Most of the legal experts said the evidence was not there. It could indeed be a reversal on appeal.
that because the "legal experts" are always defendant biased - they don't want jurors using common sense.
Who are these so-called "legal experts" you are referring to?
You haven't been paying any attention at all, have you? It's a classic circumstantial evidence case.
And all the ones I saw said GUILTY; that includes Fox, CTV, and MSNBC.