Jim Robinson ping.
1 posted on
11/08/2004 5:26:24 PM PST by
mdittmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: mdittmar
We've got Specter where we want him, on the record as "not going to oppose Bush's nominees.
Not the time for bloodletting IMHO.
To: mdittmar
Ai carumba! Spector is a LIBERAL -- why can't we get the democrat media to tell it like it is? "Moderate" -- sheesh!
3 posted on
11/08/2004 5:28:13 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: mdittmar
4 posted on
11/08/2004 5:28:14 PM PST by
Cedric
To: mdittmar
Never, never, never, Specter.
5 posted on
11/08/2004 5:28:17 PM PST by
freekitty
To: mdittmar
Moderate Senator Fights for Top Judiciary PostModerateLeft of center Senator Fights for Top Judiciary Post
Much more accruate title!
6 posted on
11/08/2004 5:28:23 PM PST by
CatOwner
To: mdittmar
This is NOT about abortion. That is old news.
THIS IS ABOUT INTEGRITY. SPECTER MUST GO.
7 posted on
11/08/2004 5:28:50 PM PST by
Diogenesis
("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
To: mdittmar
It's long past the deadline for Senator Specter to come on over to the "dark side". A Republican imitating a Democrat is really not a wholesome spectacle anyway.
8 posted on
11/08/2004 5:29:00 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: mdittmar
After hearing Karl Rove on two Sunday shows,
I am all for letting the WH handle Specter.
9 posted on
11/08/2004 5:29:05 PM PST by
onyx
To: mdittmar
A moderate what? A moderate liberal maybe.
11 posted on
11/08/2004 5:30:16 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: mdittmar
Sen. Arlen Specter pledged on Monday not to oppose Supreme Court nominees just because they are anti-abortion as the moderate Republican fought to keep alive his bid to head the Senate panel that oversees judicial nominations. First off, Arlen Specter is NOT a "moderate." That's the Leftist media carrying water for him.
Second, if given the choice between letting Specter screw us AGAIN and kicking him off the Judiciary Committee, I'll opt for the latter. I'll never forget or forgive his squandering of the Clinton impeachment.
So, in the final analysis, TO HELL WITH SPECTER.
12 posted on
11/08/2004 5:30:38 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(Hey-hey! Ho-ho! Arlen Specter's gotta go!)
To: mdittmar
This is exactly why RINOs ought to be bumped off in primaries, senority being a huge liability in this case.
To: mdittmar
"He angered conservatives last week by saying he thought it unlikely the newly elected Senate... would confirm a Supreme Court nominee who wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade," Specter must be senile to even make such a stupid statement. I can't ever remember a nominee saying he wanted to overturn Roe.
What Specter really meant is that he would consider any nominee who is pro-life to be objectionable even if he has never expressed an opinion on Roe.
27 posted on
11/08/2004 5:44:16 PM PST by
bayourod
(Specter's litmus test : "No Christian Judges")
To: mdittmar
Arlie Sphincter isn't a *moderate* GOPer; Sphincter's a liberal-demokkkRAT in GOP duds.
Throw his stinking ass out!
28 posted on
11/08/2004 5:44:23 PM PST by
7.62 x 51mm
(• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
To: mdittmar
Did you hear Specter on Sean Hannity today?
Turned my stomach.
Get him out. NOW.
To: mdittmar
RINO Arlen Spectre is not a moderate. That is why he is called a RINO (Republican In Name Only).
I say that he should not be nominated or given the Senate Judiciary Committee chairmanship. I say that the be voted out of that spot, and if he wants to stomp his feet and pout and change over to the Democrat party, that would be just fine with me.
He can keep Jumpin' Jim Jeffords company. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
To: mdittmar
Moderate???? Specter is so socialist he makes Kerry look conservative.
45 posted on
11/08/2004 5:56:04 PM PST by
cynicom
(<p)
To: mdittmar
Sean Hannity interviewed Arlen Spector on his radio program this afternoon. In my opinion I do not think Spector can be fully trusted and should still be held accountable for not convicting Bill Clinton based on "Scottish Law".
I do not understand why President Bush spent so much of his political capital campaigning for Spector, but my hopes are that for the President's generous efforts that Spector will return the favor with great magnanimity.
If, however, republicans have the chance to make a bold decision as to the Chairman of the Judiciary, please let it be a very fine, upstanding conservative and not some finger in the wind moderate.
50 posted on
11/08/2004 6:00:42 PM PST by
harpo11
('W' is for We The People Are Winners!)
To: mdittmar
Jim Jeffords has nothing on this RINO puke. Drive him into obscurity ... or to the Rat party. I don't give a flip. This idiot deserves his comeuppance.
53 posted on
11/08/2004 6:04:23 PM PST by
mercy
To: mdittmar
74 posted on
11/08/2004 6:22:45 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: mdittmar
[ "Absolutely not, and it's not just what I'm saying I have done it. I have not applied a litmus test, and have voted to confirm pro-life judges," he said in a television interview ]
Calling Robert Bork, Mr. Bork please pick up the courtesy phone, Or turn on the TV at the bar and wacth this idiot..
110 posted on
11/08/2004 6:43:45 PM PST by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson