Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Today: Struggles to Find Dem Guest; W Governed "from Far Right;" Teresa Blasted!
The Today Show | governsleastgovernsbest

Posted on 11/04/2004 4:47:09 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

If there's one place where Democrats know they'll receive a warm reception, it's The Today Show. So take it as a sign of the depths of Dem depression that Katie Couric had to admit this morning that "with Dems licking their wounds" it was difficult for the show to find a Dem willing to come on!

You'd think that it would have been a cinch to find a leading Republican insider to talk about W's plans for the second term. So who did Today choose? Gillepsie, Frist, Hastert, maybe even Cheney? Nope, they went to a guy firmly on the outside, Today's favorite Republican, John McCain.

Three highlights from McCain's appearance:

1. In one of the most unvarnished bits of liberal editorializing I've ever witnessed at Today, Matt Lauer expressed skepticism about W's ability to bring people together in his second term. Said Lauer: "He actually divided the country by governing from 'the far right.' Why should people trust him this time?"

2. McCain took a huge swipe at Kerry's notoriouly lackluster record as a Senator. "Speaking personally, If you work at it you can really enhance your effectiveness in the Senate," advised McCain!

3. McCain denied a Newsweek report that Kerry offered him, in return for accepting the VP nomination, control over the DOD and a say on all foreign policy

Then it was on to Katie's interview of PA Gov. Ed Rendell, who was still looking depressed. It was then that Katie mentioned Today's difficulty in booking a Dem this morning - a nice little insult to Rendell, letting everyone know he was far from the first choice!

A clearly unhappy Katie, still dressed in black, asked "the Dem Party was organized, the base energized, and W had low approval ratings. Why couldn't this be translated into victory? There must have been some problems in strategy."

Rendell cited the failure to respond quickly to the Swift Boat Vets, contrasting this with Bill Clinton's rapid response approach.

Katie: "Did Dems fail to appreciate the importance of moral issues to voters?"

Rendell's response showed that the Dems still don't get it. He tried to define family values in terms of government programs. For him, it's all about "valuing families," meaning more government child care, health care, etc.

He added it was hard to make the case with terrorism and Iraq in the background.

With rising frustration in her voice, Katie said Dems are known for getting out the vote, and asked why young people didn't show up at the polls. Rendell claimed they did, but that overall turnout was up so the effect of young people was diminished. He bragged about Kerry's win in PA.

Katie: "It was a big loss to have Daschle lose. How will the Dem party retool and go forward?"

Rendell cited 1964 and LBJ's huge victory, whereas by 1968 the Republicans had won back the WH. Rendell: "This is not a time for hand wringing and soul searching. If not for 9/11 and Iraq we'd be talking about Pres. Kerry."

Then it was on to an interview with Tim Russert.

Russert: "The party has to come to grips with itself. There is a disconnect in large parts of the country with the Dem party. Dems have to find words, language to speak to people of faith."

Note that once again, the Dems are addressing the issue in superficial terms. They discuss the need to find ways to "speak" about values, about the need to find "the right language," rather than looking into their souls and realizing that their values are simply out of synch with those of most Americans.

Russert gave his list of people he expected to leave the administration. Some were predictable: Powell, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. But I was surprised when he also mentioned Condi Rice, saying "she has to figure out what she wants to do with her career."

At the beginning of the second half-hour, Evan Thomas of Newsweek appeared to tout a special Newsweek edition telling the inside story from the campaign. By far the most interesting comments were his absolute massacring of Teresa Heinz Kerry. I couldn't type fast enough to keep up, but among his blasts at her:

"A negative for the campaign, a bad campaigner, all about her, very demanding, a drag on her husband."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: comradkatie; kerryconcession
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2004 4:47:10 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Today Show Katie-still-in-black ping.


2 posted on 11/04/2004 4:47:49 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

No doubt about it, Terrayzah was our best ally in this campaign.


3 posted on 11/04/2004 4:50:15 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Today Show Katie-still-in-black ping.

Yeesh - is she still wearing that thing? I hope she at least changed her skivvies.

4 posted on 11/04/2004 4:50:45 AM PST by asgardshill (Bad Liberal - No Kool Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Dems have to find words, language to speak to people of faith."

If you don't believe it, you can't speak it, or, as Zell Miller says, they can hum the tune, but can't sing the song.

5 posted on 11/04/2004 4:51:54 AM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill

From what I could tell, it was a different outfit. With all the Dem defeats in recent years, Katie has apparently acquired an extensive black wardrobe.


6 posted on 11/04/2004 4:52:07 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"A negative for the campaign, a bad campaigner, all about her, very demanding, a drag on her husband."

"Plus: all the press guys on the campaign bus say her mouth always tastes like gin-soaked raisins. And Elizabeth Edwards." :)

7 posted on 11/04/2004 4:52:13 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
It was then that Katie mentioned Today's difficulty in booking a Dem this morning - a nice little insult to Rendell, letting everyone know he was far from the first choice!

LOL. Thanks for the report, governsleastgovernsbest.

8 posted on 11/04/2004 4:52:17 AM PST by syriacus (I'm commanded to love appeaseniks -- but I don't have to vote for one as Commander-in-chief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Exactly. On another thread I posted yesterday, I mentioned that a local Dem I debated on a radio show said the Dems need to find a better way to deal with "the morals thing," which says all we need to know about how Dems view moral issues.


9 posted on 11/04/2004 4:53:31 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

thank you for months of going to the belly of the beast, doing an update and sharing it. you have saved me from an ulcer. Thanks again your work is appreciated.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 4:53:44 AM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

My pleasure as always, Syriacus.


11 posted on 11/04/2004 4:54:10 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

"Rendell cited 1964 and LBJ's huge victory, whereas by 1968 the Republicans had won back the WH. Rendell: "This is not a time for hand wringing and soul searching. If not for 9/11 and Iraq we'd be talking about Pres. Kerry."

I had to read this 2-3 times before I believed he said this.

Get a grip, man.


12 posted on 11/04/2004 4:54:56 AM PST by SE Mom (Reeling from re-election rapture!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

All she needs is one of those round conical straw hats, and she's ready for the next Kerry rally.


13 posted on 11/04/2004 4:55:17 AM PST by asgardshill (Bad Liberal - No Kool Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Even the basis of the program is biased;

The topic is what the Democrats did wrong, NOT what the Republicans did right!!!

14 posted on 11/04/2004 4:55:24 AM PST by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

Thanks, q-an-a. Kind comments like yours really kept me motivated.

If anyone would like to be added to my ping list for reports on liberal bias at The Today Show and occasionally at other media, please let me know by post or private message.


15 posted on 11/04/2004 4:55:40 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
1. In one of the most unvarnished bits of liberal editorializing I've ever witnessed at Today, Matt Lauer expressed skepticism about W's ability to bring people together in his second term. Said Lauer: "He actually divided the country by governing from 'the far right.' Why should people trust him this time?"

In 2000 Bush won by about 500 votes. In 2004 Bush won by 4 million +. Looks like Bush already brought 4 million people closer together.

16 posted on 11/04/2004 4:55:59 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Guess Evan Thomas feels all their 15points help for kerry edwards was ruined by dizzy tizzy. Never thought to blame his lousy america hating candidate!

As slick willie so WRONGLY declared following the 2002 elections. They didn't get their message out.

The DID get their message out, we rejected it!

Heard that slick willie issued a statement yesterday. Mentioned only in passing and go NO publicity at all as far as I can tell.

Thanks for the rundown on katie, matt, and the odious russert.

17 posted on 11/04/2004 4:56:03 AM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR POWERS EQUAL TO THE TASKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Gosh--they could have called littletommydaschle. I might have tuned in for that and I haven't watched the Today show in more than 10 years.


18 posted on 11/04/2004 4:56:11 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

I hope fellow PA voters will join me to show Rendell the door next gov. election.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 4:56:38 AM PST by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"...all about her, very demanding, a drag on her husband."

I don't agree with this. Just forget THK and think of Hillary. Whatever he could site as negative about THK went double and triple for Hillary and HER worthless husband won two terms anyway and against men much better than himself. THK was not up to standard, but way more 'likable' than Evita so I don't think she was the kind of negative element in the campaign that he says.
20 posted on 11/04/2004 4:56:47 AM PST by SMARTY ('Stay together, pay the soldiers, forget everything else." Lucius Septimus Severus, to his sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson