Posted on 10/26/2004 11:15:34 AM PDT by RWR8189
The best of all possible worlds on Nov. 3: Bush/CHeney win a landslide; Daschle loses; The NYT and CBS are thoroughly discredited by their blatant partisanship; and Zogby has to find legitimate employment.
That's what I'm hoping for. A few dems around here I think have come to that realization before getting to the booth. But they hate to admit it. So maybe they are telling the pollsters what they think they want to happen, but know it won't.
Bush is the challenger...everyone knows that Gore won the last election....right?
Makes sense. I've read a number of people theorize that many watched the debates not so much to gauge John Kerry but to reassess George Bush.
His ability to, overall, do well in the debates *and* talk about a forward-looking agenda served him well, mainly by allowing undecideds to feel "comfortable" with re-electing him.
Works for me.
The best of all possible worlds on Nov. 3: Bush/CHeney win a landslide; Daschle loses; The NYT and CBS are thoroughly discredited by their blatant partisanship; and Zogby has to find legitimate employment.
Go W!
Remember John Zogby is a Democrat hack. His brother was (and I think still is) working for the DNC. His polls are garbage up until the eve of the election (that is when you pay attention).
I believe he was closest during the 2000 election because he knew (from his brother) the amount of vote fraud the Dems would have.
Wait until its all over. It will be 2 to 1 by then.
Considering the accuracy of most polls, I am prepared to say you are within the margin of error at 57% to 38% (versus 60 to 30).
I tend to believe Dick Morris, who says this could be an extremely high turnout year, and pollsters are just guessing about who will vote and who won't.
Pray for W and Our Troops
lastnight on Greta, Jerry Falwell said that for the last six months, he's been involved in voter registration at over 1,000 (or did he say 2,000) churches... this is not something that has been talked about in the news... it's only the Dem voter registration that they are talking about... wasn't Dr. Dobson doing the same? Jerry Falwell believes the Christian vote is going to turn out even stronger than in 1994... it was not strong in 2000... i believe this is what the media is missing...
Can you cite a previous example of the total number of voters jumping by 10-15%?
Year Turnout
1924 48.9%
1928 51.8%
1932 52.6%
1936 56.8%
1940 58.8%
1944 56.1%
1948 51.1%
1952 61.6%
1956 59.4%
1960 62.8%
1964 61.9%
1968 60.9%
1972 55.2%
1976 53.5%
1980 52.6%
1984 53.1%
1988 50.1%
1992 55.2%
1996 49.0%
2000 51.0%
1952? Stevenson vs IKE?
Good call. 1920 is another example. But 1952 followed two years 1944 and 1948 with low turnout. Kind of similar to 1992 following the absolute drop in voters in 1988.
However, in 2000, the number of voters went up 9 million from 1996, a nearly 9% increase, after the drop from 1992 to 1996. Its hard to believe we will now see 16 million new voters on top of that like some are saying.
I'm betting on 110 million.
BTW, do you think Illinois is any better on the ground than the 8% deficit in the last poll?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.