"The plain unvarnished facts totally ignored. I guess the New York Times is "always right" and all us "sane" people who can add two plus two equals four are always wrong.
The Republican National Committee released a compilation of recent news reports on the missing explosives Tuesday, which it said proved that the Times and Kerry campaign were ignoring the facts to attack Bush."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: focusandclarity
1. Beacon Hill, MA
2. Nantucket, MA
3. Pittsburgh, PA
4. MSM
5. Ketchum, ID
6. Georgetown, DC
Kerry actually owns Six Estates, not five. Everyone keeps forgetting that the FOURTH ESTATE is just like home sweet home.
41 posted on
10/26/2004 5:37:43 PM PDT by
Shqipo
(The gloves are on and the corners are empty.)
To: focusandclarity
The New York Times is finally admitting that the WMD's were there and are missing. Chalk one up for Dubya.
42 posted on
10/26/2004 5:40:23 PM PDT by
chainsaw
(Kerry is a coward and a traitor and will not sign a SF 180.)
To: focusandclarity
"The IAEA took an inventory of the materials in January, 2003. In early March, right before the beginning of the war, the IAEA went to the site and found that the seals on the bunkers were still intact. Did the UN Doofus's put seals on the doors to the tunnels interconnecting the bunkers??
47 posted on
10/26/2004 5:48:12 PM PDT by
HP8753
(Bypass Online News Sites Registration>>>> www.bugmenot.com)
To: focusandclarity
Pay no attention to that old, gray lady behind the curtain.
To: focusandclarity
Don't forget the story behind the story: the journalist sleazebags at SeeBS wanted to put that story up on SUNDAY night, on the eve of the election, when the truth would not have time to come out or be disseminated.
52 posted on
10/26/2004 6:00:29 PM PDT by
SpinyNorman
(The Grey Lady is a liberal prostitute. Kerry gets it for free.....)
To: focusandclarity
"Our front page story of October 25 reported accurately that a senior official at Iraq's Ministry of Science & Technology informed the International Atomic Energy Agency in a letter on October 10 that the materials were lost from the Al-qaqaa site after April 9, 2003, through the theft and looting of the governmental installations due to lack of security."
The IAEA wasn't there and have no idea when the materials were lost, stolen or given to Syria by Saddam.
And waiting to post that report until the week before the election has a particular stench about it, faintly French.....
54 posted on
10/26/2004 6:03:27 PM PDT by
SpinyNorman
(The Grey Lady is a liberal prostitute. Kerry gets it for free.....)
To: nutmeg
55 posted on
10/26/2004 6:05:00 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: focusandclarity
The NYT seldom tells the truth when it comes to politics.
To: focusandclarity
New York Times: "All the news that fits, we print."
62 posted on
10/26/2004 6:22:06 PM PDT by
JoeGar
To: focusandclarity
You were had Ted N.Y. Times.
64 posted on
10/26/2004 6:29:51 PM PDT by
bayourod
(Old Media news is poll driven, not event driven, not fact driven, not newsworthy driven.)
To: focusandclarity
The NBC Nightly News revealed Monday evening that it had an embedded reporter at Al Qaqaa on April 10, 2003, one day after the fall of Baghdad, and that none of the 380 tons of explosives were present. "NBC News was embedded with troops from the Army's 101st Airborne as they temporarily take over the Al-Qaqaa weapons installation south of Baghdad," Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski reported Monday. "But these troops never found the nearly 380 tons of some of the most powerful conventional explosives, called HMX and RDX, which is now missing."
What part of NBC's report don't those syphilitic editors of the NYT understand? The explosives were not there to be guarded when our troops got there. When the NYT says the weapons disappeared "sometime" before April 9, does that leave open the possibility "sometime" means days, weeks, hours, or minutes?
67 posted on
10/26/2004 6:38:48 PM PDT by
Auntie Dem
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
To: focusandclarity
NYT = Nasty Yellow Turd
68 posted on
10/26/2004 6:47:20 PM PDT by
fightu4it
(conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
To: focusandclarity
"The IAEA took an inventory of the materials in January, 2003. In early March, right before the beginning of the war, the IAEA went to the site and found that the seals on the bunkers were still intact. So let me get this straight. The only FACTS they KNOW are:
- The stuff was inventoried in January
- In EARLY March, the seals appeared intact
- The Americans did not arrive on scene until around April 9
From this they ASSUME that the explosives were taken after our troops arrived, rather than in the intervening MONTH between the March inspection and our April arrival, when Sadaam's regime was intensely preparing caches of arms and explosives for a post-invasion guerilla war
Or, indeed, possibly before March, thru a hidden tunnel that would have bypassed the sealed door
And, obviously, it's all Bush's fault
69 posted on
10/26/2004 6:47:41 PM PDT by
SauronOfMordor
(What Is Best In Life? To crush your enemies and see them driven before you)
To: focusandclarity
"Pentagon and White House officials told the Times, as the story says, that the materials vanished sometime after the U.S.-led invasion.Manure.
72 posted on
10/26/2004 7:07:38 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: focusandclarity
NYT is the buffoon of newspapers. Shilling and lying are no way to operate a media outlet. WRITE them!
73 posted on
10/26/2004 7:14:57 PM PDT by
manic4organic
(Kerry/Edwards - Both ends of the horse)
To: focusandclarity
See BS also gave them the "play book" for discredited stories.
76 posted on
10/26/2004 7:30:18 PM PDT by
Henchman
(Who gave KERRY entré to the VC @ Paris? T.Kennedy? McGovern? ...some"high" low D'rat probably)
To: focusandclarity
Is the NYT morphing into the Guardian, or is the Guardian morphing into the NYT? Too philosophical for me...
5.56mm
77 posted on
10/26/2004 7:31:15 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: focusandclarity
They probably figure with only a week left they can beat this one into the ground because after election day it is a non story. The only gain that can come from this is after this election the majority of people will finally see how blantantly biased the MSM is.
78 posted on
10/26/2004 7:34:57 PM PDT by
Sparky760
(The sleeping Giant has been awakened)
To: focusandclarity
Damn the torpedoes full speed ahead !!
The Ghost of Dan Rather Rides Again......
82 posted on
10/26/2004 10:54:08 PM PDT by
festus
(All Your Electoral Votes Are Belong To Us !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson