Kerry's oh-so-clever handlers evidently depended on the ignorance of the public and the press about military records when they posted his 1978 "Honorable Discharge from the Reserves" on his site as part of a carefully selected partial release of his Navy records (the Navy says it is still withholding about 100 records). However, one diligent researcher, Thomas Lipscomb, saw through the scam and exposed it in a New York Sun story on October 13. Predictably, the major media has shunned the story. What Mr. Lipscomb noticed (and I overlooked when I first read the document) was the date of the posted discharge, Feb. 16, 1978. This was six years after Kerry's six-year (1966-1972) commitment to the Navy ended. The anti-war detractor of our military did not re-up for another six-year term in 1972, so why the delay of his discharge? The only logical conclusion is that the 1978 honorable discharge was a second discharge given to replace an earlier undesirable discharge under less-than-honorable conditions, as unfit for military service.
I was a colonel assigned as Director of Operations of Headquarters, Texas Air National Guard when George W. Bush was a lieutenant in the Air Guard. Since 1999, I have been besieged by the media, from the London Guardian to CBS's Sixty Minutes, NBC, the Boston Globe, and others, with allegations and questions about Lt. Bush's service in and discharge from the Texas Air National Guard and USAF. I recently appeared on Fox & Friends twice to shoot down CBS's phony memos about Lt. Bush and allegations about his discharge. In the interest of fairness and equal time, it is time scrutiny of John Kerry's discharge(s) is demanded.
The Navy is stonewalling Freedom of Information Act requests by Judicial Watch for the rest of Kerry's records – not surprising, because ever since the Tailhook flap, the Navy has had a P.C. virus. Feminist Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-CO) figuratively castrated the Navy's top brass, and the Navy cringed from political correctness. Pressure and morale at the top was so low that the Chief of Naval Operations committed suicide. The Navy doesn't want to admit it succumbed to political pressure to restore honors stripped from a discredited turncoat. In hiding the truth, the Navy Department dishonors even the lowest-ranking sailor who ever swabbed a deck.
Senator Kerry has said that his medal certificates were reissued because he lost them (and his dog ate his homework, I suppose). Rewards are certified in one's permanent personnel record jacket. If you lose a medal, you can get a replacement medal if your records show the award. The only way awards would have to be reissued is if they were rescinded and deleted from your records. And this narrows the possibilities down to a dishonorable discharge or an undesirable discharge. As Mr. Lipscomb noted, "There is one odd coincidence that gives some weight to the possibility that Mr. Kerry was dishonorably discharged. … (W)hen a dishonorable discharge is issued, all pay benefits, and allowances, and all medals and honors are revoked as well. And five months after Mr. Kerry joined the U.S. Senate in 1985, on one single day, June 4, all of Mr. Kerry's medals were reissued." Military sources tell me that an undesirable discharge under other-than-honorable conditions would also result in a loss of benefits and awards. Kerry could have received a dishonorable discharge, but that would have required a court martial and a felony conviction that might be harder to conceal, so the undesirable discharge is more likely.
The experience of my thirty-plus years in the Navy, U.S. Air Force, and Air National Guard tells me that the late-issued honorable discharge was obviously a cover-up whitewash. Ditto for the re-issuance of Kerry's medals shortly after he became a member of the "ol' boys club" in the Senate.
One of the top dogs in that club, Sen. John Warner, has amnesia about "any representation" about Kerry receiving a less than honorable discharge, even though he was Nixon's Secretary of the Navy when Kerry delivered his diatribe against the Navy and other services in the Senate in April, 1971. In May of 1970, Kerry conferred with the Viet Cong in Paris, and in July of 1971, he demonstrated in Washington to sell their peace proposal – while he was in the Naval Reserve. This variety of amnesia is common among Republicans asked to stand up and testify to Democrat crimes and injustices (see the GOP Senators' "support" of the House impeachment prosecutors).
The Nixon/Ford presidency gave way to Democrat President Jimmy Carter in 1977, which tends to explain the six-year delay in getting the revised discharge. Mr. Lipscomb adds some insight:
"Mr. Carter's first act as president was a general amnesty for draft dodgers and other war protesters. Less than an hour after his inauguration on January 21, 1977, while still in the Capitol building, Mr. Carter signed Executive Order 4483 empowering it. By the time it became a directive from the Defense Department in March 1977 it had been expanded to include other offenders who may have had general, bad conduct, dishonorable discharges, and any other discharge or sentence with negative effect on military records. In those cases the directive outlined a procedure for appeal on a case by case basis before a board of officers. A satisfactory appeal would result in an improvement of discharge status or an honorable discharge."
A document on Kerry's website is a form letter from W. Graham Claytor, Carter's Secretary of the Navy, which grants his Honorable Discharge.
Secretary Claytor's letter says that this action to award an Honorable Discharge Certificate is taken in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, Sections 1162 and 1163, which deal with grounds for involuntary separation of a reserve officer and provide for the action of "a board of officers" to examine an officer's records and review previous actions. Obviously, this was the aforementioned board for appeal resulting from President Carter's executive order. Unless Lt. Kerry had previously received an undesirable discharge, he had nothing to appeal and would not have come before this board.
When he became a Senator in 1985, his clout as a senator got his medals back, even though Reagan was president, but the restoration of the medals was one more piece of evidence, as Mr. Lipscomb noted, that Kerry's previous discharge was not honorable.
A man who evidently has been found unfit for military service could become Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. It is time for the facts hidden in his records to be disclosed.
Earl Lively is a former colonel who was assigned as Director of Operations of Headquarters, Texas Air National Guard when George W. Bush was a lieutenant in the Air Guard.
I sent an email a few days ago to brokaw at nbc asking him why the MSM has refused to both investigate and report on the descrepency.
If this had any validity whatsoever, I would have thought FNC would have picked it up by now, or at the very least Drudge. I would love to believe that this were truly confirmed, but like I said - if Drudge hasn't picked it up yet I am skeptical.
Is this story ready to walk by Monday, or what????????????????????
Col Kerry? When was he ever a "Col"? Last time I checked he only made "Lt".
Amendment 14, Section 3 states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-president, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Uh yeah, great. We've had a whole year to get this stuff out, and it will now be a non-factor, when it could have ended the whole thing, months ago.
THis will be breaking hard!!!!! On Nov 3 that is!
I don't want to throw cold water on this, but officers are discharged very differently than enlisted. When an enlisted person gets out, and once any inactive reserve time is up, they are discharged.
An officer, however, remains an officer for life unless he resigns his commission or gets into trouble. An officer who does not resign (or lose) his commission would never be discharged.
Do you know when Kerry resigned his commission?
ping
Therefore, it's possible he threw his medals away and still has them on....
I hope to God you are right. But, I don't want to get caught accusing Kerry of something that could backfire and hurt us. We cannot be like CBS, after all.
Therefore, we have to consider all of the other possible explanations and make sure none of them are possible. In that spirit.
The discrepancy could be explained, I believe, if Kerry was in the IRR (Independent Ready Reserve). You are only allowed in the IRR after you have fully completed your contract. However, you don't receive a discharge until after you resign from the IRR.
I know because I did something like this myself. After returning from the Gulf War I received a DD-214 and went back to reserve status. However, I had 9.5 years in and for personal reasons I went IRR. I stayed IRR for another 6 years (no drilling) and was then discharged.
The evidence presented clearly indicates that it is LIKELY that Kerry got an "Other Than Honorable" discharge. However, we need concrete proof. This is not it, unfortunately.
That discrepancy was discussed here on FR shortly after Kerry put his "records" on his website.
I just love how the media "discovers" these nuggets then heartily pats themselves on the back.
CSpan Video (RealMedia or Alternate player required.)
Excerpts:
"We're talking to former Lt. John Kerry."
"Was there ever any question about you being dishonorably discharged?"
"Oh no, no, that has never been questioned."
Former Lt. John Kerry, let it sink in a bit, this was in November of 1971.
Yup, all you have to do is read backwards...start from what the Navy said when he was redischarged/pardoned by Carter. Reading between the lines you can't miss the obvious. His medals were reissued. Why? Because he'd been stripped of them six years earlier...or seven, but who's counting. The Navy has strict guidelines for stripping medals, so Kerry's problem should be right there in front of God and all the voters.
Spread the word on the internet!
Post on internet boards AND e-mails!
The whole 42:09 Stolen Honor online FREE right now! E-mail it NOW!
Stolen Honor nails Kerry and the VVAW
and how they lied at Winter Soldier.
And how Kerry lied to the US Senate in 1971
And how Kerry and his pack of liars caused our POW's to suffer!
Kerry and the DNC cannot stop
EVERYONE on the internet from seeing this!
http://stolenhonor.com/documentary/watch-video.asp
E-mail the FREE xxcerpts clips to everyone NOW!
http://stolenhonor.com/documentary/program-excerpts.asp
LATEST SWIFT BOAT VETS AD!
http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfittolead.html
Swift Vets and POW's
We Have Questions
Free Videos!
http://www.swiftvetsandpows.com/
Hanoi Approved of Role Played By Kerry and VVAW
http://www.nysun.com/article/3756
Timeline of John Kerry
http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html
Click Here for
All the Latest Swift Boat Vets Ad!
http://www.swiftvets.com/
Click Here for
All the Swift Boat Vets Ads!
View for FREE!
http://www2.swiftvets.com/index.php?topic=Ads
Free online version of
John Kerry and the VVAW
"The New Soldier"
Banned by the DNC!
You can read it online right now.
http://ejsmithweb.com/fr/newsoldier/
The Swiftvets news conference on C-SPAN can be found here.
AND other valuable Video and Audio links.
http://www.peteandrews.net/media.htm
John Kerry's Discharge
He won't sign Form 180
What is he hiding?
Kerry's Dishonorable Discharge?
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41200
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/blog-buzzcut.php?range=10%2F24%2F2004+-+10%2F30%2F2004
The Children of Viet Nam Veterans Video (Not an easy one to watch)
Please remember the 58,000 + Names on the Wall on Nov 2
Please watch this video
Thank You
http://kerrylied.com/otherdocs/flash.htm
Tick, Tick, Tick, Tick
Why is just the cover letter to his honorable discharge on his website and NOT THE ACTUAL DISCHARGE?
The obvious problem with this story: If Kerry was such a hot item back then, and if he was high on Nixon's enemies list, then someone in the Nixon Administration would surely have known about such a discharge.
Or was this supposed to have happened during Ford? Even then, you'd think someone would have known about it.
It's NOT EO 4483....It's Presidential Proclimation 4483. http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/codification/proclamations/04483.html
It's EO 11967. http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/executive_orders/1977_carter.html
If a simple thing like this can't be properly researched, who is going to take anything at face value.
Dot the i's and cross the t's.
bttt