Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

*** OHIO REVERSES LOWER COURT THIS EARLY AM: POLL WATCHERS ALLOWED! REPORT FOR DUTY IN AM! ***

Posted on 11/01/2004 10:31:12 PM PST by InfantryMarine

**** FLASH TRAFFIC*** *** FLASH TRAFFIC ***

01:15 EST:

I just received a phone call from local B/C-04 Team Leader advising that ALL Poll Monitors WILL be allowed as per OHIO SUPREME COURT RULING W/in past hour or so reversing today's previous ruling.

REPORT FOR DUTY!!!!

PLEASE SPREAD THIS TO YOU LISTS FAR AND WIDE!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: js1138
I don't know if this is helpful but I read this in the Cincinnati Enquirer.

Under Ohio law, challengers can question a voter's identity, age, residency or citizenship before the person receives a ballot.

The precinct's presiding judge then questions the voter and decides whether he or she can cast a regular ballot or a "provisional" ballot that would not be counted until election officials determine the voter's eligibility at a later date.

When I voted this morning I noticed that another name listed on the page my name was on should have been removed. I did point this out to them and they said they would look into it.

61 posted on 11/02/2004 6:43:28 AM PST by muggs (Political Correctness and Pandering For Votes Is Going to Get Americans Killed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: muggs

All this is nice, but the roles of registered voters should be purged regularly, because a large numbe of people move or die every year. All these empty slots can be "filled" by people with false identification.

This used to be a big city joke, but now it has gone national.

I'm ready for the idea of using driver's lecenses and state IDs for voting. For the democrats this makes registration easy or automatic. For the Republicans it provides a way of detecting double voting.


62 posted on 11/02/2004 6:57:50 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
bump! I pinged my G.I. list on #44.

Go Dubya, go !!!!


63 posted on 11/02/2004 7:01:19 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I heard on the news this morning that the Supreme court declined to hear it so pollwatchers will be allowed.


64 posted on 11/02/2004 7:04:20 AM PST by SwankyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: js1138
If somebody comes in and her name is Mary Poppins, then I guess the poll watcher would perk up. I am in the burbs and there was only one poll watcher scanning the work of eight judges working over four precinct log books. I'm sure that in more urban areas they stand behind the judge and double check ID pictures and signatures.

To me, the real motivation for having poll watchers is that someone is less likely to commit fraud if they think they are being watched. Who wants to go to jail for a lousy vote? In 2000, the city of St. Louis kept the polls open until 11 PM and had dogs voting. The feds sent in observers, did nothing more, and suddenly people were done by 7 PM and no dogs voted. After all, people are less likely to shoplift if the clerk is standing at the end of the aisle. Voting is the same thing for thieves. Why risk it?

65 posted on 11/02/2004 7:10:24 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MHT

What is the real penalty for double voting? I've heard that in South Florida, early voters will be able to vote again today. This will be easy to catch, since you must sign your name, and eventually, double voters will be found.

But what is the penalty, realistically? I've never heard of anyone being prosecuted.


66 posted on 11/02/2004 7:16:50 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: js1138
An Indian woman in SD was prosecuted in federal court for voter fraud. She is in prison now. It happened after the Johnson/Thune race in 2002. That alone should be enough to scare people in SD from participating with ringleaders and messing with the feds.

There was also a Democrat precinct captain who was stopped after the election for speeding in FL and the cop found a FL voting machine with perforated ballots in the trunk. I believe that person was prosecuted but in the to-do about Florida, the story was lost.

67 posted on 11/02/2004 7:23:15 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MHT
I'm sure that in more urban areas they stand behind the judge and double check ID pictures and signatures.

In Ohio there is no picture ID required to vote.

68 posted on 11/02/2004 8:05:53 AM PST by muggs (Political Correctness and Pandering For Votes Is Going to Get Americans Killed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: InfantryMarine
NYT got it wrong on the front page.


69 posted on 11/02/2004 8:06:58 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

In my town, a few years ago they found out that a non-citizen had been voting and they deported him. I forget if he had to serve time before he was deported though. It came to light when he got called for jury duty. When they asked him if he was a citizen he said no. In Ohio we get our jury pool from registered voters.


70 posted on 11/02/2004 8:10:12 AM PST by muggs (Political Correctness and Pandering For Votes Is Going to Get Americans Killed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: InfantryMarine

just voted in franklin county oh. this is the conservative, republican portion of the corner, in the northwest. very heavy turn out. reports of 2 hour waits at 8am. i had a 1 hr turn wait at 10am. i talked to a couple of workers and they said things were going smoothly, so
far -- but this is conservative country.


71 posted on 11/02/2004 8:10:27 AM PST by mlocher (america is a sovereign state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muggs
Not requiring picture ID is the biggest problem with voting. If the country requires a passport to get in, if you are required to have one on a driver's license, if even credit cards are using pictures, and if picture ID is required to cash a check--why shouldn't picture ID with your home address on it be required to vote? Notaries use them to confirm absentee's.

We do need some sort of federal consistency between states, much like driver's licenses. Nothing about having to show a picture ID threatens individual liberty.

72 posted on 11/02/2004 8:24:09 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MHT

I agree 100%.


73 posted on 11/02/2004 8:28:38 AM PST by muggs (Political Correctness and Pandering For Votes Is Going to Get Americans Killed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson