powered political vermin couldn't handle the responsibility of being decent, we have to be very careful when around students.


4 posted on 12/23/2004 7:12:19 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

My experience has been that to true leaders, the higher rank they achieve, the less rank matters; i.e., the more humble and servant-hearted they become. Unfortunately, the process doesn't always catch the bad apples.


5 posted on 12/23/2004 7:14:07 AM PST by jagusafr (Say what you mean and mean what you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

Funny...there's another thread running right now about AF JAGs getting lighter case loads. Apparently they don't have enough free time....


6 posted on 12/23/2004 7:18:25 AM PST by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

Any relationship to the affects of that former Commander
in chief who dazzeled America by his brilliance and powerful statement "it all depends what the meaning of is- is" is purely co-incidental .Unles sone believes in the
residual affect especially when the chain of command is
weakest at it's head.


7 posted on 12/23/2004 7:22:14 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
; i.e., the more humble and servant-hearted they become. Unfortunately, the process doesn't always catch the bad apples.

Retired General Tony McPeak comes to mind: Humble? No. Arrogant? Yes.

8 posted on 12/23/2004 7:22:31 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

Aim High!


9 posted on 12/23/2004 7:22:41 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
30 years ago I was a young permanent duty Airman at a major ATC base. It was like having a fox in a henhouse. This General broke all the rules and is going to pay for it. There are way too many young babes at the ATC bases that will provide too much temptation to the weak.
10 posted on 12/23/2004 7:23:20 AM PST by vetvetdoug (In memory of T/Sgt. Secundino "Dean" Baldonado, Jarales, NM-KIA Bien Hoa AFB, RVN 1965)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

AMENAMENAMEN!!!Met the guy a couple of times - a truly arrogant individual.


11 posted on 12/23/2004 7:24:11 AM PST by jagusafr (Say what you mean and mean what you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

McPeak?...his wife wanted to see our chest hairs...


12 posted on 12/23/2004 7:27:21 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Well, at least she didn't want to make lamps out of your tattoos!


13 posted on 12/23/2004 7:28:22 AM PST by jagusafr (Say what you mean and mean what you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

He should get a Bad Conduct discharge as an example to every other member in the Air Force and receive no benefits whatsoever.


14 posted on 12/23/2004 7:29:13 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
He should get a Bad Conduct discharge

Kind of harsh for consensual affairs don't you think. I could see if harrassment was alleged but BCD for consensual affair?

15 posted on 12/23/2004 7:31:47 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

tattoos taboo now...


16 posted on 12/23/2004 7:32:04 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Officers can only get dismissals, not BCDs or DDs - but you're right. On the heels of the Academy problems, the senior AF attorney should have been keelhauled for his actions, and the GO deciding what forum to use should have ordered an Article 32 investigation. Instead, they've taken all the disciplinary bullets out of the JAG's gun when we do those military justice briefings to all the first-term airmen. Thanks a bunch, sir.


17 posted on 12/23/2004 7:39:11 AM PST by jagusafr (Say what you mean and mean what you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

The affairs concern me, but the obstruction of justice and the sheer volume are what merit charges. Besides, can an affair between an enlisted person and a two-star general every really be consensual?


18 posted on 12/23/2004 7:42:44 AM PST by jagusafr (Say what you mean and mean what you say!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StonyBurk

America has been dazzled countless times by dazzling brilliance, dazzlingly powerful statements, and dazzling charisma. John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and John Kerry come immediately to mind--but then there are such brilliant dazzlers as Barbra Streisand, Peter Jennings, Walter Chronkite... The list goes on and on but is too dazzling to pursue!


19 posted on 12/23/2004 7:56:59 AM PST by Savage Beast (This is the choice: confrontation or capitulation. Appeasement is capitulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

I actually breathed a sigh of relief when I realized that all of these consensual affairs were of the heterosexual variety. :-)

If a man that age can have a dozen relationships over such a short period of time then I say make him a poster boy. :-)


20 posted on 12/23/2004 8:22:46 AM PST by El Gran Salseron (My wife just won the "Inmate of the Month Award!" :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson