Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/22/2004 8:20:39 PM PDT by funeralcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: funeralcom

He of course would formulate a plan...


2 posted on 10/22/2004 8:22:02 PM PDT by DSBull (Leather Belts, with Liberal logic everywhere they are keeping my head from exploding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

You would have thought he would have a canned answer for a simple question like that. Im surprised he didnt say "Kerry has a plan"


3 posted on 10/22/2004 8:22:21 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Jeepers! Like this is a surpise!!

One thing that is obvious and evident about the RAT party...... These butt-munches are without a f**kin' CLUE!!!!


5 posted on 10/22/2004 8:23:50 PM PDT by Howie66 ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

He has a plan. Just go to johnkerry.com


6 posted on 10/22/2004 8:24:25 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Dial Jacques in the loo to ask first?


7 posted on 10/22/2004 8:24:44 PM PDT by Chummy (RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom
He will pull out and allow the extremists to take over Iraq and that will embolden them to retake Afghanistan and even Kuwait and other countries.

It will embolden terrorists around the world, and many countries will no longer trust the US to act when its necessary.

He will defer everything to the UN.

11 posted on 10/22/2004 8:26:16 PM PDT by GeronL (FREE KERRY'S SCARY bumper sticker .......... http://www.kerrysscary.com/bumper_sticker.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

I'm watching the replay right now. Pacificst punks. Dangerous to have in charge. I'll bet O'Reilly doesn't aks about Holbrooke's comment about this being a "metaphorical" war. ---- I was right.

We should bomb Al-Jazeera however. Good point O.


12 posted on 10/22/2004 8:26:30 PM PDT by HardHat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Holbrooke couldn't say that Aljazeera should be expelled from the USA and also couldn't say that they were terrorists....


16 posted on 10/22/2004 8:27:50 PM PDT by funeralcom ("What goes around, comes around".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

This is the potential Secretary of State if Kerry is elected. Man, are we gonna be in a heap of trouble.


18 posted on 10/22/2004 8:28:04 PM PDT by midftfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Did I really hear Bill O in the opening segment call Holbrook "future secretary of state"? I'm wondering if he did, did he even qualify it by saying IF Kerry wins.


19 posted on 10/22/2004 8:28:12 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch (LORD, PLEASE HAVE MERCY ON US, DON'T LET JOHN KERRY WIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

He couldn't say, "SURRENDER" January 23rd.


23 posted on 10/22/2004 8:30:06 PM PDT by 1stMarylandRegiment (Conserve Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom
What little i have seen of Holbrooke does not come across to me as the sharpest knife in the drawer.
24 posted on 10/22/2004 8:30:21 PM PDT by solo gringo (Don't be a girlie man vote Bush/Cheney in/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Humuna humuna humuna. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


25 posted on 10/22/2004 8:30:37 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom
O'Reilly seemed to bow down to Holbrooke.

Also Opined that he don't care who gets elected in Iraq, he just wants them to get out of there so no more Americans lose their life. We need to do what it takes to win, not tuck tail and run.

He also had to repeat that he was going to give equal time to be Fair & Balanced, but seemed to let Holbrooke speak uninterrupted. He even let him quote the New York Times and the Washington Post as reliable sources?

What gives with O' Reilly, is he starting to drift to the MSM, perhaps he's shooting for Dan Rather's Job.

Or maybe he's scared of the outcome of the lawsuit and wants support from all sides.

He definitely has swung towards the Liberal edge in the last several months. Its ashame, he just lost another viewer!
26 posted on 10/22/2004 8:30:46 PM PDT by GARealtor (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Holbrooke was responsible for the messes in Bosnia and Kosovo.

If O'Reilly had asked him what to do about Belgrade, he would have found the answer easily. Bomb it.


28 posted on 10/22/2004 8:31:18 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

This is why, after Teddy Kennedy's fiasco of 1980, one
of the many forbidden questions of Kerry is:
"Why do you want to be president?"

I saw that "60 Minutes" show when Teddy simply had no
answer for that question.


31 posted on 10/22/2004 8:32:39 PM PDT by Boundless (Was your voter registration sabotaged by ACORN? Don't find out Nov. 2. Vote early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

Do nothing bureaucrat blowhard can't give straight answer to straight question. Film at 11.


33 posted on 10/22/2004 8:33:32 PM PDT by TeddyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom
None of Kerry's mouthpieces, nor Edwards, nor Kerry himself can give answers of any substance. They don't know what Kerry would do. Kerry doesn't know what he would do.

The whole Kerry campaign has been built on 'GWB is bad', not on what Kerry would be. Yeh, Kerry 'would have done almost everything different.' But what does that mean? Kerry has never said.

Team Kerry expects the voters to buy a pig in a poke---and so far, nearly half of the voters seem willing to do so.
37 posted on 10/22/2004 8:35:38 PM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

I just noticed something; I just saw an old Jimmy Carter ad on TV Land. The ad said to vote for Carter for a change.

Bill Clinton also ran on "no theme" (aka 'a nebulus plan') and "change" as well.

Now, Kerry "has a plan" and is also running on "change."

Let's just hope that the American people fully understand that "change", while 'change', does not necessarily entail a positive move for the better!!!

Frankly, most of us have had enough "change." The only thing consistent about Carter, Clinton, and Kerry is that their plan will only leave you with change, in your pocket.


40 posted on 10/22/2004 8:38:25 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: funeralcom

"Reilly: "Shouldn't Al Jeezera be expelled from the US?"

Holbrooke: "I'll leave that to the Bush Administration"

O"Reilly: "Come on Ambassador I am asking you! You might be in office and you need to think about these things"


46 posted on 10/22/2004 8:41:41 PM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson