Skip to comments.
Late Deciding Voters Prefer Bush (71% Decided Before Fall Campaign)
Rasmussen Reports ^
| October 26, 2004
Posted on 10/26/2004 11:15:34 AM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: RWR8189
If we had a Senate candidate that had a serious chance to win we might have made it a good race in IL. Seems we never really had one --especially the way Ba-rock-star has been hyped. I seriously doubt the Trib reporters even needed to dig into anyone's divoces....
I think the turnout will surprise you, though.
41
posted on
10/26/2004 2:05:37 PM PDT
by
unspun
(RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
To: b4its2late
Not according to John Zogby who was on with Sean Hannity yesterday. He said the opposite. Out of curiousity, did he say so generally, or were his remarks specific to a study of this election season?
42
posted on
10/26/2004 3:01:04 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: truthandlife
I believe he was closest during the 2000 election because he knew (from his brother) the amount of vote fraud the Dems would have. Or by chance. His state-by-state- results were all over the place. Only his aggregate was accurate.
43
posted on
10/26/2004 3:05:42 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: js1138
pollsters are just guessing about who will vote and who won't. This is clearly correct. Even those who end up right, will likely have done so at least partly by accident - multiple errors in differing directions happening to hit the right number.
44
posted on
10/26/2004 3:07:36 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: RightthinkinAmerican
thought he said that USUALLY the late voters go for the challenger, but this election may be different. I may have heard wrong, but that's the way I thought he put
That applies to Congressional and local races. The President race usually goes the other way. Late Decider's tend to stick with what they know rather then chance an unknown.
45
posted on
10/26/2004 3:27:26 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
To: hsmomx3
was channel surfing this morning only to hear Timmy Russert telling Katie that of all those who just registered to vote 50% favored Kerry to 19% who said they would vote for Bush. He went on to say that this was not good news for the President.
There is NO way for Russert to know this. I think you must of mis-heard him.
46
posted on
10/26/2004 3:30:50 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
To: b4its2late
President's numbers not good for incumbent.Oh I don't know about that. Reagan won in 1980 with only 51.6%, Clinton's re-election in 1996 was won with only 49.9%. I think Bush's numbers look good. An axe murderer running as a dim would garner at least 40% - 45%.
To: dc-zoo
Paula Zahn was trying to talk two undecided from Bush to Kerry last night on her show -- not much luck!
To: lepton
Hey lep.
Personally, they sounded general, the basic CYA mode. Though he made it a point to say that for an incumbent President, the numbers weren't good. I'm taking it all with a grain of salt....
49
posted on
10/26/2004 7:26:34 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson