Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico, U.S. reach accord on migrants' Social Security
El Universal Online ^ | November 23, 2004 | Wire services

Posted on 11/23/2004 11:03:48 AM PST by Regulator

QUITO, Ecuador Mexico and Washington agreed to introduce similar legislative initiatives whereby Mexican workers who paid into Social Security in the United States will be refunded their contributions when they return to their homeland, President Vicente Fox said here Monday.

"The initiatives entail the recognition of all those (Mexicans) who have worked in the United States legally or otherwise, so they will have the right to the savings they accumulated while working in the neighboring country," said Fox, who is visiting Ecuador.

During a news conference with Mexican journalists accompanying him on his travels, Fox announced that he and U.S. President George W. Bush agreed to simultaneously introduce in their respective Congresses what he dubbed the "Pay in Full" program initiatives.

Fox and Bush met in Santiago during the weekend summit of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.

During their meeting, Fox said, the two leaders made "very valuable" advances in talks on a guest worker program for Mexicans in the United States.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico
KEYWORDS: abjectripoff; aliens; illegalimmigration; immigration; mexico; socialsecurity; ss; totalization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last
To: Regulator; gubamyster; NewRomeTacitus; brianl703; JesseHousman; janetgreen; Joe Hadenuf; ...

I wanted to give you some information on the Totalization Agreement with Mexico. There was house action against this, it appears it only got 29 sponsers and I assume it is a dead bill, this being the end of the year(?).

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico. (Introduced in House)

HRES 720 IH

108th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 720

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


July 15, 2004

Mr. COLLINS (for himself, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr. GOODE, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. ROYCE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means




RESOLUTION

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico.


Resolved, That, pursuant to section 233(e)(2) of the Social Security Act, the House of Representatives hereby disapproves the agreement establishing totalization arrangements between the social security system established by title II of such Act and the social security system of Mexico, signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General, Mexican Social Security Institute, on June 29, 2004.

The 29 sponsers are:
COSPONSORS(29), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]:     (Sort: by date)

Rep Barrett, J. Gresham [SC-3] - 7/22/2004 Rep Bradley, Jeb [NH-1] - 10/6/2004
Rep Culberson, John Abney [TX-7] - 7/22/2004 Rep Davis, Jo Ann [VA-1] - 7/15/2004
Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] - 7/22/2004 Rep Doolittle, John T. [CA-4] - 7/15/2004
Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 7/15/2004 Rep English, Phil [PA-3] - 7/15/2004
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 7/15/2004 Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 7/22/2004
Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [VA-5] - 7/15/2004 Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6] - 11/17/2004
Rep Hayworth, J. D. [AZ-5] - 7/15/2004 Rep Hostettler, John N. [IN-8] - 7/15/2004
Rep Johnson, Sam [TX-3] - 7/15/2004 Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 7/15/2004
Rep King, Steve [IA-5] - 7/15/2004 Rep Manzullo, Donald A. [IL-16] - 9/15/2004
Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 9/15/2004 Rep Miller, Gary G. [CA-42] - 10/6/2004
Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 7/15/2004 Rep Norwood, Charlie [GA-9] - 7/15/2004
Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] - 7/22/2004 Rep Royce, Edward R. [CA-40] - 7/15/2004
Rep Sessions, Pete [TX-32] - 9/15/2004 Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21] - 7/15/2004
Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1] - 7/15/2004 Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] - 7/15/2004
Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1] - 7/22/2004

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:1:./temp/~c1084uPlbV::


121 posted on 11/26/2004 5:03:10 PM PST by AuntB (A people only understand the concept of democracy if they've fought and died for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator; gubamyster; NewRomeTacitus; brianl703; JesseHousman

We need to contact our Congressmen/women re: passage H.R. 489, the Social Security Act of 2003.

It is currently pending before the House W&M Subcommittee on Social Security.

They need to know Americans PREFER THIS instead of the SSI sellout!!!!


122 posted on 11/26/2004 5:09:06 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Regulator; gubamyster; NewRomeTacitus; brianl703; JesseHousman
OOPS!

That's H.R. 489, the Social Security for Americans Only Act of 2003

123 posted on 11/26/2004 5:12:11 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Interesting approach:

We have to pay ALL of the ongoing costs of providing public services to illegals, but they don't have to pay ANY of the ongoing costs of providing pensions to our elderly.

Yep, that's sure fair, alright.


124 posted on 11/26/2004 5:17:52 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (Is a /sarcasm tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

Thanks! Do you have the sponsers?


125 posted on 11/26/2004 5:21:56 PM PST by AuntB (A people only understand the concept of democracy if they've fought and died for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
We have to pay ALL of the ongoing costs of providing public services to illegals, but they don't have to pay ANY of the ongoing costs of providing pensions to our elderly

A really good point. Hadn't got that angle!

It's truly amazing to see the inversion of the political landscape in this country away from citizens and towards illegals. It's a bit surreal, and I never would have predicted it.

126 posted on 11/26/2004 5:35:45 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

That's a great list of co-sponsors (they should call it the "Patriot's Caucus"). I can only hope that the Res will do some good, although I would have hoped for 290 sponsors, not just 29.


127 posted on 11/26/2004 5:37:41 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I'm afraid I don't.
My Congressman, Mike McIntyre, took the time to write me a lengthy letter in response to my contacting his office re: illegal immigration and Social Security.
I must admit, he's fairly level headed when addressing those problems and has given House Resolution numbers I can publish that the public needs to know about.

One, in particular, is H.R.687, the Identification Integrity Act of 2003, which would make it unlawful to use any foreign form of ID EXCEPT a PASSPORT. Congressman McIntyre co-sponsors that resolution.

That, in itself, would deny ID's ie. matricular cards, to be used by illegal aliens to obtain taxpayer funded services.


128 posted on 11/26/2004 5:40:46 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: AgThorn

I was going to say the same thing. If I decide to move out of the country upon retirement, can I get a lump sum check too?


129 posted on 11/26/2004 5:57:29 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Here they are (19)

H.R.489
Title: To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide prospectively that wages earned, and self-employment income derived, by individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title, and to provide the President with authority to enter into agreements with other nations taking into account such limitation on crediting of wages and self-employment income.
Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 1/29/2003) Cosponsors (19)
Latest Major Action: 2/4/2003 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.



COSPONSORS(19), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Ballenger, Cass [NC-10] - 2/25/2003 Rep Bartlett, Roscoe G. [MD-6] - 4/29/2003
Rep Brown-Waite, Ginny [FL-5] - 5/7/2003 Rep Burgess, Michael C. [TX-26] - 4/2/2003
Rep Deal, Nathan [GA-10] - 3/20/2003 Rep Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 2/27/2003
Rep Everett, Terry [AL-2] - 3/13/2003 Rep Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 11/21/2003
Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [VA-5] - 2/27/2003 Rep Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 11/12/2003
Rep Kingston, Jack [GA-1] - 3/5/2003 Rep McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11] - 3/22/2004
Rep Mica, John L. [FL-7] - 9/4/2003 Rep Miller, Jeff [FL-1] - 3/22/2004
Rep Musgrave, Marilyn N. [CO-4] - 3/5/2003 Rep Sullivan, John [OK-1] - 6/5/2003
Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] - 3/13/2003 Rep Taylor, Charles H. [NC-11] - 3/20/2003
Rep Wamp, Zach [TN-3] - 3/5/2003


130 posted on 11/26/2004 5:58:45 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

By re-electing our El Presidente, we have slowed our sinking into third world status by a year or so.


131 posted on 11/27/2004 5:09:57 AM PST by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
It's hard to say. Kerry would have met massive resistance in the Congress. Bush is meeting focused resistance. Kerry probably would have ordered the Border Patrol to stand down, something he could do as CIC, and then signed an EO mandating "emergency relief" to all "undocumented workers".

So it's hard to say. You're probably right, Bush will simply drive slower on the road to Hell, since his friends in the Congress will keep trying to jam on the brakes.

132 posted on 11/27/2004 7:26:54 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

"Mike McIntyre, took the time to write me a lengthy letter"

Well, I'm hesitate to mention it, but the tip I got on the bill I posted was from Sen. Diane Fienstien and she supports it. Go figure.


133 posted on 11/27/2004 8:30:13 AM PST by AuntB (A people only understand the concept of democracy if they've fought and died for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
H. RES. 720

Thanks for the ping.

The House Committee on Ways and Means: Fact Sheet Mexican Totalization Agreement describes this as an unconsitutional legislative veto.

You can have no doubts that this Resolution's authors already know this. As such, it is an empty gesture, or political posturing.

It was designed to give the authors something that they can hold up at re-election time to show their constituents that they tried to stop the totalization agreement, but that evil ol' Supreme Court ruling prevented them from realizing their goal of stopping the Totalization Agreement from going into effect.

There is only one man who can stop this --George W. Bush.

Since it was his appointee who put it into place, I seriously doubt he'll yank it over our objections to paying US Social Security to Mexican illegal aliens.

He has bigger fish to fry.

134 posted on 11/29/2004 10:05:29 AM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson