Skip to comments.
Say NO To Arnold For Prez (NO FOREIGN-Born Presidents)
Petition Online ^
| 11/23/2004
| Jon Alvarez
Posted on 11/23/2004 11:32:59 AM PST by Jon Alvarez
Like him or not, as Americans we should all stand together to say NO to any change in the US Constitution that would allow foreign-born, naturalized citizens to run for and hold the highest office in this great land...Apparently a movement is underway to change the US Constitution. We must stand up to this and oppose it.
Please sign the No2Arnold Petition
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: amendment; arnold; arnoldforpresident; article2; california; clinton; constitution; constitutionalism; constitutionalists; election; foreignborn; foreigner; hillary; homosexualagenda; legal; liberals; maria; monica; monicaonbill; president; question; republicans; rino; schwartzenrino; schwarzenegger; succession; tereza; vicepresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
To: fredhead
No guys, it was Germany. Adlof Hitler was born in Brannau, Austria in 1885. He was not a natrual-born German, as much as he claimed he was. Ummm, I'm not sure you got that either of us was being silly (unlike Prime Choice - take a look at post #42). However, the last country with an ehtnic Austrian as its leader, was, in fact, Austria: Heinz Fischer who was born in Graz.
61
posted on
11/23/2004 11:58:47 AM PST
by
drungus
To: Prime Choice
"Last I saw, the U.S. is the only country that people are demanding to permit foreigners to rule. Curiously enough, the U.S. is also the world's only remaining Superpower. "
Foreigners? How do naturalized U.S. citizens qualify as foreigners?
To: Jon Alvarez
NO FOREIGN-Born Presidents ~ Bump!
63
posted on
11/23/2004 12:01:50 PM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: alessandrofiaschi
Actually, according to the constitution, he couldn't even be Vice President, because of the succession thing.
64
posted on
11/23/2004 12:03:03 PM PST
by
Vor Lady
To: Moral Hazard
How do naturalized U.S. citizens qualify as foreigners? They are still considered citizens by the nation of their birth.
Look, you can dip a dustbunny in chocolate and call it a Bon-Bon, but it's still a dustbunny. By the same token, someone who spent 30 years in one nation and then emigrated to the U.S. and lived just 20 years here is still a citizen of the other nation first and foremost, no matter how much apologia you coat it with.
65
posted on
11/23/2004 12:03:27 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
To: StopDemocratsDotCom
I'm Hispanic, too...
I like Arnold. Your assumption is...wrong, as most assumptions are. I do, however, feel strongly about protecting our great country. Let Arnold's CHILDREN run for Prez.
To: ken5050
If there is one thing this election proved is that the majority sees through double talk and innuendos that are designed to deceive US. I don't think that strategy even if employed, would do much good.
67
posted on
11/23/2004 12:09:13 PM PST
by
vivabushchick
("Picture a smiley face on the Red States")
To: Prime Choice
"Look, you can dip a dustbunny in chocolate and call it a Bon-Bon, but it's still a dustbunny. By the same token, someone who spent 30 years in one nation and then emigrated to the U.S. and lived just 20 years here is still a citizen of the other nation first and foremost, no matter how much apologia you coat it with."
A person can be elected president of the U.S. if they were born in the U.S. and reached the age of 35. Why should someone who has lived in the U.S. for only 35 years have more right to run for president than someone who was born in another country, moved to the U.S. at age 20, lived here for 40 years and ran for president at age 60?
To: Grannyx4
No, he could be Vice President, just like Clinton. The only important thing is that he couldn't be the President elected . This is the mainstream opinion among the constitutionalists.
To: Moral Hazard
That's just the way the Founding Fathers made it...and I happen to think they were wise for it. Those who have no attachments or loyalties to other nations are best suited to serve in the highest office of this nation. Those who are born elsewhere will naturally have divided loyalties. That cannot stand.
Don't be so eager to sell our country out for the sake of political correctness. In case you haven't noticed, no other nation on Earth allows foreign-borns to rule their land. Why should the U.S. be any exception?
70
posted on
11/23/2004 12:14:10 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
To: Jon Alvarez
I'm not sure the founders were being all that lofty. I believe this clause was added in order to keep Alexander Hamilton from becoming president.
71
posted on
11/23/2004 12:23:57 PM PST
by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
To: vivabushchick
NO ACCEPTIONS!NO EXCEPTIONS, EITHER!
72
posted on
11/23/2004 12:25:57 PM PST
by
Chieftain
(Thank you Swift Boat Veterans/POWs/Vietnam Veterans for Truth - you did it for ALL your brothers!)
To: vivabushchick
You may well be correct. I was surprised at how high a % of Americans oppose the idea. My point was that this would be the ONLY possible strategy to sell it..
73
posted on
11/23/2004 12:27:48 PM PST
by
ken5050
To: Prime Choice
"In case you haven't noticed, no other nation on Earth allows foreign-borns to rule their land. "
What is your source for this information?
To: Jon Alvarez
It does not take a person with a degree in political science to understand that every major power on the planet would begin developing and supporting "their" candidate for office. With the power of raw cash we could easily end up with a President who was loyal, not to the US, but to the foreign country that got him elected.
Bad idea. Arnie is no founding father.
75
posted on
11/23/2004 12:39:31 PM PST
by
Pylot
To: Jon Alvarez
So Ah-Nold can't be President, but a child born to illegal aliens can be? Hmmmm.
76
posted on
11/23/2004 12:42:24 PM PST
by
You Dirty Rats
(31 Red States - All Your Senate Are Belong To Us!!)
To: Jon Alvarez
Nothing against Arnie but he is looking after his own best interest and not for the country. Can't he see how bad it would be to amend the consititution for him.
To: Moral Hazard
What is your source for this information? The sheer and utter lack of response I get after I challenge anyone to provide a list of nations that allow foreign-borns to run for their highest office.
78
posted on
11/23/2004 12:42:39 PM PST
by
Prime Choice
(I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
To: Jon Alvarez
Why waste time on this? It's going nowhere.
79
posted on
11/23/2004 12:44:55 PM PST
by
Nick Danger
(Want some wood?)
To: Jon Alvarez
/Sign
I don't like the idea of the constitutional change either.
Also, Arnold was a non starter for me after he said "The children have first dibs on the Treasury" when he was running for CA Governor. That's dangerous thinking in my opinion.
80
posted on
11/23/2004 12:45:40 PM PST
by
KoRn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson