Just kidding.
But really, why do we care?
Posted on 11/16/2004 12:30:33 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
Bush campaign mum on any openly gay staffers Cheney runs father’s campaign but other advisers said ‘guarded’ about sexual orientation
By ADRIAN BRUNE Friday, May 28, 2004
When George W. Bush ran for president in 2000, he refused to meet with the Log Cabin Republicans.
But eventually — after he clinched the GOP nomination and was eager to brandish his image as a “compassionate conservative” — he met with the so-called “Austin 12,” a group of gay party activists who supported his candidacy.
In early April of that year, the dozen handpicked supporters, including D.C. Council member David Catania, flew to Austin, Texas, for what turned out to be an emotional meeting with the candidate at campaign headquarters.
Those present said at the time that Bush listened carefully to the Austin 12, declared himself a “better man” for having heard their concerns, and pledged to keep in place gay-friendly executive orders. In turn, his gay supporters helped Bush reap an estimated 25 percent of the gay vote.
Four years later, Bush has formally called for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and alienated not only members of the Austin 12, but also any openly gay Republican previously willing to work on his campaign, according to Catania.
“I would be completely surprised if there were any gay staffers in his campaign, at least in the upper echelon,” Catania said. “I don’t think that we’re welcome.”
It’s a factor that Catania said he believes will cost Bush the election, just as Barry Goldwater’s dismissal of blacks and the Civil Rights Act in 1964 resulted in sweeping victory for Lyndon Johnson, he said.
Mary Cheney, Dick Cheney’s openly gay daughter, works as director of vice-presidential operations, but the Bush table otherwise remains devoid of openly gay advisers.
“I’m not going to comment or provide information on the private activities of campaign staff,” said Bush campaign manager Ken Mehlman, when asked if there were out gays among the president’s campaign advisers. “The president is leading based on principle. His principles are reflective of his values and his values are compassionate and conservative.”
Gay political organizations, both partisan and nonpartisan, have so far declined to formally reprimand the Bush campaign on its lack of diversity. Publicly, they continue to stay on message by denouncing Bush’s policies, not his staff.
In the closet Yet, many gay Republicans, including some at Log Cabin, insist that there is in fact gay representation at the top level of the operation. But in an attempt to avoid an ’80s-style outing campaign against prominent members of the party, members of Log Cabin and the Austin 12 have refused to divulge any information about the lives of Bush’s closeted staffers.
“The reality is there are gay men and women working in tons of Republican offices, in the White House and in the president’s re-election campaign,” said Chris Barron, Log Cabin’s political director, repeating a quote he gave last month to the New York Times Magazine. “That’s all Log Cabin is willing to say on the matter.”
Patrick Guerriero, the executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, said he has attended White House events, including one in which he personally asked the president not to endorse the amendment.
Bush’s support for the amendment has sent some gay Republican reeling. Now that conservatives have seized upon same-sex marriage as a wedge issue, many gay Hill staffers and campaign aides — who were largely hired before the marriage issue erupted — either personally fear for their jobs if they come out, or have been asked to keep their sexual orientation a secret, Republican staffers told the Blade.
“If gay advisers on the Bush campaign are smart and if they want a future, I expect they are being very guarded about their sexual orientation,” Catania said.
Top Bush team varies in ideologies The top advisers on the Bush campaign — the approximately 15 in touch daily with Karl Rove, Bush’s top strategist — actually represent an array of Republican political ideologies. They range in spectrum from campaign chair Marc Racicot, the gay-friendly former governor of Montana, to legislative director Elise Finley, who came to Bush headquarters from her position as chief of staff to Rep. John Shaddegg (R-Ariz.), a strong opponent of gay rights.
Catania, who raised $80,000 for the president’s campaign before he dropped his support after Bush’s amendment remarks, calls the most visible Bush campaign staffer, Ken Mehlman, “the finest person I’ve met on the Bush campaign.”
Mehlman, a Maryland native and graduate of Harvard Law School, ascended through the Bush ranks during the 2000 campaign, after which he landed as director of political affairs at the White House. Known as a savvy political operative and for his businesslike demeanor, Mehlman leads the 173-member staff at campaign headquarters in Arlington, as well as the 110 additional field operatives across the country.
Mehlman has remained personally silent on gay issues — strictly echoing the president’s posture — but he has also met with the Log Cabin Republicans in his former capacity in the administration, according to Kevin Ivers, a political consultant.
“The president believes a marriage is between a man and a woman, and there are appropriate structures in place for legal arrangements between gay couples,” Mehlman said in a brief interview last week.
Unmarried and has few hobbies outside of politics, Mehlman has called his vocation, his “avocation.” At the age of 37, he supervises the spending of more than $250 million to re-elect the president.
Future of the GOP Racicot, the other top adviser to the campaign that Catania mentioned as gay friendly, angered Christian conservatives in March 2003 when he addressed 300 members of the Human Rights Campaign, just two months before Bush named him campaign chair when he was still heading up the Republican National Committee.
“Marc Racicot is the future of the party. I imagine he has to hold his nose a lot of the time in this campaign,” Catania said. “If the rest of the party operated according to Racicot’s views, it wouldn’t be in such trouble.”
While governor of Montana, Racicot enacted a state employee non-discrimination policy that included sexual orientation, attempted to repeal the state’s sodomy law in 1993 and opposed legislative efforts in 1995 to add gay people to Montana’s sexual offenders’ registry. The HRC praised the Bush administration’s selection of Racicot to lead the Republican National Committee in December 2001.
However, selections such as Finley and Southeast chair Ralph Reed, the former director of the Christian Coalition, diminish the efforts of Bush’s progressive leaders in the campaign, prominent Republicans say. Unlike Kerry, Bush does not have a liaison to gay voters, and the campaign roster lists no other minority outreach adviser.
Catania, once a Bush delegate to this summer’s GOP convention, now echoes the social viewpoints of Democrats when it comes to diversity and the campaign. He has rescinded his once strong support for Bush, choosing instead to abstain from voting in this election.
“The president and his advisers have no interest in having gays and lesbians be a part of his team, nor do they have much interest in having anyone else but a bunch of middle-aged white guys,” Catania said. “They wonder why they have only 6 percent of the African-American vote, for example, but I don’t think it occurs to them that their staff reflects their priorities.”
I agree, who cares? He gets the job done doesn't he?
Those who are concerned should get over themselves.
David Catania is not to be trusted. He is a RINO on the D.C. City council and has become increasingly liberal and shrill in recent years, sort of like Andrew Sullivan. His homosexuality is now the only thing that matters to him politically. I used to like him a lot but now I can't stand him. Only in D.C. would he even be considered a Republican.
Gee, he's finally getting the message?
and covered in a light coat of oil....
Is his apartment neat?
As I haven't seen him storming San Francisco for a marriage license or parading half naked down the streets of New York stimulating a sex act, I don't really care.
He's proven to be competent, he deserves the position.
BTW, I'm beginning to wonder at subversives seeking to fracture Christians from the Republicans. First Kerry attacks Mary Cheney, then people run around saying the nominated AG is not fit to serve because he may be pro-Life, now a rumor campaign about Mehlman's sexuality.
Unlike the left, I know the actual meaning of tolerance. If the person is competent I can disagree with them on social issues and still support them in high positions. It doesn't mean my stance on those social issues is weakened in any way, nor that I'll be silent on homosexuality or pro-life issues. t is the intolerant Left that doesn't know how to balance the two, as their meltdown following the election is proving.
oh my. lol
Just kidding.
But really, why do we care?
OH MAN! That made me laugh so hard...
DOH!!! Sorry I had already hit the trigger before reading.
Ask Michael Huffington or David Drier, they might know.
And got 25 percent of the gay vote.
I agree, if the man is keeping his sexuality private, then no one needs to know what his sexual preference is.
correction-then people run around saying the nominated AG is not fit to serve because he may be pro-choice
He hasn't told.
It's not about sex. It's about loyalty.
Good one! LOL
Thaks for the correction.
I've never seen that picture before. I think I can go another 40 years without seeing it again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.