Posted on 11/08/2004 2:01:36 PM PST by Republican Radio™
there should be an intergalactic test before violence can be allowed.(/s)
$2000.00 is probably the maximum contribution directly to GWB.
Anything else would have to go through PACs or 527s.
lazy americans.
drive through banks.
drive through pharmacy
drive through food
drive by shooting.
too lazy to stand up.
(/s)
1) Corporations care nothing about people and only about profit
2) No matter what, people cannot be "evil"--it's just a matter of perspective
3) Violence is never the solution
Answer these questions truthfully and you'll find the importance of this post. Please don't fool yourself by saying your kid spends more time with you than with his friends or alone... I was a teenager once and know that's a lie.
Baaaaaahhhh, Shame on Microsoft for their bad behavior. Baaaaahhhh, I don't want to check out the facts and see if what is being said is true or not. Baaaahhhh, I just want to believe the negative and cry Shame, Shame."
It's been done before. Countless RTS games had the player play both sides before completing the game. Some, like Starcraft had the player play 3 or more sides, each one with a different perspective of a conflict.
That's the impression I get. It sounds as if the author expects players to reject the War on Terror just because they play a game that has as part of the plot, "not all foreigners are bad and should be killed, m'kay?".
It doesn't sound as if there's some sort of explicit anti-Bush mesage in the game.
Minor problem. He's not the creator of Halo. He's just one of the grunts on the project. It's like saying that you won't shop at a store because the accountant is a jerk.
Halo is a superweapon designed both to study the Flood and to destroy any 'food' in the Galaxy, to prevent it from spreading.
Guilty Spark: "This installation's blast has a maximum radius of 25,000 lightyears. But once the others follow suit, this galaxy will be quite devoid of sentient life. Or at least any of sufficient biomass to sustain the Flood."
To reiterate the facts:
If you are a fan of the original game, the writer of the sequel (who also wrote the original) is saying: "Forget what you know in Halo, the real story is my thinly veiled slap at Republicans."
In Halo 2 Barbara Streisand turns up as the end-of-level baddie.
If that's the case, do you think if the company doesn't respond to his declarations about this game that they will have essentially endorsed this grunt's views?
Joe Staten: "[Kids] could look at it as a damning condemnation of the Bush Administrations adventure in the Middle East."
Kids: "Wow, that blowed up REAL good!"
It still sounds as if Micro$oft has to provide the narrative for this, to bring out the Kerry/Moore/bin Laden complaint about enforcing the UN resolutions.
It is surprising that guy who made billions in the US would support this. One could expect this of guilty trust-fund babies or actors looking to 'be relevant'. But Gates really did make the money by selling product. Maybe he made way too much, too easily. Or may he doesn't know about this game, and how it's being promoted.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/halo_pr.html
Joe Staten
Cinematics Director
"This is bull****!" barks Staten as he twitches in his chair. He isn't complaining about a bug in the code, he's reciting one of the 17,000 lines of dialog he wrote for Halo 2. (The script is 10 times longer than the first game's.) This particular outburst comes when a player's rocket launcher gets stolen by another player, who swaps it for a far wimpier weapon - a stunt you couldn't pull off in the original game.
Staten has a flair for the dramatic. He majored in theater and briefly did improv after college. But he also knows a thing or two about commando behavior. He got a master's in military history at the University of Chicago and signed on for a two-year recruitment program with the CIA. Staten mined this experience to add secret-agent-ese and authentic spook tactics to the game. As for his flirtation with the government underworld, it didn't last. "The CIA didn't think I was enough of a son of a *****," he says.
Sure...yeah... uh huh.
Listen, the reporter who has an OBVIOUS bias, found someone connected to the game, who ALSO has an obvious bias.
Now, if this reporter was to be a fair and UN-biased reporter, then WHY did he NOT have an opposing view regarding this game??? WHY did he present one 'game developer's' opinion. Is he insinuating that there is only ONE 'game developer'? Or MAYBE he is trying to act like there is only ONE developer who was 'important'?
A person can take ANY video game and put an 'anti-Bush/anti-American' theory on it. And the reverse is also true. It all depends on what the mindset is.
I think the MOST interesting question about this guy/Halo2/ and 'the message' is....how LONG will he continue to be employed by Microsoft, now that he has taken this slam stand?
Give me a frickin' break. Didn't you learn anything from backward masking, smurf and Harry Potter witchcraft, masters of the universe apostasy, what "kiss" stands for, and the hundred other urban legends propagated through pop culture?
The people you are trying to "expose" are laughing at you.
Gee, you're right! I'm all better now. Hey, by the way; there's a guy named Michael Moore that agrees with you and has an enteraining movie he'd like you to buy on DVD for $15. He's also got a movie coming out soon he'd like you to pay $10 to see in the movie theater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.