Drudge reports that 60 Minutes wanted to report this garbage on election eve! The BC 04 campaign should be very aggressive on this story tomorrow to help set the record straight.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: picturefan
Lamest. 'October Surprise'. Ever.
2 posted on
10/25/2004 11:34:16 PM PDT by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi!)
To: picturefan
Why is DAN RATHER not fired? I think he should go to prison for the fraudulent and disgusting things he has done since that forged document story.
There needs to be ACCOUNTABILITY in the media.
To: picturefan
4 posted on
10/25/2004 11:34:28 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: picturefan
They better wise up before Kerry wins this election!Where in the hell is the RNC October surprise!!!!!!!!!!!
To: picturefan
The BC 04 campaign should be very aggressive
I'm sure they'll try to "stay above it all" as they did with Rather. No reason for them to dirty their hands with this.
6 posted on
10/25/2004 11:35:31 PM PDT by
BJClinton
(We need a President who will stand up to the trial lawyers in Washington, not put one on the ticket.)
To: picturefan
Maybe 60minutes should stop with the shopped story stuff. It keeps blowing up in their faces.
To: picturefan
Executive producer Jeff Fager hoped to break the story during a high-impact election eve broadcast of 60 MINS on October 31That's a heavy, heavy charge. Hope Drudge has something to back that up. If he does, the Pajama People have got to ride on Viacom again, and this time, we will not be turned back!
9 posted on
10/25/2004 11:37:11 PM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(FR got Rather and CBS. Drudge got Halperin and ABC. Be afraid, Tom Brokaw -- be very afraid.)
To: picturefan
[The source behind the NYT story first went to CBSNEWS' 60 MINUTES last Wednesday, but the beleaguered network wasn't able to get the piece on the air as fast as the newspaper could print. Executive producer Jeff Fager hoped to break the story during a high-impact election eve broadcast of 60 MINS on October 31.] The veneer of respectable journalism has completely worn away from the MSM.
10 posted on
10/25/2004 11:37:43 PM PDT by
spodefly
(I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
To: picturefan
MY MAMA ALWAYS TOLD ME .... You better shop around.
11 posted on
10/25/2004 11:37:50 PM PDT by
dennisw
(Gd - against Amelek for all generations.)
To: picturefan
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
14 posted on
10/25/2004 11:38:14 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
To: picturefan
Okay Guys.
Let me ask you this: do you think this is the end from those desperate animals? Trust me, there is more to come and they are going to throw everything they can at us.
Stay alert.
If they do throw something our way as big as this was going to be, send mass e-mails out to the media letting them know the other side.
I thank God for the alternative media that is out there now. Thank you Rush! Thank you Sean! Thank you Drudge! Thank you Laura! Thank you Savage!
18 posted on
10/25/2004 11:41:14 PM PDT by
Erich4Dubya
(Tax money for abortions? Not on my dime!)
To: picturefan
Drudge reports that 60 Minutes wanted to report this garbage on election eve!we should all write letters to the FEC and FCC and have CBS and NY TIMES declared as partisan advertising for the Dems
22 posted on
10/25/2004 11:41:55 PM PDT by
GeronL
(FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
To: picturefan
To: picturefan
So they kind of shot their load. All bat, no game.
39 posted on
10/25/2004 11:49:30 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: picturefan
60 Minutes wants/ed this tripe on Halloween? LOL
To: picturefan
This is precious:
A senior Bush official e-mailed DRUDGE late Monday: "Let me get this straight, are Mr. Kerry and Mr. Edwards now saying we did not go into Iraq SOON ENOUGH? We should have invaded and liberated Iraq sooner?"
Kerry and his gang are 100% desperate. They are looking to try to LIE, CHEAT, SCARE, OBFUSCATE, and STEAL this election away via any means necessary. PATHETIC!!!
56 posted on
10/25/2004 11:57:44 PM PDT by
ezfindit
(OrthodoxNet.com - Shining the Light of Wisdom and Truth)
To: picturefan
To: picturefan
Since the NYT story is turning out to be a big fat nothing (via NBC's info), CBS should be breathing a sigh of relief that they dodged a bullet. "Breaking" two debunked anti-Bush stories in a row would have completely trashed the program.
65 posted on
10/26/2004 12:00:40 AM PDT by
Phocion
To: picturefan
For just a minute there, I was PROUD of NBC for covering this story. When it comes down to it, what do they have to gain by running with this? Nothing - but it certainly means they have stepped in to uphold the honor of our boys who arrived to find the goods gone. The same boys THEY were embedded with during this war...
Could it be that there is someone with journalistic ethics left in this world?
67 posted on
10/26/2004 12:01:05 AM PDT by
dandelion
(http://johnkerryquestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
To: picturefan
>>Drudge reports that 60 Minutes wanted to report this garbage on election eve!
cBS must be livid!
Slime-bombs backfire if used too soon before election day!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson