Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's all Bush's fault!!!
1 posted on 11/07/2004 8:06:00 PM PST by joedownthestreet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: joedownthestreet

Perhaps they wanted to see an original film.


2 posted on 11/07/2004 8:07:02 PM PST by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

Shouldn't that read, "...Sherry Lansing, charwoman..."?


3 posted on 11/07/2004 8:07:59 PM PST by Lunkhead_01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

mmmm.... maybe the film just sucks??????


5 posted on 11/07/2004 8:08:41 PM PST by elephantman96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

As I pointed out on the Drudge-sourced thread on this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1273974/posts

Sarandon was in this turkey?
Well, this advice may be a bit late, but what the heck ...
______________

Rules for celebrities planning to trade on their celebrity
by taking a public position on a political issue:

1. Make sure you really have some celebrity status.

2. Plan to lose half of it.

3. Don't be surprised if you have no measurable influence.

4. Don't complain later about #2 and #3.

(1) You may discover, as Rosie and Cher did during the
Kerry campaign, that you are have fewer fans than you
imagined. If you have so few, you don't want to
discover it the hard way (#2).

(2) A silent film star was known for saying
"when a politician enters the room, I leave".
No matter what position you take, and no matter what
the outcome, if some issue is close enough that you
could make a difference, that means you are going to
annoy half your fan base, if not half of the general
population.

(3) Make sure that your fans are the kind of people
who actually make a difference in the world. Just
because they show up for you doesn't mean they vote.

(4) By "taking a stand", you are saying "this is so
important, I'm willing to bet my career on it". More
precisely, it's "I'm willing to blow half my audience".
Gambler's remorse is unbecoming for an esteemed figure
such as yourself. And if your horror is the discovery
that you had inflated celebrity and inept fans to
begin with, then we really don't want to hear about it.


6 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:08 PM PST by Boundless (Stopped sending money to Hollywood several years ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

They saw that Susan Sarandon was in it and they just froze over.


7 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:47 PM PST by wizardoz (straight, sedentary, and average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

Let's see; a movie about a self-centered abuser ... hmmm, not interested. The movie plot simply doesn't appeal to me, and it has nothing to do with how I voted.

Now, throw in some aliens, psychotic killers, and car chases ....

Given the competition (The Incredables - which truly lives and exceeds the hype!!) that is in movies right now; this movie is a garanteed box office bomb. I'm not even interested in the $1 rental.


8 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:48 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet
Gee...maybe everyone went to see "The Incredibles" a good family movie. You know...one you can actually take the kids too. Dumb hollywood types. They just can't get anything right....
9 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:56 PM PST by zlala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

Is this a duplicate?

because I noted that "the INcredibles" did 70 million..


11 posted on 11/07/2004 8:10:36 PM PST by freedumb2003 (The cool points are out the window and you got me all twisted up in the game)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet
Since "The Incredibles" did $70.7 million nationwide over the weekend, it seems unlikely that people weren't in the mood to go see a movie. They just chose the better one. Go see "The Incredibles"!!
14 posted on 11/07/2004 8:12:15 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet
"It seems to be the result of the election. Maybe they didn't want to see a guy that slept around."

Would have been a smash during the Clinton years.

15 posted on 11/07/2004 8:12:41 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

So if Kerry had won, 59 million Bush supporters WOULD have felt like seeing a movie about a womanizer?


16 posted on 11/07/2004 8:13:23 PM PST by madameguinot ("I've got political capital, and I'm going to spend it..." GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

Who needs to see a MOVIE about a womanizer,

One was elected twice to the highest office in the land.


18 posted on 11/07/2004 8:17:35 PM PST by Mr. Jazzy (Lets all see how many days Kerry shows up for his job in the Senate, NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

About this thread: what's it all about?


19 posted on 11/07/2004 8:18:58 PM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet
Bad script, actors, dialog, production and direction usually are what makes a movie tank. That and the people having no desire to see a turkey.
20 posted on 11/07/2004 8:19:12 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet
Hollywood just doesn't get it. As a consumer, I don't want to see vocal leftie Alec Baldwin in "Pearl Harbor", obnoxious Susan Sarandon in "Aflie", or pukey Cher or Barbra Streisand in anything else. Sheesh, they keep shoving these shitheads down our throats and say, Take it or leave it.

Ha ha! I'm leaving it!

23 posted on 11/07/2004 8:32:08 PM PST by Ciexyz (Bush still rules. The sun shines over America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

To paraphrase Gov. Schwarzenegger, "Why should we go see losers?"


24 posted on 11/07/2004 8:34:50 PM PST by Disambiguator (Every time a democrat is elected, God kills a kitten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

The entertainment establishment in this country is so lacking in originality and creativity that they have to keep trying to remake classics like "Alfie" instead of coming up with imaginative and innovative productions - they deserve to lose money......


25 posted on 11/07/2004 8:35:28 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

More bullsqueeze from the leftist MSM.


26 posted on 11/07/2004 8:35:35 PM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

America blames paramount for making crap movies with "celebrities" that should open their minds not their mouths.


27 posted on 11/07/2004 8:35:48 PM PST by infidel29 (America is GREAT because she is GOOD, the moment she ceases to be GOOD, she ceases to be GREAT- B.F.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joedownthestreet

Once again, Hollywood tries to remake a classic Michael Caine film and fails. First the Italian Job, now Alfie. What next a remake of Zulu with Ben Affleck?


28 posted on 11/07/2004 8:37:46 PM PST by Clemenza (Karl Rove IS Keyser Soze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson