Posted on 10/28/2004 3:50:44 PM PDT by Destro
Just reported on NBC News
I'll be the first to say it (heck, I'm a woman so I can get away with it): This broad is a cheap hustler and her dimestore lawyer is too. While O'Reilly may have engaged in sleazy behavior, their countersuit must have scared this floozy big time. After all, she appears to have a longer sleaze "history" than Bill - and she's had fewer years to amass her record. Must be lots of stuff she didn't want to come out about her past and present.
Oh yeah, and all that "offense" for being sexually harrassed on the job - a very nice performance before the cameras. Clearly, she didn't put her foot into this with planning and effort, without realizing her schemes would come to light. She's too much of a hussy to be "offended" about sex talk.
I'm not a Factor fan and don't watch his show, but I did see enough of this golddigger on TV to see right through her.....and her shyster.
Thank you for clarifying with some detail.
Take a look at this thread -- just the keywords alone make it worthwhile! ;D
Although I am not a fan of O'reilly's, as a woman, I detest the way these women get by with trashing men. It's a plague on all of us and just mkes us look weak. The girl was just out for money. She was never "offended".
Of course, that said, "guys, stop being so dumb"!
Pithy.
Yeah, Bill O'Reilly really transends the ick factor.
If you believe that I have a deal for you!
*LOL* No offense intended. It was primarily in response to #47. Just thought I'd tag you on since you posted to me at #54. :-)
Think O.J.
izzatzo!
I just mailed $100 to FR per the terms of the wager.
It's like watching a train wreck. Even on his radio show, he stopped all his sex talk.
Hi, there annie... long time without chatting with you... Just letting you know that I appreciate your take (as "a woman"... LOL) about this story since I have not followed it too closely at all, and I value your opinions. I suspect you're right aobut her being a "golddigger" and for the life of me, I will never be able to understand how somebody can "force" another human being "to have phone sex". Sorry. I suspect her case was about as strong as a piece of well cooked noodle.
My bro-in-law must have had your partner. Being an oncologist who was named as co-defendent simply because he referred a patient to a more qualified doctor, he was sued also@!
After being begged by your partner to just settle, there was a final meeting in judges chambers whereby the judge asked him to just settle and let the insurance company pay and he basically said F-you!
They then went back out to the court room, my bro-in-laws atty says they are not giving in and the suing bastards gave in and dropped the case against him!
At what cost to him and his insurance company for the legal representation?
You and your ilk have successfully built an industry requiring your services, both pro and con. For that fact, I will forever despise you and all your legal bretheren! You are nothing more than the leaches on the most basic common denominator of a greedy society..........
Fabulous keywords!
And O'Reilly is now a MAJOR I-don't-wanna-look-at-him turnoff.
The only reason Hannity and Colmes doesn't overtake O'Reilly is because of Colmes. If they get rid of Colmes, I bet the ratings would soar. Now O"Reilly can peacefully go back to his middle of the road, I want to be accepted by Dan Rather self and smirk in our faces. He asked his audience not to believe allegations, but why did he settle if there was nothing to it? Were those tapes so BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDD? Don't want to hear anyone climaxing over the phone. Yuck.
Sorry. I was trying to respond to RWRbestbyfar's post. Ugh, duh, gee wizz, well thanks for having a sense of humor, I'm new here and still learning the ropes, like trying to be careful and not too quick on the keyboard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.