Skip to comments.
US ready to put weapons in space
Guardian Unlimited ^
| 11/07/04
| Mark Townsend
Posted on 11/07/2004 12:34:55 PM PST by KevinDavis
America has begun preparing its next military objective - space. Documents reveal that the US Air Force has for the first time adopted a doctrine to establish 'space superiority'.
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: militaryspace; space; spacetreaty
Cool.. A few more steps that the USAF Space command become a separate miltary service..
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...
2
posted on
11/07/2004 12:35:24 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: KevinDavis
the US Air Force has for the first time adopted a doctrine to establish 'space superiority'
Good. Take and hold the high ground.
3
posted on
11/07/2004 12:36:18 PM PST
by
Max Combined
(There is in human nature generally more of the fool than of the wise.)
To: Max Combined
My guess is we already have stuff up there. But it's good to advertise it.
Space based weapons also offer a very good approach to knocking down ICBMs. At apogee, above the earth's atmosphere a high powered laser has great range, a great knockout punch, and the ability to destroy many targets.
4
posted on
11/07/2004 12:41:24 PM PST
by
ProudVet77
(W stands for Winner)
To: KevinDavis
Good.
Call me insensitive, but now I'd also like to see Bush & Co. clamp an air-tight curb on illegal immigration into the U.S.
And yes, 99.9% of the illegals pouring in are NOT Muslim terrorist. But these immigrants are a direct threat to our culture and security, too. They will destroy America just as surely as the Muslims would do, only slower.
To: KevinDavis
Documents reveal that the US Air Force has for the first time adopted a doctrine to establish 'space superiority'. The Air Force Space Doctrine has been around for years. It certainly isn't new.
/john
6
posted on
11/07/2004 12:45:27 PM PST
by
JRandomFreeper
(D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
To: KevinDavis
Ok where's that FR poster with the image of the guy with a pained look, holding his head and saying; "Aw geeze not this crap again!"? After all it is a story from the infamous Guardian Unlimited of the UK.
7
posted on
11/07/2004 12:47:48 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: KevinDavis
Good. American space superiority -- I'm all for it.
8
posted on
11/07/2004 12:50:26 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: KevinDavis; devolve; Happy2BMe; PhilDragoo
9
posted on
11/07/2004 12:50:39 PM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: KevinDavis

COOL!!
10
posted on
11/07/2004 12:51:03 PM PST
by
fat city
(Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
To: KevinDavis
Counterspace Operations reveals that destroying enemy satellites would improve the chance of victory. It states: 'Space superiority provides freedom to attack as well as freedom from attack. Space and air superiority are crucial first steps in any military operation.' Most importantly the press can't blab like the town gossip what's going on until it's over. Sort of shut down the enemies intell network. I Like that.
11
posted on
11/07/2004 12:52:07 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
Most importantly the press can't blab like the town gossip what's going on until it's over Yeah, I loved that "CNN has learned of a super-secret campaign that is to commence at 13:40 on Tuesday against the following targets" stuff.
12
posted on
11/07/2004 12:53:58 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(The cool points are out the window and you got me all twisted up in the game)
To: KevinDavis
If we don't, the Red Chinese will.
To: ProudVet77
"Space based weapons also offer a very good approach to knocking down ICBMs. At apogee, above the earth's atmosphere a high powered laser has great range, a great knockout punch, and the ability to destroy many targets."
Yeah, but that's a long extension cord. How do you power a laser with enough Wop to take down missles?
To: KevinDavis
15
posted on
11/07/2004 1:01:21 PM PST
by
Tealc
(Mail me if you want on or off my Jaffa, Kree! ping list)
To: BillyCrockett
We already have nuclear power generators in space. Solar panels charging up batteries/capacitors or even a flywheel system could work. All kinds of options. Remember that a laser is based on concentrated energy. It's all about watts/sq mm. You plant 1KW/MM and it will penetrate a missile.
16
posted on
11/07/2004 1:05:53 PM PST
by
ProudVet77
(W stands for Winner)
To: BenLurkin
Great and I hope the first strikes are in the blue areas lets clean up the U.S.A. first.
17
posted on
11/07/2004 1:50:47 PM PST
by
bikerman
To: bikerman
mmm.... Space superiority doctrine has been around for years.
18
posted on
11/07/2004 1:56:30 PM PST
by
lulo_08
To: All
19
posted on
11/07/2004 4:04:19 PM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: BillyCrockett
"Yeah, but that's a long extension cord. How do you power a laser with enough Wop to take down missles?" One design had a small nuclear charge. I.e., a bomb. One shot but what a shot.
I am not at liberty to discuss other options.
--Boris
20
posted on
11/07/2004 4:13:32 PM PST
by
boris
(The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a Leftist with a word processor)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson