Skip to comments.
U.S. Moves Toward a New Conservative Era
reuters ^
Posted on 11/07/2004 10:53:35 AM PST by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
This article title is one more example of the liftist idiology trumping their calls for the right to be uniters. The 2004 presidential campaign by the left, was an amazing thing to watch, now realizing they are now calling for unification from the right, and trashing Bush for not doing so before this. LOL, the left is just plain looney!
21
posted on
11/07/2004 11:56:29 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Lets see..... an era is a period in history of considerable duration.
It is reasonable to assert that the 2004 election occured during the current era, the Conservative Era, that began in 1980 and was pubescent by 1994. The Conservative Era is nearly a quarter century old in 2004.
Goldwater was "moving toward.
22
posted on
11/07/2004 12:01:08 PM PST
by
bert
(Peace is only halftime !)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
In the long run the illegal invasion spells doom for Conservatives and the Republican party. All victories now will be rendered null and void if we do not wake up and control the borders and round up and expel illegals.
--Boris
23
posted on
11/07/2004 12:19:49 PM PST
by
boris
(The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a Leftist with a word processor)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Chief Bush adviser Karl Rove said Republicans could become the governing party for decades. "The country is still close but it has moved in a Republican direction," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. The only way that won't happen is if the Republican party lets the Arlen Specter's of the world prevent conservative judges from being appointed. Another David Souter, Sandra Day O'Connor or Anthony Kennedy and the morale and enthusiasm of the base will reach the lowest point since before the Reagan era.
Specter has to dealt with.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Kevin Phillips, a former Republican official and political analyst who has become an outspoken critic of Bush, sees no evidence that Bush's 51-48 percent win over Kerry will lead to a significant new chapter in American politics. Another pre-Reagan era loser that doesn't have a clue. In case Mr. Phillips missed it, the shift to a permanent Republican majority in the Senate occurred in this election. There are still nine more Senate seats in red states that could easily go Republican in the future IF the Republican's don't make a major era (like failing to appoint conservative judges to the court system)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
"A man who would have lost in 2004 if 9/11 hadn't come along, was lucky 9/11 came along," said Phillips, referring to the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. "It gave his whole brand of simplistic politics a hook." ah, a bitter man's way of spinning the truth more accurately stated as "right man in the right place and time when the world dropped into the toilet"
26
posted on
11/07/2004 1:09:32 PM PST
by
King Prout
(tagline under reconstruction)
To: Matchett-PI
"... the Senate Rules may have to be changed. Hahahaha RIGHT ON!!..."Bingo!!
27
posted on
11/07/2004 9:21:36 PM PST
by
gonzo
(As a pilot, I can assure you that speed is life, and altitutude is life insurance. Read 'High Flight)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget; Carry_Okie; forester; sasquatch; B4Ranch; SierraWasp; ...
The book The Fourth Turning predicted this. It is an interesting take on history and the future.
28
posted on
11/07/2004 9:23:17 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I'm so tired of Kevin Phillips.The MSM loves people like Kevin Phillips, David Brock, Ron Reagan and Ariana Huffington -- even Pat Buchanan --because they can be characterized as former Republicans who have seen the light.
The fact that these people have virtually no following among the public means little.
29
posted on
11/07/2004 9:29:36 PM PST
by
Inyokern
To: freddiedavis
A Majority in the Senate consists of sixty Senators. In the even that neither Party should have sixty Senators, then the Senate Majority shall be commanded by the Party that last commanded a Majority. Therefore, look for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (NV) to succeed the defeated Thomas Daschle (SD) as chief obstructionist.
30
posted on
11/07/2004 9:29:52 PM PST
by
dufekin
(Four more years! Liberals, learn: whiners are losers every time.)
To: farmfriend
31
posted on
11/08/2004 3:00:59 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson