Posted on 11/28/2004 10:40:49 AM PST by hsmomx3
Washington, DC The National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the U.S., today welcomed President Bushs nomination of White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales to succeed John Ashcroft as Attorney General. If confirmed, Gonzales would be the first Hispanic ever to serve as Attorney General.
We are very encouraged by the Gonzales nomination. We previously criticized the Bush Administration for not having an Hispanic in the cabinet since the departure of former HUD Secretary, now Senator-elect, Mel Martinez. We are pleased that one of the first acts since the Presidents reelection both rectifies that situation and marks an historic milestone for the Latino community. Never before has an Hispanic served as head of one of the four major cabinet posts Secretary of State, Treasury, Defense, and Attorney General, stated Janet Murguia, NCLR Executive Director and COO.
Murguia also noted Gonzales ties to the Hispanic community throughout his career. Alberto Gonzales served with distinction on the board of directors of one of NCLRs oldest and most respected affiliates, the Association for the Advancement of Mexican Americans (AAMA) in Houston, Texas. Moreover, during his tenure as White House Counsel, he has been one of the most accessible members of the White House staff to NCLR and other Hispanic organizations, added Murguia.
Murguia concluded, We acknowledge that this is the first step of a long confirmation process that requires that his record be fully examined. That being said, Gonzales is a thoughtful, reasonable public servant, a man of his word, and we have every expectation that his nomination will be very well received in the Latino community.
I thought you said that you were Cuban?
That makes you NOT white...in this country.
The difference between the lowest common denominator and the, ahem, highest denominator in this case is about the width of a human hair. One calls itself "The Race" but makes little attempt at distancing itself from other more radical Hispanic groups. The other radical groups like MECha make no bones about their plans of a new country to be carved out of America called Aztlan and you laugh it off as some silly college lark, not to be taken seriously. Then there is another radical outfit that has the same objectives as MECha but in your view is somehow the only radical one.
Apparently NCLR agrees with you because they don't seem to mind what MECha stands for either. All this and you pretend to believe that there is some huge difference in the philosophies of these seditious groups and that it is wrong to lump them all together. The contortions you go through to spin a fallacy is simply amazing.
She would not give me the information to report the incident because are prominent republican party donors. She didn't want to lose her other job. I'm not entirely convinced anything would have been done anyway. The issue goes unattended to by everyone here.
"So, what you're saying is that illegal aliens from Mexico crossing over here because they can get work here is a problem, but Mexico is not your problem"
Precisely. If they want a job in this country they can immigrate legally. I have no problem with that.
I guess you could say the USA should be like the "boy in a bubble" and try to keep the entire flu epideic out of this country. (using your logic, you wont have to worry about the runny nose and fever)
In your words, Luis- "I believe that doing something is better than doing nothing."
Your plan is to let the flu flourish in this country -
hen this stated goal should be easily visible on their website.
There used to be statements on Mecha's websites that ain't there now.TOO
But GWB claims to have campaigned on the issue.
Perhaps you'll point out his robust and candid discussion of immigration with the electorate.
That's not it at all.
What do you know about the worker to retireee ratios in the past 30 years?
Was illegal immigration ever a choice in any of these polls?
hey Torie....it's hard being a Southern Peckerwood....folks pick on us like we're Nazis or Afrikaaners....what's a poor good ol boy to do?
i'm not allowed to be "proud".
I have said it before and I shall say it again for the last time:
I believe in complete immigration amnesty for all of the beautiful women in the world from anyhwere regardless of race who wish to migrate here.
I think that is quite fair and they can be helpful to our gene pool. I'm not asking for handmaidens ...simply great looking gals who want to be non-hyphenated Americans and contribute to a better (looking) America.
Bonus quotas for Baltic State gals!!
I'm not talking Belluci beautiful....just pleasant.
Nobody better call me a racist....I think my modest proposal runneth over with goodwill and altruism.
So, in other words, you did nothing about ONE illegal alien that you could have done something about, but you expect SOMEONE to do SOMETHING about ten million illegal aliens that are not located or identified.
You lacked the gumption to do something about an issue that you apparently feel strongly about, but you expect the government to do something.
I give up Luis. You win. Have a nice evening.
If it is such an important issue, then why did it need to be mentioned to the public in order for them to mention it?
"What do you know about the worker to retireee ratios in the past 30 years?
What do you think about keeping a roof over your head, food on the table and clothes on your back making 5.15/hr?
Can you sustain a family making minimum wage?
Now, making that amount of money with a family qualifies you for welfare. sec 8 housing, food stamps, etc.
Your using El Presedente Fox's excuse now, Luis.
Please tell me your above question was a joke - Your smarter than that.
Are you reading my posts or something? That is "my" word for the day. :)
Bush has fostered a "robust" discussion on this issue, as you can see by just reading FR threads ... he just hasn't got it right yet vis a vis the noisome details. I love detail, but then I am a lawyer.
And Bush is going to foster a "robust" discussion on medicial policy, social security and tax policy, to mention three minor little issues as well, in his coming term. And while I might disagree with him on all three (I suspect I will, but then I am a RINO), God how I love the man. He wants to do something, and be bold, and the discussion will do this polity good.
Attempting to rewrite history Luis? Our southern border was at its strongest when we had little to do with Mexico and all its problems...like for about 200 years. Ever since we went down the road of Amnesties and NAFTA our southern border has been continuously weakened to the point where it is today--practically non-existent and Wide Open to an invasion. Do you want it even more wide open?
Be proud of being a Southern Peckerwood, set up a Southern Peckerwood Legal Defense Fund and Historical Society, and to hell with anyone who thinks your racist for doing so.
Be proud of your heritage...whatever it happens to be.
You just love the "beautiful people." You must be a Beatles fan. :)
Maybe you haven't noticed, but it's 200 years later...I'm not trying to rewrite history, but you're trying to do something impossible which is to relive it.
There wasn't even a Border Patrol then, and people crossed the border at will.
You want an open border?
Go back 200 years like you want to.
"f it is such an important issue, then why did it need to be mentioned to the public in order for them to mention it?"
I beginning to lose faith in you, Luis -
I merely stated that perhaps illegal immigration was not a choice when asked.
Why wouldnt the pollsters have asked the question?
Think, Luis -
If Kerry was against illegal aliens it would have been in your polls. But since both were for the illegal alien (as is the MSM), the question was moot -
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.