Skip to comments.
PETERSON GUILTY (Guilty 1st Deg M/Laci, Guilty 2nd Deg M/Conner w/Special Circumstances)
Posted on 11/12/2004 11:24:19 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
News Alert: Scott Peterson Verdict to be announced today at 4:00 Eastern Time.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: capitalpunishment; deathpenalty; dudeisgonnafry; guilty; guiltyguilty; hanghim; peterson; stringhimup; veryguilty; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,460, 1,461-1,480, 1,481-1,500 ... 1,781-1,785 next last
To: Desecrated
Well it taints the evidence....and the conviction since it is against the law...for jurors to do experiments. It was a huge mistake by the judge to allow this.
To: elizabetty
I remember the exact show you are talking about-- It was Greta and she had her "gang" on and Geragos was one of them. Geragos and the guy from Minnesota? (can't remember name-longish hair) both said THEY wouldn't want to defend him because it looked like a SLAM DUNK.
1,462
posted on
11/12/2004 2:11:11 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Proud to be a Texan)
To: SheLion
What little I have watched Nancy, she was adament that there was nothing to convict Scott on. What you may be thinking of is her saying that there was no direct evidence in this case to convict. That's quite true - it's a very circumstantial case, nothing directly tying the defendant to the crime.
But IMHO the circumstantial evidence is pretty damning. Apparently the jury thought so too.
1,463
posted on
11/12/2004 2:11:29 PM PST
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: MaryJaneNC
...and the "testing" of evidence by a juror will allow for an appeal.Did you miss the part where that juror kicked that juror off?
And Judge Napolitano thinks there will BE appeals (aren't there always?) and listed some of the things that could be appealed; I haven't heard him say that those appeals will be granted.
1,464
posted on
11/12/2004 2:12:03 PM PST
by
Howlin
(I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
To: Desecrated
Most of the legal experts said the evidence was not there. It could indeed be a reversal on appeal.
To: MaryJaneNC
but that is my whole point it was not actuaally an experiment b/c the jury could not have come to any valid conclusion b/c the boat was not in the water. thus harmless error.
1,466
posted on
11/12/2004 2:12:31 PM PST
by
Desecrated
(A nickel of every tax dollar should go toward the defense of America)
To: Desecrated
I doubt that it will be even granted a hearing; this judge has covered his butt from Day One.
1,467
posted on
11/12/2004 2:12:39 PM PST
by
Howlin
(I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
To: radiohead
Yeah, I'm outa the trial business too.
A busy trial practice and a gaggle of children don't mix well at all. I started looking to bail when I missed my daughter's kindergarten Christmas pageant (boo on the judge who set a trial for CHRISTMAS EVE!)
1,468
posted on
11/12/2004 2:12:45 PM PST
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: Desecrated; MaryJaneNC
BTW, death penalty cases are automatically appealed in most cases; I don't know about CA though.
1,469
posted on
11/12/2004 2:13:26 PM PST
by
Howlin
(I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
To: UncleSamUSA
It ain't SF and it ain't LA....therefore, those people voted Bush.....
What a great month. Republican government. Muslim lunatic dead. Castro sick. Peterson fries. Marines winning. Democrats whining, and it's only the 12th.
1,470
posted on
11/12/2004 2:13:39 PM PST
by
Hi Heels
(Proud to be a Pajamarazzi.)
To: AnAmericanMother
Doesn't circumstantial evidence carry the same weight as hard evidence in law?
To: Prime Choice
I hope he gets the death penalty. He's eligible for it with the special circumstance. I hope he fries as well.
Actually, here in Cali, he'd get the "triple cocktail". But in this case, I wouldn't mind the "Green Mile" treatment...though in the spirit of humanity, you must wet the sponge.
1,472
posted on
11/12/2004 2:14:22 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(The drive for 60 in the Senate begins NOW: only 725 days left until the Midterm Elections!)
To: AnAmericanMother
But IMHO the circumstantial evidence is pretty damning. Apparently the jury thought so too. Not just the jury. A lot of us believed that Snott was guilty of this horrible crime. We are very thankful he didn't walk out of there today, a free man.
1,473
posted on
11/12/2004 2:14:31 PM PST
by
SheLion
(President Bush received MORE votes ever in the period of History. The Rats need to get over it.)
To: AnAmericanMother
Look at Gloria Alredd's bottom lip. She's got a fat lip. On the left side. Weird.
1,474
posted on
11/12/2004 2:14:32 PM PST
by
gg188
To: Howlin
yes it is automatically appealed for years in cali as well
1,475
posted on
11/12/2004 2:14:44 PM PST
by
Desecrated
(A nickel of every tax dollar should go toward the defense of America)
To: Not just another dumb blonde
I have heard of murder case that have resulted in a Guilty verdit when the body was never found!!!!!!!
1,476
posted on
11/12/2004 2:14:50 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Proud to be a Texan)
To: Carolinamom
Yes, it is.
BTW, Geragos is getting totally trashed on CTV for not showing up today.
1,477
posted on
11/12/2004 2:15:00 PM PST
by
Howlin
(I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
To: lainie
"This story is more than just 'happened during a slow news cycle,' imo."
Our Troops in Fallujah is by no means a slow news cycle.
1,478
posted on
11/12/2004 2:15:10 PM PST
by
Gucho
To: Not just another dumb blonde
Well then I would put the question back to you... have you seen all the evidence? Did you hear all the testimony? Have you seen with your own eyes the exhibits that were presented? If not, you aren't in any better position than am I to judge what the jury did or did not see. I can only say that based on the little bit I heard, he seemed guilty. That, however, isn't the important part of this. The important part is that twelve people, charged with sitting and hearing the evidence for weeks, found him guilty.
Again, using your criteria ( "do you think these people didn't read the paper or watch the news?" ) no one can ever get a fair trial.
1,479
posted on
11/12/2004 2:15:17 PM PST
by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: Howlin
They are ripping MG apart on Court TV for not showing up for the verdict
1,480
posted on
11/12/2004 2:15:28 PM PST
by
Mo1
(one country, one Constitution, and one future that binds us)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,441-1,460, 1,461-1,480, 1,481-1,500 ... 1,781-1,785 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson