Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has Kerry Lied about Annulment, Too?
WorldNetDaily ^ | April 10, 2004 | Les Kinsolving

Posted on 10/26/2004 7:53:41 AM PDT by CitizenM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: CitizenM

I thought there was an article here on FR (Coulter?) that said for sure that he did NOT get an annulment.

Anyone else remember?


41 posted on 10/26/2004 10:16:50 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

This is another case of two sets of rules. One for Dems, One for Repubs.

How many threads on Freepers have this theme. I would bet 90%. It is like we wake up everyday and post, "May God the Sky is Blue. It is Blue and the dems say it is Green. It is not green, it is blue." There IS media bias and we are living with Big Brother everyday, everywhere.

The sooner we all quite exclaiming, "There is Media Bias" and move to step number two. "The Media say the skyiis green, but it is blue therefore I am going to stop watching, buying or giving them any FINANCIAL and viewer support. Not only am I going to do it but I am going to join a national boycott to cut them off from my POCKETBOOK and my cable rating drain on the wires they use for ratings."

People I know Bush will be reelected with the grace of God and turnout but before 2008 we need to balance the media playing field or we will have Hillary in White House, Teddy in the UN and Bill on the Supreme Court.

Think it can't happen?


42 posted on 10/26/2004 10:21:52 AM PDT by TurtleStink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I'm a Bible based Christian and there is NO allowance for an "annulment" but divorce is permitted under certain situations. An "annulment" is not Biblical.

It's about as Biblical as it possibly could be. In fact, in the Gospel of Matthew, Christ specifically recognizes the case where a marriage may appear to exist but not exist in truth when he says that divorce is prohibited "except for porneia". "Porneia" means, not adultery ("adultery" in Greek is "moicheia"), but unchastity; an irregular or unlawful marriage arrangement, de facto "shacking up".

The term "annullment" is not really correct anyway. The correct term is a "Decree of Nullity"; a formal finding that no real Christian marriage ever existed (though a marriage did exist in civil law).

43 posted on 10/26/2004 10:24:19 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

All very good questions, which need to be directed at Kerry and the Catholic church. The question is who is going to bell the cat? The MSM won't do it.


44 posted on 10/26/2004 10:37:46 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Nice try but annulment is NOT Biblical. What you are referring to is grounds for a divorce.
45 posted on 10/26/2004 3:04:48 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nmh

There's no concept of illegitimate children in the Catholic Church.


46 posted on 10/26/2004 3:09:22 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
When you find something that Kerry hasn't lied about, let me know.
47 posted on 10/26/2004 3:14:16 PM PDT by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W."Billy" Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trepz

Yep, there's intense scrutiny of every facet of Bush's personal and political life, but virtually no examination whatsoever of Kerry's past. Just imagine how the media would run cover for Kerry if he were elected.


48 posted on 10/26/2004 3:15:12 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
"There's no concept of illegitimate children in the Catholic Church."

In the real world there is such a concept.

It's not the fault of the child.

An illegitimate child is one who lacks either a father or a mother. It's an out of wedlock baby. YOu can redefine things till the cows come home but there is such a thing as an illegitimate child.
49 posted on 10/26/2004 3:29:00 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nmh

The word "illegitimate" has to do with law, and whether things are lawful. So in the Church, there is no law about whether children have more or less status depending on whether their parents were married. In other words, the Church renders this unto Caesar, for purposes of inheritance or whatever. And Caesar is happy to oblige.


50 posted on 10/26/2004 3:34:46 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

The civil ceremony would be considered adultery until the first marriage dissolved.

Divorce or annulment is allowed based on abuse, lack of a desire to have children or adultery.
John had children with the other wife, so either she or he had an adulterous affair or was being abusive.

The only scenario I can come up with for annulment would be that when she went off, she physically attacked him and he had it documented and offered that as proof to the church for an annulment.

But he was in a state of adultery with the second woman if the first marriage was not annulled through the church. At least as far as the Catholic Church would be concerned as far as I know.


51 posted on 10/26/2004 3:35:18 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Dear nmh,

"From what I gather from Catholics an annulment wipes out the legitimacy of the marriage and it is 'anulled'. With this view of wiping out the 'marriage' then the children would be ILLegitimate since his first marriage in the Catholic church is not deemed legitimate hence neither would his children be then."

Are you paying attention to any of the folks who have corrected your failed understanding of Catholic teaching? When folks point out that you are wrong, do you even read their helpful comments?

Legitimacy obtains from civil law. Whether a marriage is sacramental or not, if it is legal, the children of it are legitimate.

Do you think that folks married in front of a Justice of the Peace don't have legitimate children? Do you think the Catholic Church thinks that?


sitetest


52 posted on 10/26/2004 3:40:38 PM PDT by sitetest (Why does everyone get so uptight about toasted heretics??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
.
John Kerry married Theresa in May 1995 and was granted an annulment from the Catholic Church from his first marriage to Julia Thorne Kerry in 1998, well maybe . . . Who knows with Kerry. I think I remember reading that Julia was against the annulment, but Kerry pushed the issue at the beckoning of Theresa after their marriage.

Lots of facts and quotes about the president-wannabe at the John F. Kerry Timeline.
.

53 posted on 10/26/2004 3:47:56 PM PDT by christie (John F. Kerry Timeline - http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson