This should stimulate some lively discussion, not to mention photos.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: ElkGroveDan
calling bruce springsteen!
2 posted on
11/17/2004 11:07:43 AM PST by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: ElkGroveDan
For a creature that's "made for running" we certainly don't run very fast.
3 posted on
11/17/2004 11:07:52 AM PST by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: ElkGroveDan
To: ElkGroveDan
Fish gotta swim
Birds gotta fly
I love one man till...
I think they're onto something here.
5 posted on
11/17/2004 11:10:04 AM PST by
Lee Heggy
(Never tell a lie--except for practice. Mark Twain)
To: ElkGroveDan
What a silly theory. Any quadruped can outrun us -- even quadrupedal apes.
7 posted on
11/17/2004 11:10:40 AM PST by
Rytwyng
(we're here, we're Huguenots, get used to us)
To: ElkGroveDan
To: ElkGroveDan
Humans were born to run. And to walk.
But I don't believe they were born to jog. Shin splints, stress fractures and spine problems are the reward for splitting the difference between running and walking, and then doing it for years on end.
10 posted on
11/17/2004 11:12:39 AM PST by
SBprone
To: ElkGroveDan
Someone forward this post to Nick the Greek.
13 posted on
11/17/2004 11:16:15 AM PST by
Beckwith
(John Kerry is now a kept man . . .)
To: ElkGroveDan
Big buttocks are also importantBwahahahahaha!!!!!!! Can you say "ghetto-booty"?
I knew you could.
14 posted on
11/17/2004 11:16:38 AM PST by
Ignatz
(Getting a great tan in the sun of my own grandeur)
To: ElkGroveDan
To the best of my knowledge, there is absolutely no proof of evolution occuring at the macro- level. We have observed it at the micro- level, as some species have undergone slight changes in color or size, but in the entire history of our observation of nature we have never ever witnessed, nor have evidence, one species completely changing into another.
There are so many flaws in this "law" of evolution that I cannot help but laugh hysterically at anyone who takes this seriously as an explanation of the generation of species.
16 posted on
11/17/2004 11:16:58 AM PST by
mike182d
To: ElkGroveDan
I love running. Funny thing, the eliptical machine actually has improved my form and is helping to make me faster.
22 posted on
11/17/2004 11:25:53 AM PST by
Porterville
(IT'S GOOD TO BE REPUBLICAN- ASK ME HOW)
To: ElkGroveDan
"Humans were born to run..."
Humans were meant to be born.
24 posted on
11/17/2004 11:26:40 AM PST by
diamond6
(Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
To: ElkGroveDan
"We do it because we are good at it. We enjoy it and we have all kinds of specializations that permit us to run well," said Daniel Liberman, a professor of anthropology at Harvard University in Massachusetts. Bull puckey. I hate running. It kills my knees and ankles. Only pointy-headed fitness freaks think running is good for you.
25 posted on
11/17/2004 11:27:35 AM PST by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: ElkGroveDan
They suspect modern humans evolved from their ape-like ancestors about 2 million years ago so they could hunt and scavenge for food over large distances. But the development of physical features that enabled humans to run entailed a trade off -- the loss of traits that were useful for being a tree-climber. I find Elaine Morgan's Aquatic Ape Theory to be the most credible.
27 posted on
11/17/2004 11:28:56 AM PST by
Maceman
(It's no longer a blue world, Max!!)
To: ElkGroveDan
Sounds to me this researcher has a bum fetish
29 posted on
11/17/2004 11:29:55 AM PST by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: PatrickHenry
Heads up.
30 posted on
11/17/2004 11:30:18 AM PST by
Fatalis
To: kjenerette
See Kate Run. Run Kate Run.
32 posted on
11/17/2004 11:31:55 AM PST by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic - If we can keep it!)
To: ElkGroveDan
I stand erect and have an opposable thumb so that I can get the beer off of the top shelf at the liquor store.
36 posted on
11/17/2004 11:34:37 AM PST by
zygoat
To: ElkGroveDan
No mention of our knees.....the first thing to go under the pounding of running.
37 posted on
11/17/2004 11:34:53 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: ElkGroveDan
If this theory is true, then why haven't the other apelike critters that run evolved into our physical structure? Why is there still a difference?
Answer: because G-- created all critters. And he created us with the ability to evolve -- BUT ONLY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF OUR GENETIC CODING.
We are separated genetically from the other primates. Always have been, always will be.
The fact that these evolutionists have to keep citing assumed behavior as a reason for evolving proves that they acknowledge that environmental circumstances trigger our evolving within our limits and that we never can evolve beyond our limits. If we could, we'd all be able to run as fast as a leopard all day long because that would have provided the most assured success in hunting. But leopards can't run fast for very long. And we can't run very fast at all. We've had enough time to evolve to perfection, but we haven't. We're limited by our genes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson