Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll Show David Vitter Closer To Majority In LA Senate Race
LA Politics ^ | October 29, 2004

Posted on 10/29/2004 3:02:49 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

Latest Verne Kennedy shows Vitter averaging 49% over three-day period. The same firm also shows state Sen. Craig Romero edging ahead of Billy Tauzin III with Charles Melconan a distant third in House District 3, making an all-Republican runoff very possible.


TOPICS: Announcements; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: houseelections2004; kewl; louisiana; polls; senateelections2004; vitter

1 posted on 10/29/2004 3:02:51 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

An all-Republican runoff in the district represented by Billy Tauzin and once represented by David Treen will be a real surprise, but it could happen. Apparently, the problem for the Democrats there is that Chris John is not catching on as the much revered John Breaux assumed that he would, and this is dragging down popular Democrat contenders in other races.


2 posted on 10/29/2004 3:05:11 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; Kuksool; zbigreddogz; ken5050; California Patriot; ...

LOUISIANA PING!


3 posted on 10/29/2004 3:07:46 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Thanks for the info.


4 posted on 10/29/2004 3:15:05 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
And for more good news, the Murkowski campaign in Alaska today released a Moore of Portland, Oregon, poll today showing Senator Lisa Murkowski shooting out to a 51% to 40% lead over former Democratic Governor Tony Knowles.
5 posted on 10/29/2004 3:19:49 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swampmarine

That's a surprise. I thought Knowles would win. He is a fraternity brother of Bush's. Why is Knowles losing?


6 posted on 10/29/2004 3:28:16 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Is this for true? ;-)


7 posted on 10/29/2004 3:31:02 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
If the poll is to believed, it's because Murkowski, using Senator Ted Stevens and Congressman Don Young, has successfully convinced a majority of Alaskans that they are better served with her in D.C. supporting President Bush and, perhaps more importantly, maintaining Senator Steven's majority position in the US Senate.
8 posted on 10/29/2004 3:35:20 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Why is Knowles losing?

Because he chose to run on the ticket headed by Kerry.

9 posted on 10/29/2004 3:36:27 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Swampmarine

There is a God in heaven and he smiles upon us!


10 posted on 10/29/2004 3:39:11 PM PDT by standupfortruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Because he's a liberal Democrat running for the Senate from Alaska, that's why. Maybe the Moore Information poll is wrong and the election will be as close as the prior polls had shown, but I've been saying for a year now that Lisa Murkowski will end up beating Knowles by over 5% in spite of the nepotism issue because she's a Republican running for the U.S. Senate in Alaska. I hope my confidence was well placed.


11 posted on 10/29/2004 3:39:21 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Knowles is losing this time becaues he doesn't have a conservative third-party candidate to siphon votes away from the Republican. Frankly, I'm not sure I believe those poll results. I think that Murkowski is ahead but not by that margin.


12 posted on 10/29/2004 3:44:48 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Amen.


13 posted on 10/29/2004 3:46:15 PM PDT by Swampmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I believe part of the reason John is not catching on is because John Kennedy is splitting the Democratic vote and is confusing Democrats as to who to vote for. Both of them are trying to link the other to David Duke while Vitter continues to pile on poll numbers. Vitter could well take 50% this Tuesday.


14 posted on 10/29/2004 9:22:44 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Go to http://vitterblog.blogspot.com and follow the Louisiana senate race. Geaux Vitter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

Only LA Democrats could be confused between two of their own candidates and David Duke, who has not sought any office in six years.


15 posted on 10/29/2004 9:28:31 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think it's "Melancon," and he is a former aide to the popular former Sen. J. Bennett Johnston, Jr., who has given the maximum $2,000 contribution to John F. Kerry, well before Kerry became the party nominee.

Though LA voters thought that Johnston was a "conservative," he actually was voted in 1984 as the "biggest spender" in Congress. His friend John Kerry later took that title from J. Bennett Johnston, Jr. J. Bennett Johnston, Jr., was descended from the Long family of politics and never met pork-barrel spending in Louisiana at least that he did not embrace.


16 posted on 10/29/2004 9:36:11 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
I'd love to see Craig Romero win the third district seat. I'd really love to see David Vitter win on November 2. I spent tonight holding a sign for David Vitter on the main street in Gonzales. Many people honked and waved for us.

Bill

17 posted on 10/29/2004 9:56:35 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Vitter, Jindal BUMP!!! And a GO DUBYA BUMP TO BOOT!!!


18 posted on 10/30/2004 12:35:43 AM PDT by cpforlife.org (Birth is one day in the life of a person who is already nine months old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief

Vitter needs 50% on Teusday. I don't think he'll win a runoff.


19 posted on 11/01/2004 10:05:58 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

I disagree that he can't win a runoff, but I heard this morning that a Verne Kennedy poll has Vitter at 49%, so it's looking like our worries may be for nothing.


20 posted on 11/01/2004 12:47:06 PM PST by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Go to http://vitterblog.blogspot.com and follow the Louisiana senate race. Geaux Vitter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson