Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

College's Decision to Allow Men Irks Women
fox news ^

Posted on 12/08/2004 1:56:35 PM PST by golch1979

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: shellshocked

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

That's too funny. I hope you kept going after you got signed up. *grin* Really get their spandex in a twist!


21 posted on 12/08/2004 2:05:37 PM PST by exnavychick (Just my two cents, as usual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: golch1979
What is sad about this is that it was the school's need for money that is causing the change and not a sense of social fairness. They certainly do not need my money.

Muleteam1

22 posted on 12/08/2004 2:06:19 PM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golch1979
I get a kick out of this hypocricy.

What about the hypocrisy of those who defend single sex male colleges, but won't do the same for single sex female colleges?

23 posted on 12/08/2004 2:06:57 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golch1979
Equal protection for me but not for you is the mantra.

We've got this chain of excercise places out here called "Curves", and in the fine print underneath, it says, "for women". I always wondered what they'd do if a guy wanted to join. There are no showers, no disrobing, only the argument that, "Women wouldn't want to sweat to the oldies if men were watching." That argument didn't hold any water when racist store owners wanted to keep black people out of their establishments, would it be any more valid today?

24 posted on 12/08/2004 2:07:33 PM PST by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golch1979

Kick the women out of VMI and The Citadel ...


25 posted on 12/08/2004 2:07:37 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zahal724

There are some good-looking liberal girls around here, as there are some good-looking conservatives as well.


26 posted on 12/08/2004 2:07:52 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: zahal724

"student Starbuck Hersey."

Joke name I hope. Couldn't have been named after the coffee place, but possibly Starbuck on Battlestar Galactica?


27 posted on 12/08/2004 2:09:09 PM PST by G32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: golch1979

Sexist, Female Chauvinist Sows.


28 posted on 12/08/2004 2:09:14 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Apples and oranges. That is not the argument here. I'm not making the point that there are not valid reasons for all-male and all-female schools. I'm just pointing out that these girls at these schools are, in all probability, liberal. Logic tells me where they are on social issues today. When the boomerang is coming back at them, they react this way. Hypocrisy is beautiful, because it proves a lack of merit in someone else, it doesn't do anything to you.
29 posted on 12/08/2004 2:10:51 PM PST by golch1979 ("Captain Sobel, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
What about the hypocrisy of those who defend single sex male colleges, but won't do the same for single sex female colleges?

Ditto.

30 posted on 12/08/2004 2:12:18 PM PST by bigLusr (Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bigLusr
See comment 29. I'm not saying there isn't value in same-sex schools. But this is just cartoonish.
31 posted on 12/08/2004 2:13:48 PM PST by golch1979 ("Captain Sobel, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: golch1979
Apples and oranges. That is not the argument here. I'm not making the point that there are not valid reasons for all-male and all-female schools. I'm just pointing out that these girls at these schools are, in all probability, liberal.

I don't care what the political affliation of the girls is. They enrolled at Wells College under the assumption they would receive an education in a single-sex environment. It is a shame that it might not come to pass. They are right to sue.

32 posted on 12/08/2004 2:14:11 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bigLusr
I never understood why a girl would want to break into an all male college. Sounds like a house of horrors to me (knowing men the way I do).

Although a single man infiltrating an all girl college...this one I understand!

Gum

33 posted on 12/08/2004 2:14:37 PM PST by ChewedGum (aka King of Fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: G32
Joke name I hope. Couldn't have been named after the coffee place, but possibly Starbuck on Battlestar Galactica?

Probably Starbuck from Moby Dick (which is where the chain got it's name)

34 posted on 12/08/2004 2:14:54 PM PST by Modernman (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: golch1979

So you agree that they should fight to keep the school all-female. You agree that they're not doing anything wrong.

You simply disagree with views which they may or may not have held in regards to VMI.


35 posted on 12/08/2004 2:16:03 PM PST by bigLusr (Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
I don't care what the political affliation of the girls is. They enrolled at Wells College under the assumption they would receive an education in a single-sex environment. It is a shame that it might not come to pass. They are right to sue.

I don't know what damages they could show, especially if the college only allows freshmen males the first year, and then sophomores the next year and so on. The girls in the school already will probably have few or no male classmates, since those would have to be transfers, or they'd have to take a class with underclassmen.

36 posted on 12/08/2004 2:17:27 PM PST by Koblenz (Holland: a very tolerant country. Until someone shoots you on a public street in broad daylight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
Again you miss the point. If you read the article you'd see that any body already admitted would graduate before they let in boys. Also I'm not talking about their political affiliation just for the heck of it. Give you one guess what they would think of an all-male school doing this? Well, maybe they've changed their mind now. Ever heard "do as I say, not as I do." Ever heard that "this is OK because we can't be racist."
37 posted on 12/08/2004 2:17:28 PM PST by golch1979 ("Captain Sobel, we solute the rank, not the man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

It does sound like breach of at least implied contract...for the aggrieved women not to file suit would be a waiver and acceptance of the breach/revised contract. Sounds like the policy of the college changed for financial gain and now they've infuriated their main market to bring in a few more bucks. Bad strategic move. Betcha an adminstrative head or two rolls over this and the "new policy" is repealed. That's what SHOULD happen anyway.


38 posted on 12/08/2004 2:18:05 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (FREE people needn't apply to a Government of/by/for the People for a gun (PERSONAL PROPERTY) permit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: G32

Or Starbuck the character from a book that Starbuck's was named after...


39 posted on 12/08/2004 2:19:08 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('Hate' is just a special kind of Love we give to people who suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Meanwhile, much more attention should be given to single-sex Junior High/Senior High schools....it's not just for the elitists anymore....


40 posted on 12/08/2004 2:19:58 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (FREE people needn't apply to a Government of/by/for the People for a gun (PERSONAL PROPERTY) permit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson