Posted on 11/16/2004 9:02:12 PM PST by CHARLITE
John Kerry, a terrible candidate who did everything wrong, was a real Michael Dukakis version 2.0. In fact, Kerry ran such a poor campaign that I think we in the GOP should examine the Kerry campaign and try to learn from it, so we don't make the same mistakes. With that in mind, here are what I believe were the top eleven reasons why John Kerry lost the election.
I'm Talking 'Bout the Man John Kerry Sees in the Mirror. Put simply, John Kerry was an awful candidate for the presidency in almost every way imaginable. He's a dovish Massachusetts liberal who originally made a name for himself as an anti-war protester, he has a mediocre Senate career, and John F. Kerry isn't especially charismatic or likable. The fact that the Democrats chose this stiff in the first place was bad enough, but when you consider that the general consensus after the Democratic primaries was that Kerry was the most ''electable'' candidate in the field, you have to go, ''Whoa, just what were these people thinking''?
(Excerpt) Read more at chronwatch.com ...
Swiftees
The #1 reason in my book:
He was a lousy candidate who only made it close by constructing a "plan" having no basis when compared to his record and benefiting from a coordinated attacks by the media and others, including the 527's.
This election s/n/h/b as close as it was.
The BIGGEST REASON democrats lose is because the think they should always WIN. The fact is Bush WON because of his IDEAS not because Kerry Lost due to his crappy campaign.
Very well put.
Honest Americans don't like scumbags?
Hawkins also missed a few gaffes, notably the Kerry comment about crooks and liars (when he thought his microphone was off), the "voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it," comment, and the TehRAYzuh "shove it" retort. Each one by itself was nothing much, but taken together, they painted a picture of incompetency. As I recall, the President did not make any stupid or insensitive remarks.
John Kerry, a terrible candidate who did everything wrong, was a real Michael Dukakis version 2.0. In fact, Kerry ran such a poor campaign that I think we in the GOP should examine the Kerry campaign and try to learn from it, so we don't make the same mistakes. With that in mind, here are what I believe were the top eleven reasons why John Kerry lost the election.
I'm Talking 'Bout the Man John Kerry Sees in the Mirror. Put simply, John Kerry was an awful candidate for the presidency in almost every way imaginable. He's a dovish Massachusetts liberal who originally made a name for himself as an anti-war protester, he has a mediocre Senate career, and John F. Kerry isn't especially charismatic or likable. The fact that the Democrats chose this stiff in the first place was bad enough, but when you consider that the general consensus after the Democratic primaries was that Kerry was the most ''electable'' candidate in the field, you have to go, ''Whoa, just what were these people thinking''?
Vietnam Part 1: Could You Shut up About Vietnam Already? One of the poorest decisions the Kerry campaign made was to try to make John Kerry's Vietnam experience the centerpiece of the campaign. While Americans certainly admire military service, it's not enough to carry someone to the presidency. That should have been obvious to everyone given that Bill Clinton beat George Bush, Sr., Bob Dole.
Moreover, how Kerry thought he could go though an entire presidential campaign running as a war hero without the public ever being truly informed about some of the despicable things he did while he was protesting the war is beyond me. It would be like running Mike Tyson for president because he was heavyweight boxing champ of the world and expecting that the time he bit off part of Evander Holyfield's ear would never come up. It just doesn't work that way.
Vietnam Part 2: Friendly Fire. The ''Swift Boat Vets for Truth'' spent all of August savaging John Kerry and they continued to hammer away, albeit not as effectively as they did initially, until the end of the campaign. And the damage they did to Kerry's likability ratings, particularly among veterans, was significant. In fact, I think it's entirely possible that had the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth not come along, John Kerry might have been the 44th President of the United States.
The conventional wisdom among Democrats today is that Kerry was too slow to respond to the Swifties, but the real problem is that Kerry was never able to mount an effective response. Kerry didn't release his military records, spent more than a month dodging press conferences, and to the best of my knowledge never personally tried to refute any of the charges against him.
That's despite the fact that the campaign had to do major backtracking about Kerry's mythical trip to Cambodia and how he behaved in the battle in which he received his bronze star. This is an issue that SHOULD HAVE been brought up and explored during the Democratic primaries and the fact that it only became a big issue in August of this year, after it had been talked about incessantly on talk radio and the net, gives you an idea of what lapdogs for Kerry the mainstream media were this year.
A Pretty Smile and a Great Head of Hair Do Not a VP Make. At the time he was picked, John Edwards seemed like about as good of a choice as anybody Kerry could have selected short of John McCain. But Edwards turned out to be a dud--a pretty dud with a great head of hair, mind you--but a dud nonetheless. Edwards was beneath the media radar practically from the time he was chosen onward, only surfacing to get schooled by Dick Cheney in the VP debate and to produce the most ridiculous quote of the entire
campaign, ''If we do the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve will get up out of that wheelchair and walk again.''
While elections don't generally hinge on the selection of a vice president, I'm sure Kerry wishes that he would have at least selected someone who could carry his own state.
Convention of the Damned! OK, maybe that title is overdoing it a little, but the Democrats' fake dog-and-pony-show of a convention was a major failure that barely boosted Kerry in the polls at all.
Part of the problem was that the Democratic Party lacks star power these days. Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Howard Dean, Max Cleland, Jesse Jackson, and Al Sharpton? This is not a group of people in whose hands you want to place your political life.
On top of that, the convention was bland, wasn't heavy on the issues, was free of attacks on Bush, centered entirely too much on Vietnam, and featured a stunningly dull, yet long speech by Kerry in which he barely even discussed his 20 years in the Senate.
This was a golden opportunity squandered and Kerry's campaign never truly recovered from it.
I'm Against Gay Marriage--Sort Of. While John Kerry did say he thought marriage was between a man and woman, most people sensed he was at best straddling the fence on the issue. That's because Kerry didn't support a Constitutional Amendment to protect marriage, he wasn't for any of the 11 state bans on gay marriage that were on ballots across the country, and he had little to say to those in his party who insisted that anyone who was against gay marriage was a backwards homophobe.
Well, when you get on the wrong side of 5,000 years of human history, you're going to turn a lot of people off. Bill Clinton understood that and told Kerry to back the local bans on gay marriage, but Kerry chose not to take Clinton's advice and paid for it at the polls.
I'll Take Dick Cheney's Daughter Is a Lesbian for $1000 Alex! After John Edwards went off on a tangent about Dick Cheney's daughter, Mary, being a lesbian in their debate, it drew a lot of attention. In fact, when ''Saturday Night Live'' did a parody of the debate, that's something even they focused on extensively.
So when John Kerry brought it up AGAIN in his third debate with George Bush, it stood out like a sore thumb. People perceived it--quite correctly I might add--as an attempt by Kerry to use Dick Cheney's daughter against him. The idea was to appeal to homophobes who Kerry thought might vote for him if they knew Dick Cheney's daughter was a lesbian. As John Kerry found out to his dismay, going after the other guy's child is not something the public generally appreciates.
at the time that Kerry made his remark, it didn't seem like the remark or quip that everyone would be talking about later, but past debates have often hinged on exactly such small turns of phrase. In this case, it stopped the momentum Kerry had been building by winning all three debates and left him a couple of points behind Bush in the polls, where he essentially stayed for the rest of the election.
Flip-Flop? I got Your Flip-Flop Right Here! Look, all politicians change their minds about certain issues. But Kerry's positions on the issues seemed to depend almost on who he was talking to, especially when it came to the war. We're talking about a guy here who said it was the ''right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein'' but that it was the "wrong war, wrong place, wrong time,'' that we'd be ''better off without Saddam Hussein'' before the war, and that we shouldn't have invaded afterwards, and who claimed Iraq was ''critical to'' and also a ''distraction from'' the war on terror.
If you want to be president of the United States, especially during a war, you've got to be willing to take a firm stand on the major issues. John Kerry never did.
War, Domestic Issues, and Shrum. This is going to be hard for a lot of liberals to accept, but from day one, John Kerry never had the slightest chance of being competitive with George Bush on security issues. Among other things, Bush is a hawkish conservative who led the country through 9/11, knocked off Saddam and the Taliban, and wrapped up two-thirds of Al-Qaeda's leadership. The idea that a dovish liberal, who wasn't a cold warrior, who voted against the Gulf War, and who voted not to fund the war in Iraq was going to beat George Bush on security issues was pure fantasy. Yet, the Kerry campaign focused incessantly on national security which ironically helped to convince voters that it was the most important issue of the campaign. Why did the Kerry people try to keep picking a fight that they could never win? Somebody ask Bob Shrum because I don't have an explanation.
Why Did Kerry Want to Be President? Who Knows? Like him or hate him, people had a pretty good idea of why George Bush wanted to be president. He wanted to continue to fight the war on terror, to make his tax cuts permanent, and to amend the Constitution to protect marriage.
Now, why did John Kerry want to be president? Nobody's really sure, but I think it had something or another to do with Vietnam. The Kerry campaign didn't center the campaign around any big issues, but instead they simply latched on to whatever the issue of the moment was and that just wasn't enough for the voters. At some point, John Kerry needed to give people some compelling reasons to vote for him and not just against George Bush, but Kerry wasn't up to the task.
It's the Lawyers Stupid! I firmly believe that in 2002 and 2004, all the talk by Democrats about bringing in hordes of lawyers to ''make sure every vote is counted'' ironically cost them a lot of swing votes.
Americans absolutely HATED the contested election of 2000, they loathe the idea of lawyers being involved in the process at all, and they find the concept of a candidate trying to win in the court room after failing at the ballot box to be repulsive. By so publicly ''lawyering up,'' John Kerry undoubtedly turned off a lot of potential voters and helped to give Bush a little boost right before people went to the polls.
bttt
Number 111
He's a TRAITOR!!
I got a bunch more, if you'd like:
1. The amazing lack of specifics in any Kerry Policy. That even President Bush never asked Kerry about specifics when he made an outlandish claim (I can repair alliances, I can balance the budget AND pay for 4 trillion in new spending, etc, etc) struck me from day one. Kerry issued edicts and floated ideas and never backed them up with facts or anything else of substance.
2. Slick Don't Wash off, and Neither Does Stupid. Kerry tried to be too cute by half: fending off the Deaniacs on the far left and attempting to placate the core democratic voters (i.e. unions and blacks) at the same time. This led to "I voted for it before I voted against it" and other nonsense. Kerry was just not a) slick enough to work it and b) smart enough to ignore it. He could have easily ignored Dean, but instead they saw how much money he had raised and figured theyhad to find some way to cater to the shrillest part of the electorate.
3. If you don't have something nice to say, shut up. Or even if you do have something nasty to say, make sure you can back it up. John Edwards, attack poodle extrordinaire, has never learned this lesson. In fact, neither did Kerry.
4. Selective Memory kills. This can be said about everything that came out of Kerry's mouth from Vietnam to what intelligence was available prior to 9/11 to the factthe man had accomplished nothing in 20 years in government. When Kerry did mention any of these things, he only mentioned the good things -- mostly invented -- and left himself open to ridicule and attack.
5. Whining is not a defense - when Kerry or Edwards was caught out on something (Swift Boats, Cambodia, Cheney's Daughter, etc) the response was to whine about how vicious the other side was being in a) pointing out the gaffs and lies and b) how effective the Republicans were in deflating every Kerry argument. Hardly presidential behavior.
6. Fake Tans. This says it all.
7. Anger is not a reason to vote for someone. Democrats could be angry about 2000 (the fact that they got caught attempting to steal an election always makes them irrationally angry -- after alll, this stuff works in Chicago), but that did not translate into what they would have done differently than GW Bush. In stead of crying about 4 years ago, they should have been making a case. Then again, when faced with a choice between rational thought and emotion, democrats cling to emotion like shipwrecked sailors to a floating mainmast.
8. Lieberman was wounded by association. Joe Lieberman, in my opinion, could have won where Kerry lost. Unfortunately, he was tagged as Al Gore's also-ran and democrats not only bury their dead, they bury their wounded as well. This left a choice between Dean and Kerry, and since Dean would never fly, Kerry became the default choice of the party.
9. Rich guys shouldn't be talking about the plight of "working families". Both Kerry and Edwards are multi-millionaires (Kerry via marriage and Edwards via the corrupt personal injury field of law). A guy who windsurfs, rides $8,000 bicycles, has use of his wife's plane, owns homes in Martha's Vineyard, Sun Valley and the best neighborhoods in Boston and Washington D.C., has no idea what working families face on a daily basis. If you needed proof of this, just recall the visit to Wendy's for the Edward's "aniversary party".
10. Finally, someone had to be sacrificed to save Hilary for 2008. There was no way Hilary could beat Bush after 9/11 and the success in Afghanistan, so, nine losers fought for a nomination that would not get them elected to dog catcher in any other time (with the exception of Lieberman). Whoever got thrown out there this time was bound to lose in order to protect the sainted Hilary, so that she would not have to run against Bush. Incidentally, watch how quickly she becomes a born-again conservative-democrat in the next few months.
Anyways, that's my take on it...
Elementary: vote fraud...10M votes kerry.
Media propanganda/spin...15M votes kerry most of which would've gone to Bush if the media were unbiased.
Result: Roughly 75M votes Bush...35M votes kerry or better than 2 to 1 in favor of Bush.
Glad Bush won, but it is scary that 48% of the voters would have this pig be prez, ain't it? How close we come, tooo often for my nickel.
my sentiments exactly
Take a number! TheresahhhHH
It was close because too many Americans still get their news from the MSM, which savaged Bush at every turn and didn't scrutinize Kerry at all (nor even print or broadcast a reasonably complete bio which would have been bad enough).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.