Posted on 11/28/2004 12:21:56 AM PST by JohnHuang2
This can happen occasionally when a local chapter gets yahoo'd by the state or national office, who are running a special agenda of their own. But dollars to donuts, the local chapter and local attorneys are deeply involved in this case, and Esseks might not even be able to function without them.
In any event, only a small percentage of "ACLU cases" are actually run from the national office. Even though Esseks' name may appear on the pleadings, he may not even be lead consul for this case, but just the noisiest person in their pack of jackals and the cheer leader to get the local office behind the national office.
In any event, their is still plenty of dirt to dig up the local attorneys, board members and judges that are involved (don't forget those teachers that are probably secretly feeding info back to the ACLU).
--Boot Hill
The ACLU should be considered an outlaw organization, with no protection of the law.
your strategy is sound...
I'm tired of the continual assault from the lowest societal denominator in existence: sexual deviants. I don't care how they define themselves anymore, the whole lot is in the same basket. Homosexuals, Pedophiles...whatever. They need psychiatric help, not public promotion.
I know they're demanding "more attention" in an attempt to normalize deviant behavior in violation of just about everyone's perspective, whether it's God's Law, Nature or even Gaea. You cannot deny and overcome years of design and testing, then despite the obvious evidence left in front of your own eyes and say, "That's not what they meant".
For that matter, years and years of empirical evidence now show that homosexual behavior is societal poison. Those who imbibe in repeated high risk behavior are are exposing society to something worse than their deviancy. Dependency on antibiotics to combat disease wrought from misuse and abuse of human anatomy have bread strains of killer bacteria resistant to modern treatments. The homosexual community has achieved yet another unintended consequence: they have deprived society of our first line of defense against killer viruses and bacteria by rendering staple antibiotics as useless to us.
They can't seem to accept the fact that their deviancy leads to a life expectancy of just 42 years, and seemingly those who know it feel they should share it. As new and exciting strains of staff infections and other common ailments emerge from the homosexual community and spread among the populace, one may hope that a few look and begin to realize what they are doing to society, but I suspect they will only cry out that we are NOT doing enough to protect them.
And more, their latest efforts have been directed at children and public schools. "Educate the children and teach them it's normal" is their objective. Yet in doing so they are attacking the very parents of these children, attempting to bypass the parental rights of those who know better. They are stepping between parent and child, initiating a response based upon primal instinct that will no doubt "surprise" the more foolish of their ilk.
Mostly, I'm tired of stepping around the issue of the culture war here, which is what this is. I don't accept this behavior as being normal. I don't accept that one idiot's remark on how "The Gay Agenda" is like "Rosa Parks stepping on that bus" (Bless her courageous heart, one lone woman fought for the God given rights of an entire race.) This recent statement nearly made me blow a gasket. I could never equate the fight for civil rights of a race to the behavioral choices of sexual deviants. It doesn't click for me, and I hope civil rights leaders are aware that their valiant message is being perverted into "something far worse" than they ever imagined.
At any rate, I'm done with this garbage. PC is dead in me. For the homosexuals I know, thank you for not assaulting me with your behavior. I could care less (don't want to know) about "behind the door" but will pray every day for your souls. For those who assault me with your perversions in public, mind you, I don't accept deviant behavior of heterosexuals outdoors, expect to be treated with equal disdain and disrespect.
When do members of the ACLU have to undergo "tolerance training"?
H-O-M-E-S-C-H-O-O-L or Private School.
Consider running for the board after you join and then watching for which board tasks are the least popular, and then volunteer for them. A good example is the local fund raiser, where you'll be given access to a complete list of every card-carrying member of the ACLU in your district (usually one or two counties). That can be invaluable information to have, Just image cross-referencing judges and teachers names against that list!
Just remember, that since some of the members, even board members, will be licensed PI's, you better make sure your own public image is clean, especially as to your past political activities (like party voter registration, or party block working, or posting "W" signs on your property, etc.). If it isn't clean, get a fellow local FReeper to work with you. You can do the research, set up a website (e.g., "Kentuckians for Decency and full Disclosure"), establish contacts with conservative reporters in local media, etc.
Good luck and don't forget to (eventually) publish your results (minus how you did it) on FreeRepublic.
--Boot Hill
I sometimes wonder how the ACLU would see it is every time anyone encountered an ACLU lawyer, that lawyer gets pummeled, all in the interest of tolerance, mind you.
Government schools=Child abuse.
This kind of crap is what transforms the natural disgust, which normal people feel towards homosexuals, into darker emotions, and in some cases, open hostility.
What's the use turning redder when we haven't been able to stop this sh*t?
"District figures show 105 of 730 middle school students opted out of the training video and 145 of 971 high school students did likewise."
Seems alot of kids actually watched the video. Do you think it changed their core values on the subject, or did they go home and discuss it with their parents? Don't fear the ACLU. Fear your own lack of involvement in your children's lives. A one hour video is not going to change the results of solid parenting.
If only the school would propose that and see what the ACLU has to say. That $3 video rental would save the taxpayers thousands when the ACLU can't get out of town fast enough.
thanks but no thanks -zero tolerance.
Since the early 60s we have been frogs in a pot of boiling water while liberals slowly turn up the heat. But they turned the heat up too fast with gay marriage, lost the election, and have been set back a decade or more.
BUMP
P.S. Welcome to FR! I noted you have not commented either way regarding the election results. Do you feel our overwhelming victory and mandate with subsequent legislation will contribute to curbing homosexual agenda issues such as this one?
Simply because an organization calls itself a "civil liberties" group does not mean it actually is for them. In this case it is against everything America stands for.
It uses the same techniques as the communists in Stalin's day. It is Orwellian. This organization needs to be disbanded, especially in time of war.
This is just the kind of tyranny by the queer minority that Rep. Tom Coburn from OK is talking about. The media skewered him for it, and they certainly do not cover this KY story on 60 Minutes, because the left prefers boiling the tradionalist frog a little at a time. The ACLU has seriously over-played its hand here, and parents in all the red states will be alarmed if this story is reported. Fox needs to do an hour-long show on this one.
Did anyone ever consider that perhaps *we" are the stupid ones by allowing ourselves to be duped?
Think about it and consider this.
Words are important.
This is not an and has never been an issue of tolerance, it is an issue of imposition.
Interesting really how the intentional misuse of a single word can have such an effect. But by using the word tolerance in situations such as this it is easy to lay the burden on us. We are not being asked to "tolerate" anything, we are being asked to "change" and "accept". It is a clever and cunning misuse of words, like the misuse of the word 'phobia' and the invention of the words "homophobia" or "homophobe" to imply that we are the one's with the problem because we suffer from an irrational fear of homosexuals and their deviant practices. Get it straight. I don't fear homosexuality, I find it disgusting in the same way I would find it disgusting for one to eat their own poop.
And so, by demanding that we give our tacit approval of deviant behaviour and their um... "unions" homosexuals are not asking for tolerance. What they want is society's imprimatur. The redefinition of the word marriage gives their behaviour and their "unions" a stamp of normality. What was abnormal now becomes normal.
Is this "tolerance" or rather "forced acceptance"? Which in itself should be an oxymoron when acceptance means that you have received something willingly.
Another clever and cunning tactic being used by homosexuals is their cry that they are being "discriminated" against, that this is a "rights" issue and that they only want the "right" to marry just like everyone else.
Well... guess what. Homosexuals can get married. Just like everyone else. Whoever said they cannot get married?
Think about it.
Zero tolerance... that policy requires that everyone knows what's being taught in their own local school. Then fighting it or opting out. In this case it sounds like most parents don't care or don't see the video as grave threat...
-it may be that most don't care -then again most might have not beem aware of the actual content. Regardless, it would appear that the aclu does not want to give parents the option or 'choice' in the matter...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.