Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Reported Suspicious Powder At Al Qaqaa In April 2003 (CBS Blows It Again)
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/ ^ | 10/26/2004 | Captain Ed

Posted on 10/26/2004 9:12:27 PM PDT by conservativepoet

CBS Reported Suspicious Powder At Al Qaqaa In April 2003 (CBS Blows It Again)

Alert CQ reader Samuel Silver sent me this article from the archives of CBS News -- the same organization that helped prepped NYTrogate with the New York Times -- which shows that the Third Infantry Division had reached Al Qaqaa and discovered thousands of vials of a mysterious powdered explosive by April 3, 2003 (coincidentally, my birthday):

U.S. troops found thousands of boxes of white powder, nerve agent antidote and Arabic documents on how to engage in chemical warfare at an industrial site south of Baghdad. But a senior U.S. official familiar with initial testing said the materials were believed to be explosives. Col. John Peabody, engineer brigade commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, said the materials were found Friday at the Latifiyah industrial complex just south of Baghdad. ... The facility is part of a larger complex known as the Latifiyah Explosives and Ammunition Plant al Qa Qaa [emph mine -- CE].

Troops of the 3ID discovered thousands of boxes, each with three vials of white powder, the form in which the explosive agents that the IAEA claim went missing were stored. From this description, it sounds as if the material left at Al Qaqaa would have only been samples or starter materials, as storing 380 tons of powdered explosive in vials would have taken most of Baghdad to store.

Nevertheless, the contemporaneous CBS report showed that the 3ID knew what they had at Al Qaqaa and did more than just a cursory look around the joint to go sightseeing. They suspected that the facility held WMD or chemical-weapons manufacturing capability. A bottle labeled "tabun," a nerve agent, was found with a small amount of the chemical inside. The troops also discovered atropine stored at the bunker, an antidote for nerve agents, making them very suspicious of the shells stored at Al Qaqaa.

With all of the pressure on the Bush administration to find WMD, does anyone seriously think for a moment that they left Al Qaqaa without checking for UNSCOM and/or IAEA seals? From the description that CBS gave at the time, the Army took a very close look at the materiel at Al Qaqaa:

The senior U.S. official, based in Washington and speaking on condition of anonymity, said the material was under further study. The site is enormous and U.S. troops are still investigating it for potential weapons of mass destruction, the official said. "Initial reports are that the material is probably just explosives, but we're still going through the place," the official said. ...

The facility had been identified by the International Atomic Energy Agency as a suspected chemical, biological and nuclear weapons site. U.N. inspectors visited the plant at least nine times, including as recently as Feb. 18.

The idea that various Army units showed up at the weapons facility and strolled around a few minutes before moving up the road to Baghdad, leaving the lights on and the front door unlocked, looks more and more ridiculous. The Army knew very well what it had found, and it searched the bunkers carefully looking for the most dangerous and high-priority items.

Shame on CBS for not even checking its own archives in order to research their hit piece on Bush. Shame also on the NY Times for not reviewing the embeds for the units in the area during the invasion to verify the contemporaneous reporting. Even if one wants to write a hit piece, doing the proper research should be a basic part of the job.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: alqaqaa; ammogate; atropine; cbs; cbsnews; iraq; napalminthemorning; nyslimescbsqaqaagate; nyt; nytrogate; tabun; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2004 9:12:28 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Heh.

Full CBS Story link:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/04/iraq/main547667.shtml


2 posted on 10/26/2004 9:19:49 PM PDT by BurbankErnie (I am an oxymoron - a California Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

first time i saw NYTro Gate, very clever.


3 posted on 10/26/2004 9:21:21 PM PDT by aft_lizard (Actually i voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankErnie

Wow, beat me to it :)


4 posted on 10/26/2004 9:21:32 PM PDT by 7mmMag@LeftCoast ("....to defend the Constitution of the United States, against all enemies, foreign and domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

bttt


5 posted on 10/26/2004 9:21:55 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Betcha Drudge carries this later tonight or tomorrow. Egads, the leftists' wild-eyed plot for an October Surprise is melting like so much goo.


6 posted on 10/26/2004 9:22:20 PM PDT by GeorgeBerryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

7 posted on 10/26/2004 9:25:47 PM PDT by happydogdesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeBerryman

well, they'll say "See, it was there in those boxes. Now it's gone -- obviously Bush's fault"

What are the chances our guys destroyed it at some point?


8 posted on 10/26/2004 9:26:18 PM PDT by Kiss Me Hardy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: happydogdesign

COOL!!!


9 posted on 10/26/2004 9:26:32 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kiss Me Hardy
What are the chances our guys destroyed it at some point?

Once they'd discovered it wasn't a bio or chem weapon? I'd say 99.9999%.
10 posted on 10/26/2004 9:29:03 PM PDT by GeorgeBerryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

.


11 posted on 10/26/2004 9:30:42 PM PDT by Mo1 (This Sept 10th attitude is no way to protect our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Doesn't all of this make you wonder what total crap these "news" organizations have been pushing all these years? They probably wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the fanny.


12 posted on 10/26/2004 9:31:52 PM PDT by elizabetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

This should be sent to Rush and Fox news. Great job by the blogger.


13 posted on 10/26/2004 9:32:34 PM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Some reporter needs to ask if the chemical signatures of the C4 precursors held at Al Qaqaa are on file with the US military.

Some reporter needs to ask if the Al Qaqaa facility was on the IAEA or UN inspectors' lists of known locations holding chem/bio weapons. And follow up with a question if the site was under guard to monitor chem/bio agents still located at the facility.

Why I can't get these answers yet, can be answered by explaining the failure of the media to re-report their own damn stories during the time of invasion and occupation of Iraq.


14 posted on 10/26/2004 9:33:05 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

ping


15 posted on 10/26/2004 9:33:26 PM PDT by icecold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeBerryman

"Egads, the leftists' wild-eyed plot for an October Surprise is melting like so much goo."
Yes. But the harms already done. To many people heard the CBS report, and have heard the hundreds of replays of the Lurch castigating GWB on this issue. That is all Lurch wanted to do. Plant the seeds of doubt, and then force GWB
to counter. Meanwhile all those millions of folks watching the original TV reports, and Lurches venom, now have it planted in their head that our military, therefore GWB, and Rummy etc., are at fault.

This is the problem all along. Lurch speaks, those that do not know the facts on given issue, think he may be right, then switch there channels to some stupid show and break out the fatty salty treats.
This is the has keeped the demos alive all these years.


16 posted on 10/26/2004 9:33:49 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet
I just watched Lou Dobbs on CNN. He had a weapons' inspector, a pentagon CNN official reporter, and others that he made sound important on his show. The question "why these weapons were allowed to stay in Iraq since 1992 and 93 when the UN found them," came up several times. They all blamed Bush. Said bad news for Bush. Their poll came up 77% saying this was an issue that would be okay being brought up one day before the election.
Questions that didn't come up:

1) Was Bush correct when saying Iraq had weapons of mass destruction now that we know Iraq did have them for a fact?

2) Why is Bush being blamed for weapons that disappeared before or during the time we went in? Is it not a good idea that we went in Iraq since the UN weapon inspectors and the Clinton administration found weapons and let Saddam keep them?

3) If there are so many questions still unanswered, why would Kerry use this information against Bush when there is every reason to blame the UN inspectors and the Clinton administration for the policy of "do nothing"?
Which seems to be Kerry's position with Iraq also?

4)If Clinton allowed these weapons to remain in Iraq, and the "insurgent murderers" are using these same weapons to kill our soldiers, shouldn't Clinton be held accountable?

ps: O'Reilly did not want the complete truth on this issue to come out tonight, why? Did O'Reilly stick up for Dan rather again? Is that what I saw?
17 posted on 10/26/2004 9:33:51 PM PDT by lyingisbetter ("Let's wait Kerry or let's go Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet
The facility is part of a larger complex known as the (Queen) Latifiyah Explosives and Ammunition Plant al Qa Qaa
18 posted on 10/26/2004 9:34:21 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery interesting and yet another nail in the coffin of this story.


19 posted on 10/26/2004 9:36:04 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

I agree.


20 posted on 10/26/2004 9:36:47 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson