Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

'' Trial lawyers like vice presidential nominee John Edwards should instead be called "public protection attorneys,''

Oh, yeah, that's the path back to permanent majority. LOL.

1 posted on 12/07/2004 12:48:03 AM PST by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jalisco555

This clown honestly thinks that another dose of too-clever-by-half newspeak is going to bamboozle the public and turn things around?

I should think most of us are already wise to this well-worn modus operandi.


2 posted on 12/07/2004 12:53:03 AM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
poison-free communities

Okay, we'll start with cleaning supplies and medication that isn't child-safe. Then we'll remove all arsenic-treated wood and create a police patrol to go door-to-door looking for past-dated milk.

3 posted on 12/07/2004 12:53:52 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

They still don't get it. Going to Cal-Berkely is like the chicken going to the fox and asking how to protect the chickens from the foxes. They're the hot bed of liberalism there at Berkely.


4 posted on 12/07/2004 2:44:34 AM PST by MadAnthony1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

George Lakoff, which rhymes with jack-off as Rush pointed out today sounds like the perfect guy to give the rats a message that resonates with voters. Yet another Christmas gift for Republicans.


5 posted on 12/07/2004 2:46:56 AM PST by Larry381 (Wanted: Country willing to import thousands of whining liberals-Will pay steerage charges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
"Democrats must develop a message that resonates more deeply with voters"

How about simply standing for something and then communicating it to voters. Dems don't get it - You can't "Develop a message" if you don't believe it or if your actions belie it.
6 posted on 12/07/2004 2:48:30 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

"a Berkeley scholar "

Oh yeah, thats just brilliant DUmmies. Take advise from a Berzerkly U. moonbat. Yep, that's just perfect. You all sure will reach the red state rubes,,,,er,,,,I mean citizens with that tactic.

What a bunch of dopes!


7 posted on 12/07/2004 2:50:21 AM PST by kb2614 ( You have everything to fear, including fear itself. - The new DNC slogan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Democrats say is another plan to help the wealthy at the expense of the middle class.

Has Lakoff heard the term, "Shopworn Horseplop"? Nobody falls for the old "Republicans are for the rich" BS anymore. That's because people can just look at the Democrats and see that they are the party of Manhattan socialites, trial lawyers, and Hollywood stars. Oh yeah, and windsurfing gigolos with five mansions who run for president because it's the next feather in their cap.


8 posted on 12/07/2004 3:03:30 AM PST by Nick Danger (Want some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

ROFLMAO.

Yeah, PC vocabulary reframing on campus and in the media has brought them thousands of new supporters. That'll work wonders. /sarcasm


9 posted on 12/07/2004 3:07:46 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Lakoff says Republicans -- through their elaborate think tanks that train them to influence the media -- have learned how to speak to voters in simple terms.

Since when has the media been on our side? The Republicans have learned to manipulate the media? We wish. The truth shines through nonetheless, but the Democrats are so blind that they can't see beyond their own insular fences.

10 posted on 12/07/2004 3:13:48 AM PST by Republicanprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

They might as well go whole hog... Maybe in 2008 we'll see ads that say "Republicans doubleplusungood!"


13 posted on 12/07/2004 3:24:06 AM PST by jejones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

The 'Democrat Party' just doesn't get it.

It's the issues, stupid.


18 posted on 12/07/2004 4:09:26 AM PST by MWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

'nother edjucated idiot.

they think they're superior to us.


19 posted on 12/07/2004 4:13:46 AM PST by ken21 (against the democrat plantation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

How can we fool 'em better next time? There's the idea - let's watch HOW we say it not WHAT we say. The poor dolts have no idea why they lost the last election. I mean they still think they didn't get their message out! By all means, let's encourage them to think prettier packaging will make a repulsive set of ideas more palatable to the voters.


20 posted on 12/07/2004 4:16:47 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
Trial lawyers ... should instead be called "public protection attorneys,'' and the term environmental protection, which brings to mind big government and reams of regulations, should instead be termed "poison-free communities.''

I find them contradictory...

21 posted on 12/07/2004 4:24:59 AM PST by paudio (Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

He "protected" us to the tune of 40 million bucks in his pockets.

"Pocket protection attorneys"


24 posted on 12/07/2004 5:10:20 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555

If WE picked somebody to reform the rat party we couldn't do better. These zipper heads actually believe that a guy from some liberal college knows how to speak Redstatian?


25 posted on 12/07/2004 5:13:32 AM PST by jmaroneps37 ( Frist/ Blackwell in 2008 for a landslide: you saw it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jalisco555
These liberals never cease to amaze me. Changing names for these Democratic talking points to make them less offensive is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. It is not going to solve the fundamental problem in that our opponents have no programs that will attract voters.
29 posted on 12/07/2004 9:37:25 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson