[focusandclarity]

"The plain unvarnished facts totally ignored. I guess the New York Times is "always right" and all us "sane" people who can add two plus two equals four are always wrong.

The Republican National Committee released a compilation of recent news reports on the missing explosives Tuesday, which it said proved that the Times and Kerry campaign were ignoring the facts to attack Bush."

[Shqipo]

1. Beacon Hill, MA
2. Nantucket, MA
3. Pittsburgh, PA
4. MSM
5. Ketchum, ID
6. Georgetown, DC

Kerry actually owns Six Estates, not five. Everyone keeps forgetting that the FOURTH ESTATE is just like home sweet home.

[chainsaw]

The New York Times is finally admitting that the WMD's were there and are missing. Chalk one up for Dubya.

[HP8753]

"The IAEA took an inventory of the materials in January, 2003. In early March, right before the beginning of the war, the IAEA went to the site and found that the seals on the bunkers were still intact.

Did the UN Doofus's put seals on the doors to the tunnels interconnecting the bunkers??

[Fester Chugabrew]

Pay no attention to that old, gray lady behind the curtain.

[SpinyNorman]

Don't forget the story behind the story: the journalist sleazebags at SeeBS wanted to put that story up on SUNDAY night, on the eve of the election, when the truth would not have time to come out or be disseminated.

[SpinyNorman]

"Our front page story of October 25 reported accurately that a senior official at Iraq's Ministry of Science & Technology informed the International Atomic Energy Agency in a letter on October 10 that the materials were lost from the Al-qaqaa site after April 9, 2003, through the theft and looting of the governmental installations due to lack of security."

The IAEA wasn't there and have no idea when the materials were lost, stolen or given to Syria by Saddam.

And waiting to post that report until the week before the election has a particular stench about it, faintly French.....

[nutmeg]

bttt

[Brilliant]

The NYT seldom tells the truth when it comes to politics.

[JoeGar]

New York Times: "All the news that fits, we print."

[bayourod]

You were had Ted N.Y. Times.

[Auntie Dem]

The NBC Nightly News revealed Monday evening that it had an embedded reporter at Al Qaqaa on April 10, 2003, one day after the fall of Baghdad, and that none of the 380 tons of explosives were present.

"NBC News was embedded with troops from the Army's 101st Airborne as they temporarily take over the Al-Qaqaa weapons installation south of Baghdad," Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski reported Monday. "But these troops never found the nearly 380 tons of some of the most powerful conventional explosives, called HMX and RDX, which is now missing."

What part of NBC's report don't those syphilitic editors of the NYT understand? The explosives were not there to be guarded when our troops got there. When the NYT says the weapons disappeared "sometime" before April 9, does that leave open the possibility "sometime" means days, weeks, hours, or minutes?

[fightu4it]

NYT = Nasty Yellow Turd

[SauronOfMordor]

"The IAEA took an inventory of the materials in January, 2003. In early March, right before the beginning of the war, the IAEA went to the site and found that the seals on the bunkers were still intact.

So let me get this straight. The only FACTS they KNOW are:

1. The stuff was inventoried in January
2. In EARLY March, the seals appeared intact
3. The Americans did not arrive on scene until around April 9

From this they ASSUME that the explosives were taken after our troops arrived, rather than in the intervening MONTH between the March inspection and our April arrival, when Sadaam's regime was intensely preparing caches of arms and explosives for a post-invasion guerilla war

Or, indeed, possibly before March, thru a hidden tunnel that would have bypassed the sealed door

And, obviously, it's all Bush's fault

[facedown]

"Pentagon and White House officials told the Times, as the story says, that the materials vanished sometime after the U.S.-led invasion.

Manure.

[manic4organic]

NYT is the buffoon of newspapers. Shilling and lying are no way to operate a media outlet. WRITE them!

[Henchman]

See BS also gave them the "play book" for discredited stories.

[M Kehoe]

Is the NYT morphing into the Guardian, or is the Guardian morphing into the NYT? Too philosophical for me...

5.56mm

[Sparky760]

They probably figure with only a week left they can beat this one into the ground because after election day it is a non story. The only gain that can come from this is after this election the majority of people will finally see how blantantly biased the MSM is.

[festus]

Damn the torpedoes full speed ahead !!

The Ghost of Dan Rather Rides Again......