Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUBMARINES: India Develops Underwater Missile Launch
StrategyPage.com ^ | Nov 1, 2004 | Harold C. Hutchison

Posted on 11/04/2004 8:12:56 PM PST by spetznaz

November 1, 2004: Normally, a test of India’s Prithvi short-range (300 kilometers) ballistic missile would not draw notice. However, a recent test launch near Chandipur was notable – not for occurring, but from where the Prithvi was launched – underwater.

At present, five nations have ballistic missile submarines: The United States (14 Ohio-class SSBN), Russia (7 Delta IV-class SSBN and 2 Typhoons), France (a total of four SSBNs between the L’Inflexible and Le Triomphant classes – the latter are replacing the former), the United Kingdom (4 Vanguard-class SSBN), and the People’s Republic of China (one Xia-class SSBN). With the successful underwater launch of the Prithvi, India has now cleared a major technological hurdle in its effort to join this club.

Building a SSB or SSBN is difficult. First, one has to be able to build submarines. India has been working on this for a while – with their construction of six French-designed Scorpene-class diesel-electric submarines. One must also have reliable ballistic missiles – India has two in the Prithvi and the Agni. Another problem is to launch the missile successfully from underwater. The last requirement is the most important – submarines rely on stealth. Surfacing to launch a missile is a good way for a submarine to get spotted and sunk. The Prithvi will probably not be the candidate for submarine use due to its short range. Instead, the Agni-II is a more likely component, since its range is comparable to that of the Polaris A-1 (2000 kilometers to the 2200 of the Polaris).

One of India’s last major obstacles to deploying ballistic missile submarines is integrating the underwater-launch technology with a submarine design. One possible candidate is a stretched version of the Scorpene-class submarines India is building. That will only be a first step – the best nuclear deterrence submarines are nuclear-powered, which means they will not only be quiet, but they will never have to surface or snorkel to recharge their batteries. India has to be able to build both those SSBNs and the SSNs to protect them – and that will take time.

Despite those obstacles, India is well on the way to having a portion of its nuclear deterrence force in submarines.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agni; armsbuildup; india; indiannavy; missile; privthi; slbm; submarine; submarines; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
It seems India is going full-steam towards giving itself true military potence. Potence that is not merely directed at Pakistan but at China. Being able to launch SLBMs is a huge step for any country, and since only 5 nations can currently do so (the US, the UK, France, Russia and China) India is truly joining a distinct club.

As an aside: Israel has submarine launch capabilities, but the missile type is basically a cruise type (a tweaked popeye turbo). The Indian missiles are true SLBMs ....submarine launched ballistic missiles.

Anyways, this should be quite interesting. Once the Agni SLBM is fully functional it will have a 2000km range, which should be quite effective when it comes to India's sphere of influence.

Moreover India is not satisfied with just developing its own indigenous systems (which it does with Israeli and Russian assistance). It is also leasing an Akula SSN from Russia (for the enxt 10 years). The Akula is able to launch up to 12 Granat type cruise missiles, each with a range of 3,000 miles and able to deliver a 200kt nuclear warhead. But the Granat is still a cruise missile system, albeit an advanced one.

India developing SLBM capability is a huge step, and one that goes to show that in India we have an ally that is more than able to carry its own weight. And an ally that in the future (together with Russia) will be invaluable to us as we face a super-power China.

1 posted on 11/04/2004 8:12:58 PM PST by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos; sukhoi-30mki; Destro; Jeff Head

Ping.


2 posted on 11/04/2004 8:13:23 PM PST by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

I presume the US knows exactly where all opfor and "friendly"
boats are at all times.

... and China doesn't (nor does India).


3 posted on 11/04/2004 8:20:34 PM PST by Boundless (I've heard of Life Support, but it would appear that Arafat is on Death Support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Does it have a Slurpee machine?


4 posted on 11/04/2004 8:24:56 PM PST by Army Air Corps (One John is unemployed and the other will soon get a pink slip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

RFOL


5 posted on 11/04/2004 8:27:14 PM PST by madameguinot (RED STATE OF MIND IN A BLUE STATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Yep, SLBMs are a direct message from India to China.

"We can hit you anywhere, now, too".

India could already hit Pakistan anywhere.

China invaded India in 1962 and has taken territory from India up in the Himalayas. Not again.

6 posted on 11/04/2004 8:34:50 PM PST by xrp (Executing assigned posting duties flawlessly -- ZERO mistakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Yep, SLBMs are a direct message from India to China.
"We can hit you anywhere, now, too".

India could already hit Pakistan anywhere.

China invaded India in 1962 and has taken territory
from India up in the Himalayas. Not again.

Another interesting point is that India can basically fight on even terms with China in terms of a war of attrition--they both have populations of approx. 1 billion...

7 posted on 11/04/2004 8:40:14 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mylife

ping

so this is what you were telling me about when I asked you about subs, etc


8 posted on 11/04/2004 8:48:33 PM PST by Spotsy (Congratulations President Bush and Vice President Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Instant insurance policy that guarantees Pakistan would be incinerated if they got too frisky.


9 posted on 11/04/2004 8:53:04 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Capitan A'Puh to the bridge, please!


10 posted on 11/04/2004 8:54:10 PM PST by Gerasimov (John Kerry just got his SECOND dishonorable discharge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
That will only be a first step – the best nuclear deterrence submarines are nuclear-powered, which means they will not only be quiet, but they will never have to surface or snorkel to recharge their batteries

Unless they use Air Independent Propulsion. Then they will be at least as quite as a nuke, and will have plenty of submerged endurance for the SSB mission. They also don't need nearly the range for their missiles, since their principal target would be Pakistan, a country no part of which is far from the sea, and China, which is also for the most part not far from the sea.

11 posted on 11/04/2004 9:06:15 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Unless they use Air Independent Propulsion. Then they will be at least as quite as a nuke, and will have plenty of submerged endurance for the SSB mission

Dumb question, but what is Air Independent Propulsion?

I know that diesel electric subs are actually quieter than nukes, at least when they're running on batteries. The ex-UK upholder class (I think) which are now canadian subs were designed to hunt Russian nuclear subs. The only drawback was their range and the need to refuel.
12 posted on 11/04/2004 9:25:43 PM PST by Bulwark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark

China will be shaking in its boots now...


13 posted on 11/04/2004 9:31:28 PM PST by BladeLWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bulwark

A link:

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/type_212/

The propulsion system combines a conventional system consisting of a diesel generator with a lead acid battery, and an air-independent propulsion (AIP) system, used for silent slow cruising, with a fuel cell equipped with oxygen and hydrogen storage. The system consists of PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) fuel cells, providing between 30 and 50kW each. Submarines equipped with those systems are capable of long-distance submerged passage to the area of operation.


14 posted on 11/04/2004 10:07:39 PM PST by THORE JAN SVEN (De omnibus dubitantum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Does it have a Slurpee machine?

It probably does -- so they'll sell stuff to the Chinese before blowing them out of the water -- neat trick, take the money first...
15 posted on 11/04/2004 10:48:22 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Well the Indian armed forces on a whole are technically & capability vice ahead of the PLA(which is larger).The problem is that the PLA has had an insurance policy for over 40 years to India's East-Pakistan,which recieves most of it's conventional & nuke weapons from the Chinese.Everytime India has fought or come close to fight Pakistan,it would always leave a big chunk of it's air & land assets on it's Eastern Front to guard against the Chinese,thereby blunting it's massive edge against Pakistan.The only way India could potentially commit it's entire military to face China would be by nuking Pakistan out of the equation or hoping that the Taiwanese ,Japan & Vietnam(both of whom are developing strategic ties with India) stand up against China,which is easier said than done.


16 posted on 11/05/2004 12:50:26 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Between the Russians and the French, there are only 13 Ballistic subs left?

I bet everyone one of them has a US attack sub tagging along behind in the baffles.


17 posted on 11/05/2004 5:16:02 AM PST by Rebelbase (Indiscriminate reprisals strengthen the terrorists. Targeted ones weaken them. Aim is everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

You should also add the 1 Xia class sub of the PRC,though it rarely leaves Chinese waters.The Chinese are building a new class of SSBN called the type-94 which can carry 16 JL-2 ICBMs(with MIRV capability) & has infinitely better acoustics than the Xia-the number of those boats could go up to atleast 4 & once deployed,they don't even need to venture into the Pacific to launch their weapons.The Russians too are building a new class of SSBN ,now called as the 'Borei' class which will carry a new ICBM,which will be variant of the land based Topol-M.


18 posted on 11/05/2004 5:28:42 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The new Chinese boats will hit the waters by around 2006 ,while the Russian boats can be expected by 2008-09.


19 posted on 11/05/2004 5:30:48 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hi sukhoi.
Yes, I agree for the moment that India has the technical lead. But China is modernizing at a frightening rate...
The main point of my post was (given the nuclear missles
as a topic) that China has always counted on its massive population to 'ride out' an exchange compared to smaller countries such as the US. It can't do that with India.

PS Why don't you name yourself after US equipment? It's just plain better ;-)


20 posted on 11/05/2004 5:55:40 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson