Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greatest Danger Is Kyoto Protocol, Not Global Warming
Human Events Online ^ | 11/24/04 | Herman Cain and Dan Gainor

Posted on 11/25/2004 5:32:31 AM PST by Maurice1962

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 11/25/2004 5:32:32 AM PST by Maurice1962
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962

I just rented and tried to watch "Day After Tomorrow".

3 attempts, I just couldn't do it. I love corny disaster movies, but the whole premise (and the acting) was SO BAD, it wasn't even comical after awhile.

What's scarier still. is that there are those who actually believe this crap. Intelligent, powerful people whose hatred of capitalism allows them to be taken in by such tripe.


2 posted on 11/25/2004 5:46:27 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962

I have taken an environmental science class in college (it was a requirement). What a joke! It's just a one-sided lecture.


3 posted on 11/25/2004 5:47:27 AM PST by senorita (A real American native)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Get this, the professor of the environmental science class actually encouraged us to watch that movie! He said it was very close to what is going to happen in the next few years. (Sort of a real life Chicken Little)


4 posted on 11/25/2004 5:50:14 AM PST by senorita (A real American native)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962

This treaty has nothing to do with global warming. This is nothing but another way to bring down the U.S. by the Marxists by the U.N.


5 posted on 11/25/2004 5:58:17 AM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senorita

You know what if global warming was somewhat a reality...what happenes? People would use less petro chemicals, coal, and wood to HEAT THEM SELVES.

Less energy would be used in cooking or manufacturing because the ambient temperature is already higher, there for less energy is needed to raise temperature. Air conditioning might be more of a factor in certain regions, but this would be counter balanced by less energy used in more northern climes due to reduced needs for heating.

All this leads to a new eqilibrium being reached between green house gases being produced and absorbed! The upward spike in temps would soon flatten out!

(at least if I understand the logic of the greenie scientists....I'm not really a believer of the above...just exploring their logic!)


6 posted on 11/25/2004 6:00:51 AM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962
No matter who the news shows interviewed, the coverage focused on the impact of global warming. The stories blamed everything from floods to drought on climate change. ABC blamed warming for "erratic" weather such as a Christmas Eve snowstorm in Buffalo of all places. Reporter Neal Karlinsky explained, "Scientists say there is a pattern here. The weather is becoming more erratic for one main reason, the earth is getting warmer."

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

WE'RE ALL DOOMED!

7 posted on 11/25/2004 6:21:43 AM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: WideGlide

The History of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere should help the debate but you never hear anything about it.

In the early earth, greenhouse gases, CO2 and methane, made up 80% of the atmosphere.

By the time of the dinosaurs, C02 had fallen to 3% and methane was absorbed into the earth. Oxygen had risen from 0 to about 15% concentration.

At the peak of the last ice age, C02 had fallen to just 0.15% whereas today it about 0.38% (which itself is up from 0.26% about 50 years ago.)

So a measely 0.12 percentage point rise is what we are talking about which might become another 0.12 points in another 50 years. CO2 is just 3 parts per thousand in the atmosphere.

During the time of the dinosaurs it was 10 times higher than it every will be with humans adding CO2 to atmosphere.

Did the dinosaurs die from the additional heat. Nah, it was just comfortably warmer than it is today. Something like the African savanna that we evolved on. What is the problem?


9 posted on 11/25/2004 6:32:58 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: digger48
I just rented and tried to watch "Day After Tomorrow".

I saw it on the big screen this past summer, and found it really cool to watch -- notwithstanding that the plot and characters were all stupid. I thought it was a hoot.

10 posted on 11/25/2004 6:40:09 AM PST by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962

Global warming should be welcomed with open arms, not turned into a money making scheme for the UN. They (the UN) can turn poppycock into dollars, but I don't think this one is going to pass scientific muster, and just might be the straw that kicks the UN to Paris, where they can enjoy each others company. After we clean up Iraq, we need to clean up the festering sore the boil of the UN has become. Maybe we could multi-task, and get them both done together.


11 posted on 11/25/2004 6:46:55 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: senorita
Get this, the professor of the environmental science class actually encouraged us to watch that movie! He said it was very close to what is going to happen in the next few years. (Sort of a real life Chicken Little)

I loved the realism of the Low PRessure Systems OF Unusual Size that was sucking cold air out of the stratosphere. Never mind the fact that low pressure systems are the result of air rising. But they had that cool graphic, so I guess they just had to run with it. That professor should be fired for ignorance.

12 posted on 11/25/2004 6:53:35 AM PST by Big Giant Head (How do you like my new tagline? It's fresh! Made with Lard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maurice1962
The weather is becoming more erratic for one main reason, the earth is getting warmer.

Of course, we all remember our great- and great-great-grandparent's stories about how stable the weather was in the pre-industrial age. About how, for instance, it ALWAYS snowed in Donner's Pass on December 24th, and the snowstorm would last for exactly 2 hours and 47 minutes. About how, on July 4th, they could ALWAYS count on a sunny 82F for their picnics.

Too bad we don't have that kind of predictable weather anymore.

< /sarcasm off >

13 posted on 11/25/2004 6:54:12 AM PST by exDemMom (Victory! Victory! Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Of course. Also, it always snowed on Christmas Eve when the carolers showed up. It was a wonderful life.


14 posted on 11/25/2004 6:57:47 AM PST by Big Giant Head (How do you like my new tagline? It's fresh! Made with Lard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wita

You just made my Thanksgiving by being there with clear fresh loyal American thought and and service to our country. Bless you and yours on this day of gratitude.


15 posted on 11/25/2004 6:59:43 AM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TAMU_Neocon

I haven't and won't see that movie, but I so desperately wish Hollywood would consult with actual scientists when they're making movies.

I'd do it, for $100K per film. That's a lot less than their overpaid actors--they can afford it. (Now, who do I market myself to?)


16 posted on 11/25/2004 7:04:59 AM PST by exDemMom (Victory! Victory! Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
exDemMom, you really should see it. It's a hoot! It's so far removed from reality, I was cracking jokes throughout the whole thing like it was a Mystery Science Theater 3000 episode. In fact, it would make such an excellent movie for that show to spoof, MST3K could make a comeback.

BTW, if leftists Hollywood were to employ real scientists in the making of their propaganda documentaries, they couldn't finish them. The only reason for all the Michael Moores of the world to make movies is to advance their wacky agenda without any rebuttal. Their arguments would fall apart with real science involved.

17 posted on 11/25/2004 7:12:40 AM PST by Big Giant Head (How do you like my new tagline? It's fresh! Made with Lard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

I just want one answer before I support any claims to global warming as being human caused.

Why is Mars warming too?

:)


18 posted on 11/25/2004 7:18:47 AM PST by Newshues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


19 posted on 11/25/2004 8:41:38 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

Thanks, never redundant. After all we give thanks everyday, not just on Thanksgiving, but today a special thanks to those in harms way who are protecting what we give thanks for in our relatively safe environment.


20 posted on 11/25/2004 10:01:58 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson