Skip to comments.
**U.S.S. PUEBLO (NOW IN NORTH KOREA) SHOWN ON N. KOREAN TV YESTERDAY (Video Stream Here)**
NORTH KOREAN TV (November 20, 2004) Video Stream ^
| 20 November 2004
| AmericanInTokyo
Posted on 11/21/2004 8:51:04 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo
Here (by URL listed below and by direct link, above) is the North Korean TV news in prime time for November 20, 2004 (local time). It contains an interesting, short report of a minor African delegation paying a visit that day to the seized U.S.S. Pueblo , captured by Communist North Korea in 1968 and now relocated by the enemy to a tourist spot on the Taedong River in the capital city of Pyongyang.
Foreigners in North Korea are often taken to this American ship to see the damage to the craft from the attack, the interior of the ship, special communications rooms, the signed "confessions" of U.S. crew, etc., and of course to receive a hefty dose of DPRK propaganda.
Cut, paste and play in Microsoft Windows Media.
NOTE: FAST FORWARD AFTER FULL LOADING, TO THE 17:35 MINUTE MARK. YOU CAN SEE IT UNTIL THE 18:35 MARK.
The communist North Korean TV video report showing the USS Pueblo yesterday, lasts one minute:
http://www.pyonkoma.com/houdou8.asf
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: broadcast; bucher; dprk; enemy; kimjongil; northkorea; pueblo; pyongyang; tv; usnavy; usspueblo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Cvengr
Amazing to see a regieme waste so much money on keeping the old tub afloat when within the last decade they twice nearly met their demise from starvation,...and only saved by US charity.
It's not an old tub. Its still a commissioned United States Navy vessel. It is the property of the American people, its partially your property.
The foreigners who visited it while it remains illegally held should be barred from entering the United States ever.
21
posted on
11/21/2004 9:32:16 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: KMC1
Site Meter Why is this a big deal?
Because that is a commissioned U.S. Navy vessel that is still active. It belongs to us. Anyone who visits it while it remaines illegally held should be barred from visiting the US ever.
22
posted on
11/21/2004 9:34:07 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
Sorry to disagree, but when we're at sea chipping paint, including periods when the damned ship had just been thoroughly overhauled and retrofitted, it becomes thoroughly embedded upon one's soul that ships always require maintenance to stay afloat.
23
posted on
11/21/2004 9:35:59 PM PST
by
Cvengr
(;^))
To: RebelTex
The asshole who sent the U.S.S. Pueblo to North Korea with inadequate armament worked across the desk from my father at the Pentagon. My father urged him to fix the problem before the ship was deployed. In the end, the asshole who made the bad decision made Captain.
24
posted on
11/21/2004 10:02:54 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: AmericanInTokyo
To: AmericanInTokyo
Why isn't this a target for a cruise missile?
26
posted on
11/21/2004 10:05:58 PM PST
by
Tax Government
(Boycott and defeat the Legacy Media. Become a monthly contributor to FR.)
To: Cvengr
Sorry to disagree, but when we're at sea chipping paint, including periods when the damned ship had just been thoroughly overhauled and retrofitted, it becomes thoroughly embedded upon one's soul that ships always require maintenance to stay afloat.
She is still an active commissioned US warship regardless of her physical condition. As such, she is ours. We should have fought to retrieve her when she was illegally seized. We should have retaken her when she was moved through international waters in recent years. Allowing a US warship to remain in the hands of pirates was and is a dishonor.
I look forward to the day when this "tub" reenters a US port with her ensign flying. I hope she outlasts the pirate regime that holds her captive.
USS Pueblo
27
posted on
11/21/2004 10:32:21 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Tax Government
Why isn't this a target for a cruise missile?
She's still an active US Navy vessel. She'll be returned to her home port someday with her ensign flying when the regime who pirated her goes down or she'll go down at the hands of the enemy.
28
posted on
11/21/2004 10:34:23 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
I picture a day when it will be broght back home.
29
posted on
11/21/2004 10:49:14 PM PST
by
oyez
(¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
To: Calpernia; Alabama MOM; Velveeta; Revel; callmejoe; appalachian_dweller; lacylu; jerseygirl; ...
A must read thread, I learned several things.
30
posted on
11/21/2004 10:56:15 PM PST
by
nw_arizona_granny
(Today, please pray for God's miracle, we are not going to make it without him.)
To: nw_arizona_granny
"A must read thread, I learned several things."
At the time this happened I was on active duty. My first impression was that the ship would be returned by force if necessary, shortly after it's seizure. As weeks wore on it became apparent that nothing would be done.
31
posted on
11/21/2004 11:07:25 PM PST
by
Inge_CAV
To: Inge_CAV
At the time this happened I was on active duty. My first impression was that the ship would be returned by force if necessary, shortly after it's seizure. As weeks wore on it became apparent that nothing would be done.
Indeed. But a few years ago she was transported through international waters, through the Sea of Japan, around South Korea, from Wonson to Pyongyang. When she reentered international waters we should have liberated her. Rumor was that she was wired with explosives and there was also a rumor that they put children on board. Perhaps I am harsh, but she should have been intercepted and the attempt made to retake her at that point.
32
posted on
11/21/2004 11:14:00 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: Myrddin
" In the end, the asshole who made the bad decision made Captain. Unfortunately, there will always be some who can work the system. It's too bad that your father's advice wasn't heeded.
From my earlier post:
With no current information available on hostile activities by North Korean forces, the officer in charge at US CINCPACFLT assigned the mission a risk assessment of minimal. All attempts by PUEBLO's commanding officer to upgrade this assessment to hazardous were rebuffed.
and this:
The tasking for similar USS BANNER missions had been rated as hazardous, and fighter aircraft had been made available on a strip alert status and 2 US Navy destroyers had maintained station within 50 miles of BANNER.
Since no protection at all was provided for her, it's almost as if someone wanted the Pueblo to be captured or sunk. But, why? The real answers may be in hidden classified documents that might exist. It would be good to know the complete story. It is an embarrassment that NK still has possession of her.
33
posted on
11/21/2004 11:17:15 PM PST
by
RebelTex
(Freedom is Everyone's Right... ...and Everyone's Responsibility!)
To: Arkinsaw
I believe LBJ was president when it was captured and I am guessing that it was Clinton in office when it was moved. If Nixon had been president when it was captured, I do not think he would have allowed them to get away with it.
34
posted on
11/21/2004 11:20:36 PM PST
by
Inge_CAV
To: RebelTex
My father probably knew the whole story. Unfortunately, he died Dec 17, 2003. I can't ask him. I know the name of the individual who made the bad decision. It's probably not wise to expose that information.
35
posted on
11/21/2004 11:52:33 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: F15Eagle
Naw, it's a stirring rendition of "The Great Leader Kims Divine Spirit is Guiding The World To Perfection". The "new country" version.
36
posted on
11/22/2004 3:50:00 AM PST
by
SirLurkedalot
(Kevin Sites is an a**hole.)
To: nw_arizona_granny; AmericanInTokyo
37
posted on
11/22/2004 5:33:34 AM PST
by
Velveeta
To: BIGLOOK
URL link to the North Korean video on this story still works (as of 0900 Eastern US time, Monday). it might be your specific equipment or perhaps you don't have Windows Media format, or some other explanation?
38
posted on
11/22/2004 5:59:16 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I'll take 1 good "LET'S ROLL!" over 1,000 meaningless & vulgar "ALLAH AHKBAR"'s, any day!)
To: Myrddin
"It's probably not wise to expose that information."Without knowing more of the story, I agree. You might be able to get more information by communicating with the vets who set up the Pueblo website. They are trying to piece together as much of what happened as they can discover. You may have some info that they can use. I'm sure they would be grateful for your input. Here's a link to their website:
USS PUEBLO (AGER-2)
39
posted on
11/22/2004 11:41:55 AM PST
by
RebelTex
(Freedom is Everyone's Right... ...and Everyone's Responsibility!)
To: RebelTex
I've passed the name to the contact listed on their web page. The vets will have to do the legwork. I'm only privvy to the information because it was discussed over dinner as the Pueblo events unfolded. I have an iron clad memory of my father's dismay.
40
posted on
11/22/2004 1:14:53 PM PST
by
Myrddin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson