Posted on 11/17/2004 10:31:15 PM PST by jakerobins
KERRY FIT TO SUE 'UNFIT' AUTHOR
November 18, 2004 -- LIBERAL loser John Kerry might be planning to strike back at John O'Neill, the "Unfit for Command" author who claims some of the credit for Kerry's defeat, sources say.
In the book, published by Regnery not long before the election, O'Neill — who, like Kerry, commanded swift boats in Vietnam — attacked Kerry's war record and branded him a traitor.
O'Neill sold over 800,000 copies and his group, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, raised $25 million to battle the Kerry campaign and ran TV ads trashing the candidate. Former Sen. Bob Dole endorsed the group.
O'Neill says he wrote the book because Kerry called his fellow Vietnam vets monsters, terrorists and war criminals, for which he has never apologized.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Go right a head an sue
I can't wait to hear what comes out in the DISCOVERY
Hey Kerry .. are you prepared to hand over ALL the documents???
Not only dead-on and well said--but this can be generalized to all the weepy Leftists out there who hate Bush....they know they'll never be people of honor and seek to drag him down to their level...awful hollowness, projection, hatred, self-loathing....what a bunch of Woody Allens! Yet God gave us all brains and free wills....some of us--who may be disinclined to believe in evolution...survive as the fittest minds and wills--and rise above the fray to succeed!
Nice fake-out though Johnny boy.
Oh, this little fakeout is just another piece of evidence that LIBERALS LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING, ALL THE TIME.
Yeah, the yappers are usually hiding their fear. I'd LOVE to see Kerry do this...would LOVE it!
But you're right...he doesn't have the stones to go through with it.
I would be willing to bet kerry never had a fist fight in his entire life. (L) kerri one MoFo candy-assed loser.
I've read he's literally a 'crack' shot at wasting the enemy, so long as their backs are in his sights.
Is that how he earned the label: 'crack' shot?
I think he's that guy that went to Viet Nam
I thought he was the guy who was in Cambodia at Christmas .
Yep. That used to be seared - seared in my brain, but somehow I forgot.
The truth is an absolute defense.
I doubt that John O'Neill can be intimidated.
But sKerry has to get over the first hurdle, see: http://img42.exs.cx/img42/7651/KerryGrimmace2.jpg
To read the latest on the Franchurian Candidate's bizzare exploits, click the picture, goto "last," and work backwards:
If you would like to help the Swift Boat Vets ( as I have, and I urge all to do-- even a few dollars will help ) kindly click on this logo:
Take a look at these short video clips, especially the last one. You will walk away with a heavy heart.
O'Neill spent half of his time PLEADING for Kerry to try just that. That's how the documentation would be more likely to get out - on discovery. I can't count how many times O'Neill BEGGED Kerry to sue him. And Kerry wouldn't even seem to consider it.
That's very simplistic. There are a couple of errors concerning the 13 MAR incident, such as mention of a PCF-35 (which Corsi based on Brinkley's book, I guess). It doesn't matter. And the mistake that Screamin' Larry O'Donnell harped on was O'Neill suggesting that the last line of the report indicated who sent it, rather than who received the message in a separately typed line. But there seems good reason to believe the assertion that Kerry was its source based on the time it was sent, and just who would have been around at that time of night on the US Coast Guard Spencer, which has been identified by the sender's routing indicator.
I was, in fact, one of those principally involved in the threads at the Swiftie site where this mistake was uncovered, based on historically later documentation of what these messages contained, how they were blocked, etc. The other, 'NavyChief', who had discovered this timeline and series of likelihoods later on, and myself and others were quick to point out that while the former was a mistake in reading the dispatches, the latter essentially makes a very tight argument that the original assertion was true. In fact, this was precisely what O'Neill was trying to say as Larry performed his very bad Sam Kinnison impression on national tv. A) none of the other officers that day now claim to have written it - leaving only Droz, who was KIA shortly afterward. B) it's an account that favors Kerry and seems to ignore the essential events when he went absent down river. And C) only Pees and Kerry would still have been aboard when the message sent.
The only other complaint Kerry might have is what turned out to be the main complaint with Kerry, that day, just noted above. It's not whether they received fire. That's logically ludicrous if one examines the action reports. The main complaint with Kerry was that he fled in the face of what he believed was hostile enemy fire. Thus, there appeared to be a pattern by his Sandusky and Thorsen, et al, to constantly brag of Kerry's bravery, of facing fire, even of being eager to join the Navy because he was 'gung-ho' for firefights, all of which was contradicted by other accounts even favorable to Kerry; and all an obvious cover for how Kerry behaved, generally, and specifically that day. In fact, if people remember the idea that Kerry fled in the face of what he believed was enemy fire, that one idea, alone, might have cost him the election with many voters.
This proves the selflessness of John O'Neill. He knew this, before he ever wrote one word of "Unfit". He was willing to go through the risk and cost of being sued, just to get Kerry to sign the SF-180!
This is a compassionate man and we all owe him our sincerest gratitude!
Well put and on the money! The man is literally a head case in need of isolation, like a jail cell, (I wanna see him suffer for a looooooong time).
Now, "the Kerry camp is thinking about filing a libel lawsuit against Regnery and O'Neill," a source close to the candidate's inner circle tells PAGE SIX. "I don't know if they will actually go forward, but consideration is serious. If Kerry plans on running again in 2008 -- and I'm hearing he will -- it would make sense that he'd file the suit." |
|
Kerry plans on running again in 2008? Hmmm... Lemme see.... Let's do the math.... |
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
