'' Trial lawyers like vice presidential nominee John Edwards should instead be called "public protection attorneys,''Oh, yeah, that's the path back to permanent majority. LOL.
To: jalisco555
This clown honestly thinks that another dose of too-clever-by-half newspeak is going to bamboozle the public and turn things around?
I should think most of us are already wise to this well-worn modus operandi.
2 posted on
12/07/2004 12:53:03 AM PST by
sinanju
To: jalisco555
poison-free communitiesOkay, we'll start with cleaning supplies and medication that isn't child-safe. Then we'll remove all arsenic-treated wood and create a police patrol to go door-to-door looking for past-dated milk.
3 posted on
12/07/2004 12:53:52 AM PST by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: jalisco555
They still don't get it. Going to Cal-Berkely is like the chicken going to the fox and asking how to protect the chickens from the foxes. They're the hot bed of liberalism there at Berkely.
To: jalisco555
George Lakoff, which rhymes with jack-off as Rush pointed out today sounds like the perfect guy to give the rats a message that resonates with voters. Yet another Christmas gift for Republicans.
5 posted on
12/07/2004 2:46:56 AM PST by
Larry381
(Wanted: Country willing to import thousands of whining liberals-Will pay steerage charges)
To: jalisco555
"Democrats must develop a message that resonates more deeply with voters"
How about simply standing for something and then communicating it to voters. Dems don't get it - You can't "Develop a message" if you don't believe it or if your actions belie it.
6 posted on
12/07/2004 2:48:30 AM PST by
drt1
To: jalisco555
"a Berkeley scholar "
Oh yeah, thats just brilliant DUmmies. Take advise from a Berzerkly U. moonbat. Yep, that's just perfect. You all sure will reach the red state rubes,,,,er,,,,I mean citizens with that tactic.
What a bunch of dopes!
7 posted on
12/07/2004 2:50:21 AM PST by
kb2614
( You have everything to fear, including fear itself. - The new DNC slogan)
To: jalisco555
Democrats say is another plan to help the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. Has Lakoff heard the term, "Shopworn Horseplop"? Nobody falls for the old "Republicans are for the rich" BS anymore. That's because people can just look at the Democrats and see that they are the party of Manhattan socialites, trial lawyers, and Hollywood stars. Oh yeah, and windsurfing gigolos with five mansions who run for president because it's the next feather in their cap.
|
8 posted on
12/07/2004 3:03:30 AM PST by
Nick Danger
(Want some wood?)
To: jalisco555
ROFLMAO.
Yeah, PC vocabulary reframing on campus and in the media has brought them thousands of new supporters. That'll work wonders. /sarcasm
9 posted on
12/07/2004 3:07:46 AM PST by
LibertarianInExile
(NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
To: jalisco555
Lakoff says Republicans -- through their elaborate think tanks that train them to influence the media -- have learned how to speak to voters in simple terms. Since when has the media been on our side? The Republicans have learned to manipulate the media? We wish. The truth shines through nonetheless, but the Democrats are so blind that they can't see beyond their own insular fences.
To: jalisco555
They might as well go whole hog... Maybe in 2008 we'll see ads that say "Republicans doubleplusungood!"
13 posted on
12/07/2004 3:24:06 AM PST by
jejones
To: jalisco555
The 'Democrat Party' just doesn't get it.
It's the issues, stupid.
18 posted on
12/07/2004 4:09:26 AM PST by
MWS
To: jalisco555
'nother edjucated idiot.
they think they're superior to us.
19 posted on
12/07/2004 4:13:46 AM PST by
ken21
(against the democrat plantation.)
To: jalisco555
How can we fool 'em better next time? There's the idea - let's watch HOW we say it not WHAT we say. The poor dolts have no idea why they lost the last election. I mean they still think they didn't get their message out! By all means, let's encourage them to think prettier packaging will make a repulsive set of ideas more palatable to the voters.
20 posted on
12/07/2004 4:16:47 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: jalisco555
Trial lawyers ... should instead be called "public protection attorneys,'' and the term environmental protection, which brings to mind big government and reams of regulations, should instead be termed "poison-free communities.''I find them contradictory...
21 posted on
12/07/2004 4:24:59 AM PST by
paudio
(Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
To: jalisco555
He "protected" us to the tune of 40 million bucks in his pockets.
"Pocket protection attorneys"
24 posted on
12/07/2004 5:10:20 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: jalisco555
If WE picked somebody to reform the rat party we couldn't do better. These zipper heads actually believe that a guy from some liberal college knows how to speak Redstatian?
25 posted on
12/07/2004 5:13:32 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
( Frist/ Blackwell in 2008 for a landslide: you saw it here first.)
To: jalisco555
These liberals never cease to amaze me. Changing names for these Democratic talking points to make them less offensive is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. It is not going to solve the fundamental problem in that our opponents have no programs that will attract voters.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson